We as a Community NEED to Stop with the "What about..." arguments.
I can not talk about a certain problem in this forum without being hit with "What about X thing from killer side" or "What about X thing from survivor side". We will never get anything accomplish if everyone thinks like this. Scott Jund made a perfect video explaining this problem. Looks like not enough people have watched. Here is a link.
Comments
-
Oh sure, you think we need to stop with the "What about" arguments here but what about all the "What About" arguments on Twitter?!?!
Post edited by tippy2k2 on3 -
How many threads you going to make today? You are literally circle jerking yourself with these last two threads.
3 -
You have to have this, because of the balance. The game is already unbalanced in favor of survivor, if you nerf what bad survivors see as overpowered, you completely destroy the game.
2 -
How many of my threads are you going to respond to even though you said you don't want to discuss things with me? I just want to have different discussions about different topics. What is wrong with that?
0 -
If things are directly related to each other I don't see the problem with bringing them up in the discussion, but if someone says, Moris are too strong and someone brings up something like The Hatch being too powerful, while both may or may not have points they are barely related and as such should have seperate discussions about them.
0 -
I'm down to discuss micro pp as it affects me irl
0
