Do you consider the devs "bias"

In some respects yes, some respects no.

When survivors take a hit to their abilities, there's compensation. Look at this latest patch that did a slight debuff to gen stacking speed, but in exchange gen great checks are all worth 2x points now and killers get slower mori as the animation now won't start before the timer is confirmed.

When killers take a hit, it feels like there's no real consideration for how this impacts the game and any compensation for it. The nurse 'rework' was a nerf, plain and simple, it took the most effective red-rank killer and annihilated her mobility. Hex Ruin nerf crippled all low mobility killers end of, and the new system has not really compensated for that.

Now look at what survivors get to do. For years now, survivors can stack decisive strike, it's such an OP perk at inconveniencing the killer that it runs rampant. SWF especially love to all take DS because you can stack it during EGC to prevent anyone being sacrificed. Devs don't care that an anti-tunneling perk can be used actively by multiple or during end game collapse, both criteria invalidate the purpose of it being anti-tunneling, but so help me god if killers are using hex ruin a little too much.

Low mobility killers are borderline useless now, the only blatantly high mobility killer left is billy and his mobility is purely dependent on map layout.

We're at a point now where all killer metas get wiped out, so most killers just mori or play survivor until they can buy mori.

No. People who say they are most likely are just whining for their favorite role's sake.

Note: I say most likely. Of course there's people who will have legitimate points, but most people I see saying that are just saying it for the sake of saying it, and saying the devs favor the opposite "side."

No. I don't.

My experience playing survivor ( I main killer but probably split my time 70/30), the wait times are only getting longer and longer on PC, also the matchmaking criteria on PC appears to be growing wider and wider all the time, even rank 1s are finding rank 17s now because they spend so long in matchmaking that it widened the ranking criteria to be almost everybody before it finds a killer for them.

We're not talking about PS4 times though, we're saying about PC times (Which is Steam + Window Store)

My understanding is the game comes quickly because you get matched with people who's own criteria is wide enough to get you in the game. So if a 2-man SWF of rank 1 and rank 2 are queuing for 7 minutes, then when a rank 11 comes to play, he's already eligible for their game and you get put together. It is a lack of killers that causes the waits to happen and thus the matchmaking criteria to widen. But yes, I am only referring to PC, consoles have always been fairly different.

I think the devs have more perspective than us when it comes to balancing the game. However that does not mean they are unable to make mistakes. I agree with most of their balancing goals, but not necessarily with how far they push things or some of the design and redesign choices they make.

They are inherently toxic playstyles that are allowed to exist and can actively drive players away from the game. Yelling at the McDonald's crew because they got your order wrong isn't an illegal activity, but they'd sure appreciate it if you didn't scream at them.

Some people consider allowing these to be bias because it is only allowed (through game design, not the devs directly) on one side, rather than both and on the side that deletes players out from a match.

I never said that gen-rushing is fine. DS, BT, DH can all easily be worked around and I have shown how to in several posts. I never said that quick kills are a bad thing. Most people will have a "different" definition of these things, but all of them would all have a particular core that is the same. I don't want easy escapes as most other killers would put it. I want to be challenged, which camping and tunnelling deny outright.

What I'm saying that ruining my game on purpose is toxic. To me, camping and tunnelling is toxic because it ruins the game.

Devs are primarily incompetent above all else. 4 years on we're still seeing infinite loading screens sometimes, look at stupid implementations like how decisive strike can stack (Defeats the entire point of why it's there but hey-ho), hell you can still get UE4 crashes that the game didn't catch, and then there's the huge latency bugs like killers getting hits from 5+ meters away or ending up inside objects.

It's not really bias but more of oversight and ignorance. A good example was how the ruin nerf was a nerf for all the weaker killers in the game because they can't apply pressure as well as others. So it was mostly done to make survivor more enjoyable without the annoyance of ruin, but consequently made all the bad killers sink lower into the ground. Ironically this made the game less enjoyable for both sides because killers feel like they have less time to actually play the game and survivors are getting slugged way more often. It's not enough to just hook survivors now and killers will resort to scummier tactics. No, it isn't fun being hooked in the middle of a gen lock down or spending half the match on the floor, but on the other hand the killer doesn't want a 6 min game. It's also made the killer diversity plummet harder than it already was. Playing trapper is basically impossible unless you like fighting for 1 gen. It goes as well for other killers too, because their powers are either too underwhelming or too slow. The fast pace direction that dbd is heading for cannot match its killers. None of this was considered so by trying to be nice they burned themselves in the process. I love the game and will probably stick with it for a long time but breakable walls and other gimmicks will not help.