We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

Good Reasons why should BHVR balance around Solo queue?

2

Comments

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    I could be wrong. I could be right. All i know is, that the information level for both solos and SWF have increased.

    Take the exposed status for example. Years ago, before the icons where introduced in an attempt to bring solos and SWF to the same information level, survivors didn´t knew they were exposed until the killer hit them. Even a injured survivor wasn´t sure, if he was downed by a normal hit or exposed hit.

    Now everyone knows that they are exposed. Independently if the downed survivor was injured or not. This took a major surprise effect away and is something the devs have to take into consideration for whatever they´ll finally do.

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    Yes! Its really hard. I just want, that solos and SWF have the exact same starting point for information. Which is comms.

    Killers get starved on information on their hud, while survivors are saturated. At one point it has to be enough.

  • Gwinty
    Gwinty Member Posts: 981

    This is a harsh topic.

    First and formost because we are dealing with our SoloQ teammates and we all have our tale to tell. Playing like this led me to the conclusion that more information are not the way to go if you want to buff soloQ to SWF level. I took Kindred, I too Empathic Connection, Aftercare, Better together, Blast Mine...and the amount of survivors who used that information was just not worth it.


    However I would argue that we should differ between making soloQ able to play at the level of SWF and them actually living up to it. Maybe we should ignore that people do not use the information and just give it to them. Then they can blame their team for not doing anything.


    I played a lot of duoQ yesterday. Me and my friend tried out a bunch of different perk combos, did the archives and some more. Most times when the game went south it was because we had a teammate with Self Care or Urban Evasion who did nothing. Otherwise we got 2/3 escapes, mostly with one of us dying.

    Now, I am not a good survivor. But the information about how bad Self Care is now is written on the perk. I was even using a healing build with Empathic Connection and Botany Knowledge and those survivors would just ignore me...


    Long story short: Buffing SoloQ with information will not do it, because many will ignore it.

    Any other approach however would buff SWF.

    I would still argue for more information for survivors. At least show them who is getting chased, we already know that the mechanic is there for the obsession. Why not add that for the other survivors too? SWF already know who is getting chased and it would make rescues more easy.

  • Phasmamain
    Phasmamain Member Posts: 11,534

    We’re better off with a pinging system similar to apex or VHS. Gives good info but doesn’t force people to use voice chat to play optimally

    With how bad this community is I know I wouldn’t use voice chat in 90% of my matches which would lead to people annoyed at others for not using it. The ping system is easy to use and doesn’t force you to talk with randoms

  • bigbeefynacho
    bigbeefynacho Member Posts: 351

    I know a lot of you are going to hate this, but they need to implement proximity chat. Include a mut option for anyone who doesn't want to be on mic. Just communicating with only one person in an swf can be extremely helpful. I often play only with my son, and we are very successful even though we are playing with two randoms. NBA2k has a proximity chat in their game that actually works. Includes is a mute option to silence any toxic players in the game. I honestly don't understand why a lot of people frown on this idea.

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    As you said, with how our community is, a ping system could be equally as annoying. Spamming pings.

    But yeah, a chatwheel could be nice.

  • syain
    syain Member Posts: 440

    I don't think killers should get buffed any further until us solo survivors can do half of what a SWF can without needing to sacrifice an entire perk build only to have one tenth of the information a discord voice chat provides. Removing SWF is off the table, as proven by the many discussions here I've seen over the past year, and completely nerfing all of the killers that are too oppressive for solos would mean they would no longer be able to compete with strong premade groups.

    If BHVR did find a way to buff solo queue for it to be comparable to SWF, weak killers should be buffed next, however if the stronger killers continue to be overpicked and overperform, I don't see why they shouldn't go for nerfs.

  • Zarathos
    Zarathos Member Posts: 1,911
    edited July 2022

    The buff to swf would be small at most tbh. For solo queue it drastically improve solo queue. The biggest causalty of a ping system is hex totems. If no action is taken and the communicatiom changes are pu in as people suggest these perks will likely be far to weak.

