Would you like FNAF in the game ?

Nearly perfectly balanced, as all things should be...

I'd love to see it happen, though this kind of poll is a bit overplayed at this point.

I think there should be an awnser in between 'no' and 'I wouldn't mind'. Although I'd be disappointed with it, especially that I'm not a fan of the game, I wouldn't go to the extent that many others have in the past to quit.

Regardless, Scott did say he had no plans for crossovers this year, although he is known for his trickery so maybe we will have one. Additionally, I really can't see the devs adding a killer so controversial.

That is true. Almost every game in the franchise was composed of having very little in terms of new gameplay, and more often than not, they had a strategy that worked 100% of the time even if RNG was involved. The exceptions to those to would be FNaF1, and Pizzaria simulator (Edit, and Sister Location, but that's a whole different story). Those had stategies that would require you to change your play style over the course of the game. There wasn't one working strategy. I think the killer would be interesting, anyways, and I understand why people don't or wouldn't want it.

I'm not entering the love/hate part of the community towards FNAF.

I never played the games only really enjoy watching playthrough and got many scares from it.

I think it would be a cool addition to the game if it manages to bring that level of not feeling safe at any moment and get a jumpscare at the other. I honestly don't know what the power could be but just hope that next DLC will be fun to play and to play against, with good perks that will shake the meta a bit and characters with cool voices and nice cosmetics !

No, I think FNAF is goofy as hell and not scary in the slightest. I also really cant imagine how they could make Springtrap both faithful to his character mechanics, and not be pathetically weak in the context of DBD, and if you dont stay accurate to the character, why even bother including them in the first place?

Absolutely not, I don't think a FNAF killer would fit in with the other killers.

In a very respectful way, I don't think this would work and it doesn't fit in with DBD.

I wouldn't mind having a FNAF chapter, really. It is a franchise that is known by a lot of people, could bring in new players and we don't have a killer that is similar to the FNAF killer, so it could be a good idea.

Another thing to mention about FNAF is that the character designs would need to be heavily altered to fit into DBD. FNAF has a really unrealistic artstyle, almost cartoonish but not quite, while every other lisenced character comes from either live-action or games with fairly realistic art directions.

James would have made sense, yeah, but BHVR was going for a sort of "best of" thing for the Silent Hill chapter.

A map from SH1, a Killer from SH2, and Survivor from SH3. I think that's fine.

Definitely yes. Springtrap would 100% work in DBD, the other animatronics are goofy looking but Springtrap isn't at all. And even though the FNAF games rely on jumpscares, that does not mean that Springtrap is only capable of doing jumpscares and nothing else. Anyone who is acquainted with FNAF's lore and what William Afton has done throughout the series knows that Springtrap is capable of so much more.

(Also, facing ninja Myers is, to me, one of the most fun things in DBD, and it's 100% jumpscares. So even if jumpscares are a bit dumb, it's not like they completely ruin the game or are incompatible with it. I've mentioned ninja Myers because he's the most jumpscare-inducing killer imo, but Ghostface, Pig, and silent bell Wraith can also fit here, as well as any killer running any perks that make them undetectable or that make you oblivious.)

im kinda getting sick of licensed killers. i feel like we have enough already, and if we do more, it will completely ruin the point of the game. it is supposed to be original and fun. also, the entire thing of FNAF is that they move when you arent looking, and im not sure how that would work.