So BHVR did an oopsie with these teasers
Comments
-
I just remember with Pyramid Head because of the geographical name of the file that it HAD to be Candyman. This was more clarification on my part than trying to say what it is or isn't. Honestly as long as it isn't Pennywise I'm happy.
0 -
The file names of the icons of DBD characters released after Huntress (DLC5) and before Twins (Aurora) are named after places- Twins, Trickster, and Resident Evil are named after... I think the best way I can put this is "things that happen in the sky"- Aurora, Comet, and Eclipse respectively.
The same rule applies to the character portraits
And the actual characters themselves- mostly (for example, Pyramid Head is under "Wales" for icons but "K20" for character data)
We don't know the file names of most teasers, though due to the website (Bilibili) this was uploaded to we were able to see it. I assume the above is where you got the bit about them being named after countries from.
2 -
I haven't fully followed that website or the actual file names or anything. I just remember with the 4th anniversary it was brought up. I'm not one for theorizing based on minor details.
Edit:Also I apologize for not saying thank you for the information and I hope you have a good day.
0 -
At first I believed it bot now I'm not so sure.
0 -
Both but his first ever line was I'm still here
0 -
Normally thya are named chapter xviii teaser finally. ect
Personally I find it weird how it dosent even mention chapter anything. It very well could be human error but I've taken note of that
0 -
It's not weird at all, they just got tired of all the incessant Fnaf posts and "accidentally" leaked it so they'd get them to stop posting.
1 -
It's entirely possible that it could just be a legal thing they have to do for this specific IP, since we never see the contract.
Using the name of the IP without permission could go to legal hell, and then why get the permission to use the name of the IP with no content just for a red herring?
1 -
It can still be FNAF tho!!!!!!!! 1987 bite of 87!!!
6 -
I'm so glad it's not FNAF, only due that crowd of FNAF fanboys being a pain in the forums.
1 -
Well still weird to me
0 -
What's "weird" about it? Leaks are not an uncommon occurance, and I don't see anything about the timing or nature of this particular leak that doesn't add up compared to a typical leak.
2 -
Like I said, Weird to me
0 -
But how?
0 -
Just is
Gut feeling
0 -
It's clearly a Red Herring for the Friday The 13th chapter quote me on that.
0 -
To be fair, it would be true Scott Cawthon fashion to be promoting around a specific thing while leaving easter eggs of something else, that are red herrings for the true thing.
Heck, I wouldnt even be surprised if both licences were aquired and to be released right after each other. Every single post has had something hinting at Hellraiser or FNaF. Hellraiser is quite more likely since some devs wanted him to join the club in chapter 21, but I do like to point out, that you cannot really start placing easter eggs of licensed material as promotional material, without having access to the license to use it. Seeing as Springtrap has been made quite visible on the background, that means they have at the very least had access to using the character like that.
So either way, it's just Hellraiser for chapter 21 with the devs having the license to use Springtrap in promotional material as just a red herring, or Hellraiser for chapter 21 with Springtrap being on the horizon too. And people are like "yeah, but they made us think Candyman too", the thing is, when was any actual candyman imagery used? In this case, we have 3 cases of Springtrap actively being in the background, that's very different as to "hinting" at another killer.
So I agree, the next chapter is confirmed to be Hellraiser, but I'd also say that "FNaF confirmed" is a fair statement to make aswell, just not for chapter 21, but perhaps 22. It wouldnt be the first time 3 licensed killers are released in a row.
1 -
This content has been removed.
-
It's not a leak, and therefore allowed under forum rules.
2 -
You were not around when Ghostface was accidentally leaked inside the game itself before his real planned release were you? lol
5 -
No guys, my uncle works at BHVR and assured me it's still gonna be a FNAF chapter.
They're gonna release Pinhead into the game for like a week or so just to be removed and replaced by a FNAF monster afterwards.
It's all part of the massive red herring they doing to us trust me 🤡
4 -
Sounds to me like being in some level of denial purely for the sake of it.
5 -
I doubt that was the reason but I wouldn't be surprised if it was 😫
2 -
They could but with how many people have seen it n0w it wouldn't do anything because it would just gat reposted
0 -
Well if you think about it, Freddy's Pizzeria is kind of hell
And the animatronics are raised from the dead
So it's a Springtrap trailer, case closed.
