EZ win?
Pls explain something to me, if possible at all:
Survivors are meant to survive. Killers are meant to kill.
Now... you go as killer. You hook 3 people, and let the 4th one bleed out on the floor. Maybe you didn't want to, maybe you didn't find them while you were off killing someone else. Doesn't matter.
Survivors go in chat, saying how noob you are - as they always do - BUT... they keep laughing and mocking at you that this was an "ez win" to them, BECAUSE you didn't manage to hook the 4th person (doesn't matter why).
Question is: how is this a "win" ?
Thanks in advance
Best Answer
-
It's not.
You faced off against kids taking a break from telling people they banged their mom on XBOX Call of Duty to try and grief someone in a different game. It's just the toxic mentality of some players.
Game was actually toxic-free when the last tome was released (for me at least), everyone was super nice and complimenting eachothers' playstyles regardless of who died or lived or how bad someone was - it was all "nice try" "better luck on your next match" "well played" "cool build" "that sucked but gg".
Last 2 weeks have been a surge of racial slurs, EZ, kid taunts, teabagging, and general douchebaggery returning.
5
Answers
-
It's an active denial of points for the killer, as well as emblems. Emblems are earned through hooking, and bleeding out gives far fewer points to the killer than hooking and sacrificing them would. It's effectively one last moment of spite in the face of losing the game.
1 -
a "moral" win for them
like when im the last person and the killer close the hatch, if the entity kill me before he hook me is a moral win for me.
0