    I wouldnt mind hex totems being weaker if the solo queue problem is fixed sooner rather then later.

  • cburton311
    cburton311 Member Posts: 410

    Ideally, solo queue should be brought up to be equal to SWF in strength by means that won't affect the swfs. Then the game could be rebalanced fairly.

    I'd settle for using data to determine the difference in success rate and applying a modifier to the effective MMR used to form the group. SWF's have an extra +100 MMR or something. Or solo's get a -100... you get the point.

  • Shenshen
    Shenshen Member Posts: 256

    The thing is, it is not a matter of opinion, it's a fact that action icons need to be in the game, I've read all your comments and the value soloQ players get from action icons and base Kindred is so incredibly high, it doesn't matter that SWF also would get a side effect buff. In-Game voice chat wouldn't work here in Europe and I personally, have zero interest in talking to strangers and even think it would be the worst way to address soloQ.

  • Seraphor
    Seraphor Member Posts: 9,429
    edited July 2022

    Pings should be under your control. You do something to ping everyone else's location, you don't ping your location to other players.

    Ideally a base feature where you can hold a button while otherwise unoccupied. This isn't then always available, because you can't use it while repairing a gen, or perhaps even while sprinting, but you can stop what you're doing at any time to ping other survivors and get an idea where everyone is.

  • Kaitsja
    Kaitsja Member Posts: 1,838

    Action icons as in what each survivor is doing at any given moment. In a three-man SWF, three of the four players are on comms. They're already communicating if they're on gens, if they're healing, if they're in chase or if they're going for an unhook. Where does this leave the fourth?

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095
  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    The problem with "small" changes is. That they get blown out of proportion by our community. The last patch is the best example

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    Its just that survivors often ignore Kindred. Having it basekit would mean that killers would have to get a compensation buff. Since, you know, devs can´t buff one side without also buffing the other.

    All for something that might get ignored.

  • Kaitsja
    Kaitsja Member Posts: 1,838
    edited July 2022

    It leaves them without information. Let's say Survivor A & B are on gens, Survivor C is in chase, and Survivor D is near Survivor C unsure of whether or not it's safe to work the nearby gen. If Survivor D had information to tell them what their teammates are doing, they'd know they can jump on the gen.

    This information doesn't benefit the 3-man SWF because they already have this information via comms. A & B already know that C is in chase. A knows B is on a gen, and vice-versa. The information benefits Survivor D because they're solo-queue.

  • Marigoria
    Marigoria Member Posts: 6,090

    No, and you know pretty well in game voice chat would be useless in EU servers with the amount of russians in the lobby who refuse to speak english.

  • Iron_Cutlass
    Iron_Cutlass Member Posts: 3,350

    More information, maybe have some UI showing what people are doing, maybe possible dialogue options to tell others what to do and coordinate better. Voice/Proximity Chat wouldnt be a terrible option, but in areas with people speaking multiple languages it might not be as helpful of a solution (EU) (also the community is not at all against V/PC, the developers have made it very clear that they dont want to add V/PC due to it not being super accessible with multiple languages involved).

    Also if you bring SoloQ up to the level of SWF, maybe you can balance the game better? Maybe you dont have the survivor community completely split over the way they queue into a match? There is clearly an issue with SoloQ just overall being a worse experience so it shouldnt be ignored because the killer got bullied once or twice, everyone has rough matches from time to time, it's not that huge of a deal.

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903
    edited July 2022

    First, I don't believe so. Matches with SWF are way more common. Pure solo groups are maybe around the 10%

    Second, if the solos have issues (beside the throwers and the MMR putting differently skilled players together) then the solution is to alleviate these issues, not to pull everything down to that level.

    There are a few suggestions about this on the appropriate part of the forum.

  • RatbasterdJr
    RatbasterdJr Member Posts: 702

    literally not a single person has mentioned buffing killers? Did you even read the thread?

