Solution to the massive hate and toxicity on the non-disclosure of the DLC/PTB release dates
my momma told me:
1.- Remove the word "soon" from any official thread, this only trolls and is hopeless for our nerves
2-. Up to 24hrs after closing the PTB, say the exact date, time and timezone the DLC/PTB is online
3.- Profit, so customers (we) are happy and no dozens of toxicity threads on DBD staff
Comments
-
- It was meant as a joke, since it's become a community meme, and that's how people should've taken it.
- They don't know for sure, which is why no date was stated. Even if they did say it and then failed to meet the deadline, they'd get a bigger shitstorm.
- Just because you're angry about something doesn't mean you deserve to be appeased. One such example is stuff that you did to yourself.
Post edited by Orion on12 -
@BACKSTABBER said:
2-. Up to 24hrs after closing the PTB, say the exact date, time and timezone the DLC/PTB is onlineWhat if they don't have one? Never thought of this?
5 -
Please, stop pretending they spread the rumor or forced people to accept it as factual. Everyone did it to themselves, and the reasonable people took the "Soon" statement as the joke it was.
6 -
They are just facing the consequences of what they've created.
Totally deserved.
By saying nothing, they also spread the rumor, and maked it even worse.
They PERFECTLY know their community.
As i said, i call out the mindset behind this.
Not the DLC's release.
5 -
Giche said:
I mean...
They know how toxic their community is.
They see this said community (that they CREATED, never forget that) acting as it usually do (toxicity fest)
But no, they'd rather don't say anything at first, to see how far it can go.
And when everything is already "burning" they also rather post their usual trollish answer, like "Go play something else" back then.
Spilling gas on the fire.
Knowing this game's history, they still act all smug with everyone of us, even the most reasonable one.
Like some sort of disgusting scientist : "Let see what happen if say this LUL".
They already make money on toxicity (that they created, again) and even dare to act smug and mock their customers, after all of this.
F.U.C.K them, nothing else to add.
I don't even care nor was hyped about the next Chapter.
I just can't stand toxic peoples, and these devs especially.
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.
Edit: @giche (since the notification system doesn't work sometimes)5 -
@BACKSTABBER said:
my momma told me:1.- Remove the word "soon" from any official thread, this only trolls and is hopeless for our nerves
2-. Up to 24hrs after closing the PTB, say the exact date, time and timezone the DLC/PTB is online
3.- Profit, so customers (we) are happy and no dozens of toxicity threads on DBD staff
Honestly they just need to let everyone know 48 hours or so in advance of an updates release date. Far fewer people would have been annoyed yesterday or in the future if they actually announced release dates instead of just ninja dropping it all the time. People can't be disappointed if they know when something is going to come out.
0 -
@Vietfox said:
Giche said:I mean...
They know how toxic their community is.
They see this said community (that they CREATED, never forget that) acting as it usually do (toxicity fest)
But no, they'd rather don't say anything at first, to see how far it can go.
And when everything is already "burning" they also rather post their usual trollish answer, like "Go play something else" back then.
Spilling gas on the fire.
Knowing this game's history, they still act all smug with everyone of us, even the most reasonable one.
Like some sort of disgusting scientist : "Let see what happen if say this LUL".
They already make money on toxicity (that they created, again) and even dare to act smug and mock their customers, after all of this.
F.U.C.K them, nothing else to add.
I don't even care nor was hyped about the next Chapter.
I just can't stand toxic peoples, and these devs especially.
You don't know their reasons to not tell the release date, could need some more testing for instance. We don't want another patch with new bugs like tinkerer2. Stop assuming you are being trolled.
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.
Edit: @giche (since the notification system doesn't work sometimes)They don't even have to say the actual release date. But they need to say SOMETHING. They could easily say something like "the patch isn't quite ready yet. We ran into some unexpected bugs and are working on fixing them. We will let you know as soon as it's ready."
2 -
@Orion said:
1. It was meant as a joke, since it's become a community meme, and that's how people should've taken it.
2. They don't know for sure, which is why no date was stated. Even if they did say it and then failed to meet the deadline, they'd get a bigger shitstorm.
