Lagswitching and Lag in general from Killers is out of control.

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:
Uh no he deserves nothing so the 625 is all he gets. Has NOTHING to do with rationalizing and everything to do with justice. Go make me a sandwich since you're doing nothing with your worthless comment.

"Justice" is not "Everyone needs to accept my reasons for doing something I know is wrong". Don't blame the guy cheating at Monopoly for you setting the board on fire.

lol so lagswitching is ok? Yeah keep thinking that. Stop posting because you're clearly and provably wrong.

And your analogy is 100% fallacious. It'd be "Don't blame the guy cheating at Monopoly from you abandoning the match when you see he's cheating" Me setting the board on fire would be me going to the dev studio and blowing it up or going to the killer's house and pulling all of their internet wires from the neighborhood.

I didn't say lagswitching was OK, so why are you pretending I did?

You're right, the analogy could use some work. How about this: Don't blame the guy taking money from the bank for you taking money from him.
Both of you are breaking the rules, and both of you are responsible for your own actions. It's your fault you're disconnecting on purpose, and nobody else's. It's your choice to do it, no matter how much you want to put the blame on the other guy, just as it was his choice to lagswitch.

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:
Uh no he deserves nothing so the 625 is all he gets. Has NOTHING to do with rationalizing and everything to do with justice. Go make me a sandwich since you're doing nothing with your worthless comment.

"Justice" is not "Everyone needs to accept my reasons for doing something I know is wrong". Don't blame the guy cheating at Monopoly for you setting the board on fire.

lol so lagswitching is ok? Yeah keep thinking that. Stop posting because you're clearly and provably wrong.

And your analogy is 100% fallacious. It'd be "Don't blame the guy cheating at Monopoly from you abandoning the match when you see he's cheating" Me setting the board on fire would be me going to the dev studio and blowing it up or going to the killer's house and pulling all of their internet wires from the neighborhood.

I didn't say lagswitching was OK, so why are you pretending I did?

You're right, the analogy could use some work. How about this: Don't blame the guy taking money from the bank for you taking money from him.
Both of you are breaking the rules, and both of you are responsible for your own actions. It's your fault you're disconnecting on purpose, and nobody else's. It's your choice to do it, no matter how much you want to put the blame on the other guy, just as it was his choice to lagswitch.

DC'ing from a lagswitcher SHOULDN'T be against the rules.

Your analogy is still awful. Once again it would be "Blame the guy taking money from the bank by taking your money out before he can"

Shouldn't be, but it is, so you knowingly broke the rules.
My analogy is fine. Yours just makes you look like the good guy when you knowingly broke the rules just as much as the lagswitcher did. It's no surprise, given the bias you demonstrated.

Where does it say DC'ing from a lagswitcher is? Sorry, they already broke the rules, you're free to go. Try again. Your analogy is terrible because I'm not stealing from anyone. If anything it would be I'm stopping him from robbing the bank. Just stop. You're trash and wrong.

DCing is against the rules, no exceptions. There's a certain tolerance for important things like real-life issues, but you did break the rules.

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

My account was assault by having someone cheat against me. I'm allowed to do what I need to do to prevent it. Your analogies are the ones that are baseless and mean nothing. But hey keep trying to act like you're right when you're completely wrong and just an illogical person in general. I can't wait for someone to hit you in real life and see what you do since assaulting someone is illegal and according to you, you cannot assault them back.

When you're assaulted, what you do in response becomes self-defense. However, there are still limits to self-defense. But thanks for wishing harm upon me just because I pointed out that you're just as wrong as the lagswitcher.
When someone is cheating, DCing is still DCing.

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

My account was assault by having someone cheat against me. I'm allowed to do what I need to do to prevent it. Your analogies are the ones that are baseless and mean nothing. But hey keep trying to act like you're right when you're completely wrong and just an illogical person in general. I can't wait for someone to hit you in real life and see what you do since assaulting someone is illegal and according to you, you cannot assault them back.

When you're assaulted, what you do in response becomes self-defense. However, there are still limits to self-defense. But thanks for wishing harm upon me just because I pointed out that you're just as wrong as the lagswitcher.
When someone is cheating, DCing is still DCing.

Except it isn't. It's getting away from the cheater without rewarding them. Go take a nap yourself. You're ranting the same wrong bullshit over and over. Disconnecting from a lagswitcher is self defense.

Except it is. It's rewarding the lagswitcher with your ragequitting instead of reporting them.

