+10% base speed for both killer/surv
DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensity
agree?
Comments
-
But in a stream when PTB of 2.4.0 devs say they will never make survivors speed increase to 100% or above so nope
0 -
@BACKSTABBER said:
DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensityagree?
Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
Also latency would become an even bigger problem0 -
@Master said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensityagree?
Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
Also latency would become an even bigger problem+10% extra base speed for both
0 -
@BACKSTABBER said:
@Master said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensityagree?
Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
Also latency would become an even bigger problem+10% extra base speed for both
Its a mathematical difference, are we talking about percentage points or about actual percentages of the percentage values? Either its 125 or 126.5 then
0 -
@Master said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
@Master said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensityagree?
Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
Also latency would become an even bigger problem+10% extra base speed for both
Its a mathematical difference, are we talking about percentage points or about actual percentages of the percentage values? Either its 125 or 126.5 then
If the aim is just to speed up the game and affect balance it should be 126.5
0 -
Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?1
-
That's exactly what i was thinking.@Master said:@BACKSTABBER said:
@Master said:
@BACKSTABBER said:
DBD would have more action, more frenetic, more intensityagree?
Do you mean 110 vs 125 or 110 vs 126.5, the first would would be a killer nerf.
Also latency would become an even bigger problem+10% extra base speed for both
Its a mathematical difference, are we talking about percentage points or about actual percentages of the percentage values? Either its 125 or 126.5 then
0 -
I would actually rather slow down the game, aren't we trying to slow games down?
2 -
@Raptorrotas said:
Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?In a certain way yes, but killers would close the distance faster (with a speed of 126.5) and would have more map pressure, so it would compensate. Pallet and windows would probably be more necessary than ever in chases and loops wouldn't be as strong as now. It would be an interesting change to test in a PTB
0 -
@White_Owl said:
@Raptorrotas said:
Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?In a certain way yes, but killers would close the distance faster (with a speed of 126.5) and would have more map pressure, so it would compensate. Pallet and windows would probably be more necessary than ever in chases and loops wouldn't be as strong as now. It would be an interesting change to test in a PTB
If the base speed gets increased, and killers gets proportionally increased ( 110/ 126.5), then the time X to "catch up" to the survivor theoretically stays the same, while both sides cover more distance. The problem thus is that survivors get easier chances to utilise pallets ( more distance covered after window or pallet)
This would be worse if it'd be increased additionally (110/125).While map pressure might increase for everyone except nurse I still think both cases are survivor favored.
0 -
No. The speed of the game is just perfect.
0 -
Only speed that needs to change is generator speed
0 -
@Raptorrotas said:
@White_Owl said:
@Raptorrotas said:
Might be wrong bzt wouldnt this allow survivors to get more pallets/ windows more easily in a chase?In a certain way yes, but killers would close the distance faster (with a speed of 126.5) and would have more map pressure, so it would compensate. Pallet and windows would probably be more necessary than ever in chases and loops wouldn't be as strong as now. It would be an interesting change to test in a PTB
If the base speed gets increased, and killers gets proportionally increased ( 110/ 126.5), then the time X to "catch up" to the survivor theoretically stays the same, while both sides cover more distance. The problem thus is that survivors get easier chances to utilise pallets ( more distance covered after window or pallet)
This would be worse if it'd be increased additionally (110/125).While map pressure might increase for everyone except nurse I still think both cases are survivor favored.
Actually no, because you must look at relative speed. Currently killers move at 0.6 m/s relative to survivors (in a straight line) while with the changed speeds they would move at 0.66 m/s (10% faster). Not much, but it would make catching up faster.
0