3. Just because you're angry about something doesn't mean you deserve to be appeased. One such example is stuff that you did to yourself.They would not get a bigger shitstorm for delaying an update if they announced a release date as long as they communicated the reasoning behind the delay. Most people are understanding and know that updates/patches can sometimes get delayed. Saying nothing is always worse than saying something in situations like this
2 -
@Vietfox said:
You don't know their reasons to not tell the release date, could need some more testing for instance. We don't want another patch with new bugs like tinkerer2. Stop assuming you are being trolled.Just saying "Not today, it was a rumor" whould have solved this.
The only backlash they would have got would have been from the impatients people.
But no, they'd rather answer by a trollish meme.
@Vietfox said:
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.
Totally shameless huh ?
6 -
Everyone knew it was a rumor. Stop pretending otherwise.
4 -
@Vietfox said:
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.
Totally shameless huh ?
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
@giche
3 -
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.
Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.
Totally shameless huh ?
So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
@gicheYou are toxic.
Thank me later.
13 -
@RSB said:
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity.
Coming from you, that made me laught so hard.
Totally shameless huh ?
So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
@gicheYou are toxic.
Thank me later.
2 -
@Vietfox said:
@Vietfox said:
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
You are toxic.
Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD
Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
11 -
RSB said:
@Vietfox said:
@Vietfox said:
If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie.
You are toxic.
Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD
Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
2 -
@Vietfox said:
RSB said:@Vietfox said:
@RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @Vietfox said: If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie. @giche You are toxic. Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD
Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
One was mine
And the other 12? XDD 5 minutes ago I had 600, now I have 613.
2 -
RSB said:
@Vietfox said:
RSB said:@Vietfox said:
@RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @Vietfox said: If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie. @giche You are toxic. Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD
Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
One was mine
And the other 12? XDD
Told you, idk.1 -
@Vietfox said:
RSB said:@Vietfox said:
RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @Vietfox said: If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie. @giche You are toxic. Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
One was mine
And the other 12? XDD
Vietfox stables xDDD
Told you, idk.
Everytime you @me I got a lol spam, this is damn bizzare ;-;
### it, i'm going for 1k lols, gonna be the first on forum. POUR SOME SUGAR ON ME, IN THE NAME OF LOVE
12 -
RSB said:
@Vietfox said:
RSB said:@Vietfox said:
RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @Vietfox said: If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie. @giche You are toxic. Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
One was mine
And the other 12? XDD
Vietfox stables xDDD
Told you, idk.
Everytime you @me I got a lol spam, this is damn bizzare ;-;
2 -
@Vietfox said:
RSB said:@Vietfox said:
RSB said:
@Vietfox said: RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @Vietfox said: If you get the "go play somewhere else" answer is probably because it's the answer you deserved, just look at the way you talk.
PS: you always complain about toxicity but you fail to realize that you are the one who brings the toxicity. Coming from you, that made me laught so hard. Totally shameless huh ? So far you've been the only one who has called me toxic (maybe @RSB too, idk)
You need to understand this: disagreeing with you =/= being toxic. You basically call toxic to almost every survivor, killers who side survivors in some discussions and yet you claim to be the one who fights toxicity. Hilarious, could be used for a comedy movie. @giche You are toxic. Thank me later.
Lol, and thought we were getting along xDD Lols? OH, COME ON, NOT AGAIN
One was mine And the other 12? XDD Vietfox stables xDDD
Told you, idk.
Everytime you @me I got a lol spam, this is damn bizzare ;-;
I'll give you an awesome just for that xDD
I'll give a lol for an exchange.
3 -
@powerbats said:
1 -
@powerbats said:
@RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.
I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.
3 -
@RSB said:
@powerbats said:
@RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.
I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.
I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.1 -
@powerbats said:
@RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.
You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.
I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.
@powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?
1 -
@RSB said:
@powerbats said:
@RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing.
You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself.
I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess.
@powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?
0 -
@Vietfox said:
@RSB said:
@powerbats said: @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing. You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself. I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess. @powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.
Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?
What @powerbats said: "You used to a ways back see who gave you what"
Oh, I did not know that, understood it wrongly, I think. Quite sad we can't see it now.
