The DBD tournament in a nutshell
The russians might've won officially but it was a dirty win. We know who really won.
Comments
-
Everyone loses
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
@RemoveSWF said:
@Easylife said:
Was there some controversy over something to do with a hatch stand off?
I'm in the UK and only just woke up but I was in Cahlaflowers channel just now and the gist of it was something to do with a hatch and commentators not knowing the rules or something.
Anyone know what happened?There was a stupid rule involving a hatch standoff - the person who saw the hatch first wins the game. They both saw it at the same time, the game ended in a draw with two deaths and two escapes.
This led to a rematch with Marth as killer (Nurse, obviously) and another draw - two escapes and two kills. Tournament Monsters played killer next, killed three with one escape.
De-Pip Squad lost fair and square.
Sharing this comment here from another thread for relevance.
0 -
@allychaan said:
The russians might've won officially but it was a dirty win. We know who really won.
you forgot this gem. https://clips.twitch.tv/YawningShyLettuceRedCoat
2 -
@RemoveSWF said:
There's already a thread about this - https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/5338/de-pip-squad-lose-tournamentMarth lost fair and square.
To some fanboys, this is like finding out that Santa isn't real.
Can you stop trolling?
1 -
Zagrid said:
@RemoveSWF said:
There's already a thread about this - https://forum.deadbydaylight.com/en/discussion/5338/de-pip-squad-lose-tournamentMarth lost fair and square.
To some fanboys, this is like finding out that Santa isn't real.
Can you stop trolling?
forum trolling = having an opinion and saying it.
3 -
Marth didn't hit the survivor because he was at the hatch which meant due to the rules he won. At no point did anyone say anything about the hatch having to be physically open until right at the point it happened. The hatch does not need to be open for it to be a standoff. The standoff starts the moment both Survivor and killer are at the hatch at the same time.
3 -
If you want to be technical about it, then technically that survivor should have won because they were there first. They were clearly there waiting behind the tree for it to open, before marth got there. Just because he wasn’t standing directly on top of it doesn’t mean he wasn’t there first.1
-
@jessie_12 said:
If you want to be technical about it, then technically that survivor should have won because they were there first. They were clearly there waiting behind the tree for it to open, before marth got there. Just because he wasn’t standing directly on top of it doesn’t mean he wasn’t there first.I think Jessie here is right, if the rule is who ever -seen- the hatch first is the wording of the rule clearly she got there first on it or not.
3