0 -
The fact I cannot tell if you're serious or not hurts me inside
5 -
H e l l r a i s e r
You can make Heels Liar.
So it's a succubus inspired from Fnaf.
0 -
or... they have a weird feeling about it.
because that's a normal thing that happens with everyone... about pretty much anything.
which is why a "bad omen" is a concept that exists on all cultures
2 -
I stand by what I said.
0 -
Not denial.
Just feels too good to be true.
[Edit] Also how the heck am I in denial if I just think it's weird. Never said who was gonna be the killer. Just said feels weird.
1 -
In that case, I think some people might have doubts becouse bhvr seemingly dumped hellraiser clues like it's garbage, while taking an extremely subtle approach with all the other releases last few years, and even in the first half of this very release. Combine it with weirdness like pin not being a pin, but a nail; flower looking similar, but at the same time very different from what it was in a movie; HELLRAISE_ still missing an R for some reason, and you still got some room for speculation. Which in my opinion is great, but for some reason it makes folks really aggressive, though that's probably just their own problems bursting out in a form of internet media toxicity.
2 -
Saying "seems too good to be true" is pretty much what being in denial is.
2 -
That's a really weird way to spell Candyman
1 -
More I think about it, the more I'm not being persuaded until 100% confirmation. When has behaviour ever been obvious like this before with their clues? Never, so why would they start now. It could be something we least expect.It's definitely a licence but what? And before anyone starts on me I don't care what the chpater is, a new chapter is just more content for me no matter what it is. It's like their want us to think it's Pinhead, we need to think outside the box to figure this out possibly
2 -
Um.....I am just saying that. Not denying the evidence we have is fake I am saying just looks too good.
Kinda like finding the pepper jack cheese for a sandwich just to realize I had not bought Pepper jack Cheese in 6 months after taking a bite.
Again not denying anything, so maybe not try and not diagnose what my meaning is literally.
0 -
You're not heavily denying it, but you are denying it. :P
0 -
All I am denying is your saying I am denying.
1 -
You'd be wrong, but that's okay.
0 -
When has behaviour ever been obvious like this before with their clues?
With the teasers for Bubba, Pig, Freddy and Myers.
Myers's teaser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCK-Ecigz68
Bubba's teaser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiGsh8RjAt0
Freddy's teaser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy8zb6pZTWI
Pig's teaser (probably the most obvious): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGDS9XYdKnc
4 -
OK so how am I wrong if I deny that you are saying I am denying?
All I said was clues are just too good. Never said once that "Oh killer is not gonna be Pin Head but Fred Flintstone"
That's denial
0 -
I thought leaks weren't allowed to be discussed about?
1 -
Ah, that brings back memories, then they started being vague with their teasers. Even cutting licence teasers out completely, correct me if I'm wrong but we never got a Stranger Things teaser did we?
1 -
Simple. Because that is not the only thing that you are denying. You are also denying that it's definitely gonna be Pinhead at this point. :P
0 -
They aren't... so, yeah.
1 -
If the Leak comes directly from BHVR it's fine, this is a BHVR screw up so it stays.
1 -
You just said that is the only thing I am denying is you saying I am denying than you also I deny Pin head.....which is it?
Cause again I am saying clues look too good to be true. Not saying "Oh clues are fake".
I know its gonna be Pin head but the clues just feel off to me though I am not in denial which you lovely keep mentioning.
1 -
If you know it's gonna be Pinhead, then you don't think it's too good to be true. You can't say "I know it's gonna be Pinhead" and also say "the clues are too good to be true." They are contradictory to each other. If you think it's the first one, then you are not in denial about that, but then you don't actually believe that the clues are too good to be true because you do agree with the conclusion they point to. If you think it's the second one, then you don't actually believe it's gonna be Pinhead and thus are in denial.
1 -
Ok so how about this.
Clearly your just gonna drag this on until you wanna hear what you want so just gonna say this again finale time since kinda getting fed up.
I am not in denial.
I just think its weird/off but does not mean it is to everybody.
I can have my own opinion on the matter without people forcing me to change.
So there, now leave it alone.
2 -
You're allowed to have your own opinion. That being said, I am allowed to have the opinion that your stance doesn't make sense.
1 -
True but does not mean gotta keep saying "you're in denial" all the time.
1