4 -
Giche said:
@Vietfox said:
You don't know their reasons to not tell the release date, could need some more testing for instance. We don't want another patch with new bugs like tinkerer2. Stop assuming you are being trolled.The only backlash they would have got would have been from the impatients people.
2 -
What people should do if they don't like the "Soon" being posted....
Write to the Dead By Daylight email and offer your criticism and / or complaint about the issue you have in regards to it. Don't do it on the public discussion forums hoping to gather sympathy or support for such a dumb complaint.
Don't expect hard date and time for release, since they haven't been doing that for quite awhile now.
Don't take player base speculation / theories on when the release date is as official responses from the developer.
If they put out an official release date and they happened to miss that date, because ######### happens sometimes. People like yourself would be one of the first ones on the forums posting how they can't keep release dates and demand to get something "free" in return for their mistake. There would be more people complaining about them missing a release date then there are about not putting out a date.
Figure it out.
3 -
RSB said:
@Vietfox said:
@RSB said:
@powerbats said: @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing. You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself. I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess. @powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works.
Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?
What @powerbats said: "You used to a ways back see who gave you what"
Oh, I did not know that, understood it wrongly, I think. Quite sad we can't see it now.
2 -
@Vietfox said:
RSB said:@Vietfox said:
@RSB said:
@Vietfox said: @RSB said:
@powerbats said: @RSB @Vietfox I've been giving you both some lol's as well as awesomes since your back and forth is amusing. You used to a ways back see who gave you what but that's not functional anymore unless of course that was a bug. I thought it was kinda neat myself. I think receiving 320+ awesomes in one day was not a bug, especially no one else had this issue on the forum. But thanks, I guess. @powerbats means that being able to see the names could be a bug, not receiving 320 lols.
I personally think that wasn't a bug, they just changed the way it works. Wait, monkey in my brin stopped working, what "ability to see names"?
What @powerbats said: "You used to a ways back see who gave you what"
Oh, I did not know that, understood it wrongly, I think. Quite sad we can't see it now.
Yeah you also misread most of my posts as well
Actually, not ;>
2 -
-
@George_Soros said:
And when everything is already "burning" they also rather post their usual trollish answer, like "Go play something else" back then.
Sweet Jesus, can someone confirm this? Have the devs really told someone "Go play something else"?
If they have, they are goddamn HEROES." Go play survivor, or I dunno, other game, like Civilisation".
5 -
@George_Soros said:
Sweet Jesus, can someone confirm this? Have the devs really told someone "Go play something else"?
If they have, they are goddamn HEROES.Back then in January 2018 during one of their livestream, Mathieu Cote, the Game Director was asked :
"Killer is tedious and stressfull, due to the imbalance, anything planned to fix this ?"
M. Cote: "LUL that's... an opinion. Maybe you are tired of playing killer, try Survivor or even better, go play something else if you don't enjoy it. I heard Civ 5 is a really good one."
Toxic survivor mains down here will tell you :
"Everything is fine, killah only want EZ 4K, nothing toxic here, grow a pair "
6 -
Wow. That's an amazing attitude. I love this Mathieu guy, even though he's French.
3 -
He is Canadian, I think.
5 -
@George_Soros said:
Wow. That's an amazing attitude. I love this Mathieu guy, even though he's French.You'll need a better bait.
Just saying that you love anything that peoples despise isn't a good one.
Racism either.@RSB said:
He is Canadian, I think.From Quebec i think.
5 -
I mean they don't help themselves at times. The decent thing to do would have been to just shut down the expectations that the new Chapter was gonna be out yesterday.
1 -
George_Soros said:
Wow. That's an amazing attitude. I love this Mathieu guy, even though he's French.
0 -
Have you read what i wrote at least ?
@Giche said:
They know how toxic their community is.They see this said community (that they CREATED, never forget that) acting as it usually do (toxicity fest)
But no, they'd rather don't say anything at first, to see how far it can go.
And when everything is already "burning" they also rather post their usual trollish answer, like "Go play something else" back then.
Spilling gas on the fire.
@Giche said:
As i said, i call out the mindset behind this.
Not the DLC's release.
Not gonna repeat, quoting this is enough.