  • premiumRICE
    premiumRICE Member Posts: 798

    none, people should just git gud

  • csandman1977
    csandman1977 Member Posts: 2,358

    Base kindred. Make bond map wide. Icons for actions which they are working on. Perks shown in lobby. Won't give swfs any extra and gives solo so much more to work with

  • jajay119
    jajay119 Member Posts: 1,093

    I think action statuses are a good idea. If you can see someone is repairing a gen you might want to find them and hop on. Likewise if you're hooked and the other three survivors status icons show they're literally not doing anything then there'll be more pressure for one of them to actually rescue. Twice I was left on the hook to die from the first hook yesterday.

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    My German at this point (and I'm sorry for how badly I'll write these) :

    • dankesheun
    • bittesheun
    • freulein
    • ichliebedich
    • schadenfreude

    All said with a very thick French accent ...

    I may be able to understand words that are similar in Dutch or English but that it. Oh, there is also "arbeit" (アルバイト), which is equally unhelpful in this context >_>.

    It'll go well 😂

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    You´re all making very good points. Thank you for the discussion. Devs will probably introduce some icons that show what every survivor is doint at all times. Which... knowing our community... will result in great endgame chats full of accusations. Because someone did one thing instead of another.

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    Yeah after having some reconsideration about our community. Uhm... i´d say we´re doomed 😅

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    One icon that could be fine is telling if and which survivor is in a chase, similar to the obsession but for everyone.

    That's not much, but it's one of the things that I miss as a solo survivor (compared to my SWF days)

  • rvzrvzrvz
    rvzrvzrvz Member Posts: 940


    In 2021 it was 54% solo players, even if we assume that solo players have dropped since SBMM it's probably still between 40-50% solo players, I doubt that pure solo groups are only 10%

  • Raptorrotas
    Raptorrotas Member Posts: 3,253

    Wrong.

    The SWF now gets that info without the need to actually use "brainpower"/current awareness/remember to ask for it.

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    Thats an interesting chart. Especially since its from 2019.

  • Kaitsja
    Kaitsja Member Posts: 1,838

    Do explain how you've come to that conclusion, because part of playing with friends is volunteering information. It would be a huge buff to solos, and wouldn't benefit SWF at all since they're already relaying that information to each other.

    They could always just remove endgame chat. Console doesn't have it and we do just fine without the extra toxicity.

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903
    edited July 2022


    It's just something I've measured during the night games. So of course there is some discrepancy with global numbers : groups don't form easily during the day. Solos were usually with and SWF3 and and SWF2 and very rarely as four single.

    If you look at the graph, it kind of makes perfect sense.

    The SWF3 has to be completed by a solo, so you can remove their height from the solo one, that's about 10%

    Then there is almost 30% that can go in the SWF2: statistically, only half of SWF2 will be fitted together 15%, times two for the solos obviously.

    Which means that globally there are (50 - 10 - 15 * 2 = ) 10% of purely solo groups.



    When I did that night-time measurement, what I got was: SWF4 : 20% SWF3 : 40% SWF2 x 2 : 10% SWF2 + solos x 2 : 10% Solos x 4 : 6%

    My solo number of 6% is lower than the 10% I've used in the previous post. Since it was night-time I was assuming the number was higher for a whole day (when friends were busy at work or something) so I've doubled and rounded it for safety.

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    I know, but the reasoning and results are strictly the same.

  • Chaos999
    Chaos999 Member Posts: 869

    Solo queue needs to have most if not all of the advantages that an average SWF has.

    This is info on everyones whereabouts and activities, some way to comunicate, preferably with an extended "buttons" system AND optional built-in voice chat. Definitely basekit kindred.

    This would not only make solo queue closer to SWFs, but it would also encourage casual solos to partner up with randos they feel an affinity with in a much more organic and straightforward way, without all of them needing to use 3rd party apps they might not want to use.

