Should DBD be more open to modding.
Somebody made a deathmatch in DBD and someone made 2v8 if they aren't planning to make any more gamemodes why not let the community make them.
Comments
-
For custom games maybe, for public games no.
20 -
Unless a game is created with modding in mind, I don't think it should be added after the fact, because then the devs have two options when it comes to updates:
- Tell modders what they're going to update (which the modders totally won't leak or anything) so the modders can prepare their mods ahead of time. It's impossible to reach every modder, so if the devs go this route they'll be accused of "playing favorites" and whatnot.
- Don't tell anyone what they're going to update before the fact. Mods will stop being compatible with newer versions of the game, as is normal for mods (but apparently people who use mods and even some modders themselves are oblivious to this very obvious fact of modding), and the devs will get hate for it. Furthermore, the way in which mods stop being compatible can actually corrupt files, depending on the mod in question.
7 -
I would like mod to be in the game but it will have to be in a separate game more that isn't affect by the patch (unless it to update the specific game mode then they should make a post to tell the modders about the update without telling when it coming live and would have a system in to tell the modders and the people who uses the mods that the mods haven't been updated needed to be uptated.
0 -
No. Imagine logging in to play and someone modded the game so Survivors glow through walls all the time.
Or modded Nurse to oneshot Survivors.
Or made the Killer invisible.
Or made Survivors invisible.
2 -
Thats just straight up cheating at that point, the point of this is if some one makes a mod every one is aware of said mod being in play
1 -
But hackers already do that lol
1 -
Yes, and allowing modding would make it easier to cheat in the game as a whole.
0