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

My account was assault by having someone cheat against me. I'm allowed to do what I need to do to prevent it. Your analogies are the ones that are baseless and mean nothing. But hey keep trying to act like you're right when you're completely wrong and just an illogical person in general. I can't wait for someone to hit you in real life and see what you do since assaulting someone is illegal and according to you, you cannot assault them back.

When you're assaulted, what you do in response becomes self-defense. However, there are still limits to self-defense. But thanks for wishing harm upon me just because I pointed out that you're just as wrong as the lagswitcher.
When someone is cheating, DCing is still DCing.

Except it isn't. It's getting away from the cheater without rewarding them. Go take a nap yourself. You're ranting the same wrong bullshit over and over. Disconnecting from a lagswitcher is self defense.

Except it is. It's rewarding the lagswitcher with your ragequitting instead of reporting them.

You can report after, but lie more. Now you're changing goal posts. Weird that it's perfectly legal to [BAD WORD] on the hook rather than dc. But hey you're going to make more and more claims that are wrong. Get out of this thread already and go exercise rather than sitting and producing fallacious accounts and lies. You're also missing the point earlier that reports do nothing on console and that their intent is to go for DC before anything as they've laid out.

I said from the start that you should just wait until you die (go AFK, don't give them any satisfaction) and report them afterward.
No, I didn't know you could report them afterward. Unlike you, I don't have enough experience with DCing to know it.
Why are you being so hostile?

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

My account was assault by having someone cheat against me. I'm allowed to do what I need to do to prevent it. Your analogies are the ones that are baseless and mean nothing. But hey keep trying to act like you're right when you're completely wrong and just an illogical person in general. I can't wait for someone to hit you in real life and see what you do since assaulting someone is illegal and according to you, you cannot assault them back.

When you're assaulted, what you do in response becomes self-defense. However, there are still limits to self-defense. But thanks for wishing harm upon me just because I pointed out that you're just as wrong as the lagswitcher.
When someone is cheating, DCing is still DCing.

Except it isn't. It's getting away from the cheater without rewarding them. Go take a nap yourself. You're ranting the same wrong bullshit over and over. Disconnecting from a lagswitcher is self defense.

Except it is. It's rewarding the lagswitcher with your ragequitting instead of reporting them.

You can report after, but lie more. Now you're changing goal posts. Weird that it's perfectly legal to [BAD WORD] on the hook rather than dc. But hey you're going to make more and more claims that are wrong. Get out of this thread already and go exercise rather than sitting and producing fallacious accounts and lies. You're also missing the point earlier that reports do nothing on console and that their intent is to go for DC before anything as they've laid out.

I said from the start that you should just wait until you die (go AFK, don't give them any satisfaction) and report them afterward.
No, I didn't know you could report them afterward. Unlike you, I don't have enough experience with DCing to know it.
Why are you being so hostile?

Awwww calling you out on your ######### is being hostile? What are you Huffington Post?

Going afk gives them 100% satisfaction because they get their 4 kill they didn't deserve. Also I had two games this week where people were point farming with the killer and mad I finished the gens so they'd stand there with the killer and down me and heal me. Explain WHAT I could do there other than DC? You expect me to wait an hour for them all to get their points? Bullshit.

I'm just wondering why you're actively going out of your way to insult me in every comment even though all I've been doing is pointing out that DCing is just as against the rules as lagswitching. I don't really care that you do it, I'm just curious.

@Arsoul said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

My account was assault by having someone cheat against me. I'm allowed to do what I need to do to prevent it. Your analogies are the ones that are baseless and mean nothing. But hey keep trying to act like you're right when you're completely wrong and just an illogical person in general. I can't wait for someone to hit you in real life and see what you do since assaulting someone is illegal and according to you, you cannot assault them back.

When you're assaulted, what you do in response becomes self-defense. However, there are still limits to self-defense. But thanks for wishing harm upon me just because I pointed out that you're just as wrong as the lagswitcher.
When someone is cheating, DCing is still DCing.

Except it isn't. It's getting away from the cheater without rewarding them. Go take a nap yourself. You're ranting the same wrong bullshit over and over. Disconnecting from a lagswitcher is self defense.

Except it is. It's rewarding the lagswitcher with your ragequitting instead of reporting them.

You can report after, but lie more. Now you're changing goal posts. Weird that it's perfectly legal to [BAD WORD] on the hook rather than dc. But hey you're going to make more and more claims that are wrong. Get out of this thread already and go exercise rather than sitting and producing fallacious accounts and lies. You're also missing the point earlier that reports do nothing on console and that their intent is to go for DC before anything as they've laid out.

I said from the start that you should just wait until you die (go AFK, don't give them any satisfaction) and report them afterward.
No, I didn't know you could report them afterward. Unlike you, I don't have enough experience with DCing to know it.
Why are you being so hostile?

