DBD prime is currently liable for false advertisement.
the new skin isnt exclusive. If anyone is bored and wants to sue, you could
Comments
-
Assembling my legal team as we speak. Not just going for BHVR, Amazon too. I'm going to have Bezo's head on a stick
58 -
I agree.
In fact we're not getting any exclusive content. On top of that the content we get is miserable. I would rather see massive amounts of bp/iri or like 500 auric cells instead so I can buy a character/perks with it.
3 -
BHVR "Case Closed"
27 -
Such a huge L
2 -
BHVR and Bezos right now:
29 -
nah thats just the event thing
2 -
Is this not even a recolor???
0 -
Nope. I can't even redeem the code because I already got the item from the rift.
23 -
Send him to the Entity's realm.
4 -
Looking forward to the new survivor!
12 -
Currently the skin is exclusively complimentary to Prime members /s
2 -
There is a difference between a promo blurb and an EULA.
1 -
You joke but before he lost his mind that's how they bought Hybridpanda's loyalty.
0 -
There's still nothing anyone could do because they never said every cosmetic was exclusive it could fall into the "other special offers" category and that's all they would have to say there would be no lawsuit unless they claimed that everything was exclusive which they never did, the lawsuit would never see daylight
4 -
You could even say that the argument would be dead by daylight
3 -
Serious question: Is there a place for complaints in the amazon page?
0 -
Uhm. „[…,] and other special offers.“ right there behind your marked text in the screenshot..
also the cosmetic is exclusive in a way as it can’t be obtained in any other way currently (or has it been added to the in-game shop?)
like. Yeah I also think it’s a bad choice. And I would still consider it bad even if it was a recolor. But why do so many people get so unreasonable with their complaints?
1 -
I'm not sure what kind of damages you could even sue for, because nowhere have they specified:
- How many items you receive per month, or
- The average value of the items you receive in a month, or
- That the items offered to you must fall into one of those advertised categories.
Any judge would dismiss such a lawsuit on its face as there's no way you could reasonably claim damages when offered a free in-game cosmetic that you already own.
In fact, the title of this post could be viewed as defamatory as it accuses Amazon/BHVR of a crime. OP, even if you are memeing here, what you're doing is legally risky.
1 -
As a reminder, the cosmetic is not "free". It is part of a package that is paid for. The actual value may only be a penny, but it still a value. That said, this wouldn't make it to actual trial due to the fact that they have themselves covered with the vagueness of the wording.
0 -
Try on amazon prime twitter
1 -
So if devs release eventually the guardian maiden skin on shop we can denounce them?
0 -
You don't even have to go EULA/TOS diving to realize that's not the case, it says right there in your screenshot "... and other special offers". That's not referring to something with a particular "specialness level", that's an extremely general term that can basically mean anything under the sun.
0 -
It's a fairly meaningless semantic difference, to be honest. It's not "free" in that you have to pay for Prime to get the offer, but it is "free" in the sense that if Prime had exactly the same offers this month except this one skin, they wouldn't be in material breach of any contract as there's absolutely no written guarantee how many offers you get each month.
Basically, the offers are not technically fungible, but they effectively are (in this context, anyway).
0 -
No, that was for their inner event lol
0 -
"And other special offers". Your highlighting didn't go far enough xD
0 -
yes you can contact the amazon support.
at least for me it was a waste of time.
0
