What license do you not want for DBD?

Althou i don't believe in limiting dlc choices, there are some i generally just find uninteresting, such as-

• Dead Space
• Any superhero comic related villains like scarecrow
• Bioshock
• Ghostbusters
• Us
• Sirenhead
• Scary movie
• Little Nightmare
• F.E.A.R
• Dying Light
• Death Note
• Castlevania

Anything related to Comic books or Scooby Doo

I would be fine with a small charm or maybe an outfit that's slightly similar to the reference like Folktales sets aka Riding Hood or LFD2 outfits.

Does not make sense to have a childhood cartoon IP being slaughtered or Powerful comic book characters reduced to a helpless being or being a hindered killer that's using 1% of power.

I only really like the IP's from the DBDleaks killer poll in the top 4

Candyman - Imagine waiting another 4 months just because they introduced a very basic killer. Poor mans doctor and I can't fathom why it's so often asked for.

FNAF - Don't need the clashes between the community. The killer concept works, but I'm not a fan of the genre.

Whatever the twitter bots are coming up with these days.

In my opinion it doesn't make sense, the entity is targeting earth, why would it take a killer from elsewhere?

The only ones I am against are ones like Jeepers Creepers or other simalar franchises with scummy benefactors if a DLC for it is added.

Aside from that most Anime horror not because I think there is anything wrong with them just I don't know how they would be added to DBD as there is quite a dramatic artstyle shift.

• Dead Space?!?

c'mon...

... who said it only targets earth? it can easily be targeting sentient life.

how so? scooby and the gang deal with actual supernatural ######### all the time... in the movies.

Anything that's target demographic is kids in middle school/junior high and younger - Coraline, FNAF, Scooby Doo, Scary Stories, etc. It's one thing for kids to play an adult game (it's going to happen with any game), it's another to encourage them to play an adult game by bringing in franchises that target kids for their audience.

Yes Dead Space, it doesn't interest me in the slightest as a dlc.

I can't think of any licenses I "don't want", there's licenses I'm not personally interested in but nothing I'm like "this license would make the game worse." The more the merrier I say!

There are some licenses though that I think could be mechanically tough to do or to make fun to play, and a couple of licenses that I just don't see them doing thematically:

• Final Destination - I'm a fan of the movies, and the idea of killing survivors using the environment is kind of cool. It's hard to imagine how it would mechanically be done in the game though.
• Jack Torrance from The Shining and Norman Bates from Psycho - I'd love to see the hotel and or topiary maze from The Shining or the Bates Motel but both these killers would just be guys walking around with axes or whatever. Hard to imagine how they'd make them mechanically fun to play.
• Hannibal Lector - An awesome bad guy on film for sure! But his whole thing is about psychologically manipulating and outsmarting people and I have no idea how they would make him a fun killer to play.
• Jaws - I would instant buy an April Fools DLC which let you play Jaws as a killer. Just a giant fin swimming around through the ground and a shark pops up to attack people. 😄 They'd never do it though.
• The Omen - Omen is a great movie but they'd never do a killer who's a child. (Closest we'd get would be Sam Neal from Omen 3. 😕)

Demogorgon is from a parallel dimension, still on earth.

It never gave any indication towards it, the the observer's entries all characters were humans or creatures found in earth.

The Grudge. Sadako is already close enough.

I mean they can go ahead and bring them in if they want, they just wouldn't be very interesting to me compared to other IPs they could do.

FNAF for the controversy issues and lets be honest we dont want the fnaf fans here its bad enough already in DBD

Scooby Doo... its a cartoon..not scary