He's wrong and he knows it

That's my hypothesis as well.

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Orion said:

@purebalance said:

@Arsoul said:
Stop being to petty, you know exactly what they are saying.
Like it or not, you DCing on a lagswitching is still breaking the rules (right or wrong) it is what it is

No they already broke the rules with a more serious infraction. Try again. So you're just supposed to sit there and take it if someone assaults you because you think they'll claim assaulting them back is a crime? Yeah no it's self defense. Try again.

You were not assaulted, and this isn't real life. Your analogies and reaction speak volumes about your current state of mind, so I recommend you take a chill pill and sleep it off.

My account was assault by having someone cheat against me. I'm allowed to do what I need to do to prevent it. Your analogies are the ones that are baseless and mean nothing. But hey keep trying to act like you're right when you're completely wrong and just an illogical person in general. I can't wait for someone to hit you in real life and see what you do since assaulting someone is illegal and according to you, you cannot assault them back.

When you're assaulted, what you do in response becomes self-defense. However, there are still limits to self-defense. But thanks for wishing harm upon me just because I pointed out that you're just as wrong as the lagswitcher.
When someone is cheating, DCing is still DCing.

Except it isn't. It's getting away from the cheater without rewarding them. Go take a nap yourself. You're ranting the same wrong bullshit over and over. Disconnecting from a lagswitcher is self defense.

Except it is. It's rewarding the lagswitcher with your ragequitting instead of reporting them.

You can report after, but lie more. Now you're changing goal posts. Weird that it's perfectly legal to [BAD WORD] on the hook rather than dc. But hey you're going to make more and more claims that are wrong. Get out of this thread already and go exercise rather than sitting and producing fallacious accounts and lies. You're also missing the point earlier that reports do nothing on console and that their intent is to go for DC before anything as they've laid out.

I said from the start that you should just wait until you die (go AFK, don't give them any satisfaction) and report them afterward.
No, I didn't know you could report them afterward. Unlike you, I don't have enough experience with DCing to know it.
Why are you being so hostile?

He's wrong and he knows it

Except I'm 100% right and you both know it and you're just arguing because you lagswitch and want free kills. That's what I'm getting from this. "Just endure getting lagswitched so I can get my points and on console I don't get banned and they're going after DC first so yay" Yupp I'm totally the wrong one. Lagswitch more.

I don't lagswitch. Even if I was prone to cheating, I can't be bothered. I also don't own the game on console. Hell, I don't even own the console itself.
Yes, you are the wrong one. You're literally throwing out false accusations because you can't just admit how wrong you are.

@The_Crusader said:
Its funny when you loop the guy for ages and its all smooth and then all of a sudden the connection goes to crap and he hits you when you're teleporting all over.

Very suspicious.

They justify it to themselves, just like OP did.

@The_Crusader said:
What do you mean?

I remember one guy (banned now, I think/hope) who said he lagswitched when Survivors looped for too long or were in SWF. He said something along the lines of "If they don't play fair, why should I?"
People will always find ways to rationalize doing things they know are wrong. They don't just want to do it; they want to feel good about doing it. OP, lagswitchers, they're all the same in the end - justifying behavior they know is wrong.

lmao. this whole thread just proves that the community is pathetic. I've had lagswitchers on xbone as well.  I don't dc, but thats usually cause I still want whatever points I've been able to get. 

meanwhile, people are actually defending lagswitching. lmao. 
can't wait for the " It'S a LeGiT sTrAtEgY" comment. 

even if you're not defending lagswitching specifically, just seems like you're arguing to argue. 

DC if you want, but understand there will be consequences for it. its stupid in this situation, but having bhvr trying to determine when a dc is warranted or when it wasn't is going to be difficult and there's many other things they should be focusing on.

(like banning lagswitchers to begin with)

@Avariku said:
lmao. this whole thread just proves that the community is pathetic. I've had lagswitchers on xbone as well.  I don't dc, but thats usually cause I still want whatever points I've been able to get. 

meanwhile, people are actually defending lagswitching. lmao. 
can't wait for the " It'S a LeGiT sTrAtEgY" comment. 

even if you're not defending lagswitching specifically, just seems like you're arguing to argue. 

DC if you want, but understand there will be consequences for it. its stupid in this situation, but having bhvr trying to determine when a dc is warranted or when it wasn't is going to be difficult and there's many other things they should be focusing on.

(like banning lagswitchers to begin with)

Who was defending lagswitching in this thread? Please point them out to me, along with the comment where they're defending lagswitching.