5 -
I can understand the expectations, I personally can't wait to play with the new killer (and the new Wraith!), but all this fuss is pointless. If it comes a week or two later, fine - hopefully they weed out a few more bugs.
Frankly, although I generally like the DBD community, it shows how accustomed we are to companies bending backwards to please customers in our age. As soon as (some) players realized they can voice their opinion, and the developer team actually cares about the product and they continuosly tweak and balance and rebalance, a flood of demands engulfed the forums "nerf this" "buff that" "ban this kind of behaviour" "implement these changes I'm proposing at once"...
Are we all spoilt brats?Also, the answer "Soon" is just hilarious.
4 -
@BACKSTABBER said:
my momma told me:1.- Remove the word "soon" from any official thread, this only trolls and is hopeless for our nerves
2-. Up to 24hrs after closing the PTB, say the exact date, time and timezone the DLC/PTB is online
3.- Profit, so customers (we) are happy and no dozens of toxicity threads on DBD staff
It is suppose to be the fall chapter. It isn't even fall. The community ######### on the killer, they just closed the ptb and need to process the data and feedback. Maybe have a little patience. They did not announce any date and told everyone thursday they had no date. Why is this so hard to understand.
The previous late release 2.0 didn't remove the shard cap and that was what most console users complained about this is simply a new chapter. Chill out for a bit, play something else or keep grinding bloodpoints. The unreasonable complaints on this forum are out of hand.
5 -
Orion said:
- It was meant as a joke, since it's become a community meme, and that's how people should've taken it.
3 -
@George_Soros said:
Giche said:
And when everything is already "burning" they also rather post their usual trollish answer, like "Go play something else" back then.
Sweet Jesus, can someone confirm this? Have the devs really told someone "Go play something else"?
If they have, they are goddamn HEROES.
EDIT: 31:26
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj6YMIw1oig&t=1886s1 -
@BACKSTABBER said:
my momma told me:1.- Remove the word "soon" from any official thread, this only trolls and is hopeless for our nerves
2-. Up to 24hrs after closing the PTB, say the exact date, time and timezone the DLC/PTB is online
I agree with removing the word "Soon" for the same reason as you. But the "EXACT" date would be near impossible due to set backs that can occur, which would very obviously end up in a delay. The devs don't know 100% when they can implement the updates, It's the same thing that happened with the Clown and the shop, they had no idea when it would get approved. The problem that they really need to fix is their lack of communication with the community, and based on a comment I saw from not-Queen it seems they are trying to fix that.
0 -
"HATE AND TOXICITY ON THE NON-DISCLOSURE OF THE DLC/PTB RELEASE DATES"???
What hate lol? You high?PS
They don't owe you nothing so be a mature person ( I guess you're not tho ) and wait.0 -
A release date is always good but fill your life with other things and you won't care as much if things get delayed or if you don't know the exact date of the release.
0 -
@BigBadPiggy said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
my momma told me:1.- Remove the word "soon" from any official thread, this only trolls and is hopeless for our nerves
2-. Up to 24hrs after closing the PTB, say the exact date, time and timezone the DLC/PTB is online
I agree with removing the word "Soon" for the same reason as you. But the "EXACT" date would be near impossible due to set backs that can occur, which would very obviously end up in a delay. The devs don't know 100% when they can implement the updates, It's the same thing that happened with the Clown and the shop, they had no idea when it would get approved. The problem that they really need to fix is their lack of communication with the community, and based on a comment I saw from not-Queen it seems they are trying to fix that.
The problem here is that they are purposely delaying the pc launch just to try and not make console players mad. Pc players shouldn't be punished because of consoles problems. They could very easily give concrete release dates (occasional delay due to bugs) if they didn't worry about console players being upset.
0 -
What they should do is just release the pc version whenever it is ready. Give us a time frame of when they think that will happen. Then, do the best they can to get the console version out as soon as possible. It would be cool if consoles could get the update at time same time as pc, but it's incredibly stupid to force pc to wait an extra week or two for no reason other than the fact that they want to wait for console approval.
0 -
@Elegant said:
The problem here is that they are purposely delaying the pc launch just to try and not make console players mad. Pc players shouldn't be punished because of consoles problems.Turns out the chapter just became available on Steam.
0