    The highest echelon of SWFs definitely has more info than this, such as killer location on demand, but honestly, it's not free. If a group of players can coordinate on this level they definitely deserve the reward for it

    Once this is achieved, game can be balanced around this much more leveled play field and lead to fairer, more enjoyable game for the majority of players and scenarios

  • Raptorrotas
    Raptorrotas Member Posts: 3,253
    • devs add action icon
    • All survivoes now instaneously see actions
    • Swfs dont need to use comms for that anymore, because swfs still are survivors.


    I'm not sayong it'd be bad to try to close the gap. But its asinine to pretend such buffs wouldnt benefit swfs too. Depending on which info is added for free, it might help swf even more.

    Tldr:

    Anything added to survivor can be used by "solo" and "swf"

  • sulaiman
    sulaiman Member Posts: 3,219

    Well, i think saying 50% being solo queue is not generous, because we know the statistics.

    i dont share your opinion at all, because i like the lack of information in this game as solo survivor. You can never bring solo up to swf, because bespite the information advantage, which you cannot get with icons (nor with a chat option, because here in europe i often play with people i dont share any language with). But even if you could, you cant make random teammates as reliable as swf. You cannot make them do gens to help the team instead of hidding, you cannot make them not dc or hook suicide because they dont like the killer.

    The solution is to have one queue for solo survivors, and one queue for swf, both balanced around the information (or lack of) the team has.

    As long as you dont do this, there is a power difference between solo and swf, and the further you buff killer to be able to handle swf, the more solo got thrown under the bus. If you nerf the killer to give solo a fair chance, you are back where they cant keep up with swf.

    I really don´t think there is a solution other than splitting it up and balancing both queues differently, so both are equally fair, giving killers no reason to dodge swf.

  • rvzrvzrvz
    rvzrvzrvz Member Posts: 940
    edited July 2022

    Hmm ok I guess, I played solo 99% of the time for 1000h so I have a hard time believing we're only 10%, it looks like bhvr is balancing the game around 3-4man SWF for sure so you must be right, solo players like me should just play killer tbh (until they add a few qol changes for us)

  • Splinterverse
    Splinterverse Member Posts: 445

    I'm not going to offer specific suggestions on what should be done, but I will say that solo queue should be a priority.

    People should be able to buy the game and play it without having to get on Discord AND have a decent experience. If being in a SWF is truly required, we should be using in-game systems for comms so that it becomes apparent quickly.

    Otherwise, attention should be paid to balance for solo queue.

    It should be fairly easy to make things function differently (if necessary) for solo queue and SWF because the game clearly knows if you are in a group. Now that assumes that the group is using comms, which is not necessarily the case. Still, it can be reasonably assumed.

    People act like the SWF experience is always a joy. There are many reasons people might not want to play with comms . . . anxiety, hassle, bad connections, toxicity of some of those on comms, etc. We can't balance around only SWF.

  • DragonMasterDarren
    DragonMasterDarren Member Posts: 2,871

    something as simple as a chat wheel would be a buff to Solo Q without also being a buff to SWF

  • ashtonisfarout
    ashtonisfarout Member Posts: 101

    Sadly I don't think there's anything they can do other than split them into separate modes. Let all the weak players go play with their friends while the rest of us can challenge ourselves. I'd take longer Q times if I never had to play with another swf team. SWF IS the problem.

  • Kaitsja
    Kaitsja Member Posts: 1,838

    I fail to see how it would benefit SWF in any way whatsoever given that it's information they already have via comms, and to just exclusively rely on the icons would defeat the purpose of being on comms in the first place.

    Splitting the queues is a terrible idea and has been discussed to death about how it would kill the game. SWF would never get any games because why play against a team that can communicate when you can just have easy games against solos?

    SWF would quit the game altogether, while Solos would suffer even more, and the only ones who are happy in the end are killers. SWF is not the problem.

  • Coffeecrashing
    Coffeecrashing Member Posts: 3,843

    It’s a buff to SWFs that don’t use voice communication.

  • csandman1977
    csandman1977 Member Posts: 2,358

    What's aftercare? Joking. Bond, kindred and other aura reading perks would need reworks.