The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Will the mori update kill the game?

GoingToGetDwight
GoingToGetDwight Member Posts: 90
edited November 5 in General Discussions

I have a feeling the mori update will kill the game, because the hatch is not even allow anymore due to the killer not bothering to put the third survivor on the hook and just look for the last person, tunnelling is on the rise like every game now. i don't think this is good for survivors in general. the game is way too killer sided now days please dont mention swf they are irreverent.

Comments

  • Prometheus1092
    Prometheus1092 Member Posts: 398

    I know you said don't mention swf but from my experience, lower MMR is heavily killer sided as it's got a lot more solo players. Higher MMR with swf players is balanced... Possibly survivor sided but definitely not killer sided

  • A_T_E
    A_T_E Member Posts: 157

    Due to the Killer not bothering to put the third Victim on the hook

    The term 'slugging' is common nomenclature for putting a Victim in the "dying state" for an extended amount of time.

    Slugging for 4K refers to your described scenario, with the Killer looking for the 4th Victim without hooking 3rd, slugged Victim.

    It can occur, but isn't as common as many on this forum makes it sound like. It happened before 4K free mori, and it will happen again even if free mori is removed.

    If you do not wish to be slugged, bring the Victim perk "Unbreakable", but don't get yourself up unless it's very end game or the Killer is actually trying to slug for 4K. 😀

  • drsoontm
    drsoontm Member Posts: 4,903

    Don't forget the role of the MMR is to push for these numbers. You put a high MMR player with lower MMR ones against a high MMR player and you know how it will end.

    It also depend on the killer, perks, addons, tools, playstyle …

    It's difficult to say one side is favored at high MMR when you get matches were you know there is nothing you could have done, except being extremely lucky. And I say that for both sides.

  • GoingToGetDwight
    GoingToGetDwight Member Posts: 90
    edited November 5

    Just had a game where some wraith went looking for a dwight on the other side of the map for a mori 4k

  • Prometheus1092
    Prometheus1092 Member Posts: 398

    It's supposed to slightly killer sided that's what the devs aim for that's why I said balanced. The map can play a part in making it more survivor sided if it's a survivor sided map but generally it's balanced around swf. Balanced being slightly killer sided.

  • Prometheus1092
    Prometheus1092 Member Posts: 398

    I often do that. I had a match where there I pretty much took out 2 survivors by the time 1 gen was done (they were both trying to go for saves near eachother). I ended up carrying the 3rd survivor around the map to find the 4th. In that situation I won the match hands down so like hell I'm going to allow someone doing nothing to get the hatch.

  • GoingToGetDwight
    GoingToGetDwight Member Posts: 90

    The hatch does not result in lost mrr and does not result in a loss, its not fair that you do that.

  • Prometheus1092
    Prometheus1092 Member Posts: 398

    The hatch prevents a 4k. That 4k gives a lot more BP than 3k and possibly needed for adept achievements. Hatch results in neutral MMR for the survivor, maybe that's the issue. They are staying neutral in a MMR bracket they don't belong, if they went down then maybe they wouldn't go against brutal killers and they can get gens done so hatch wouldn't matter? Just a theory. But regardless, hiding for the hatch depriving killer of a 4k for the sake of maintaining MMR isn't fair.

  • GoingToGetDwight
    GoingToGetDwight Member Posts: 90

    Might as well move hatch then sense all you killers will be doing that either way make us run around with our heads chopped off around the map till you finally catch us.

  • A_T_E
    A_T_E Member Posts: 157

    It's entirely his decision, who are you to dictate how he wants to play or not? And if we want to get into what's fair, how is it fair that somebody doing nothing gets to escape and get a fat stack of BP for the trouble? Hardly fair.

  • GoingToGetDwight
    GoingToGetDwight Member Posts: 90
    edited November 5

    So you rather waste all of time where's one is slugged on the ground while the killer is finding the last guy? gotcha i'm almost done quitting the game because of this. so you wont have to worry about me dictating you guys for playing the game properly

  • Prometheus1092
    Prometheus1092 Member Posts: 398

    Pretty much what I been saying for a long time. If survivors can't do gens it's time to admit defeat and move on to the next game. Hiding out for the hatch just results in killers doing what I do or potentially dragging it out to server end time where both survivors get sacrificed automatically. No hatch means no reason to hide in 2 v 1 situations and no reason to slug the 3rd survivor to find the 4th.

  • A_T_E
    A_T_E Member Posts: 157

    Waste time

    If I want BP, it isn't a waste of my time. If you think your time is wasted, because you're in the end of a losing match, then perhaps DBD isn't the game for you.

    I'm almost done quitting

    Don't let the metaphorical door hit you on the way out.

    Playing the game properly

    Your way of playing is the only proper one, huh? Speak of selfishness.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,424

    I don't see it. The killer did this before.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,424

    No. You give yourself and your teammate no hope. I've had matches where it was a 3v1 super early, or it was a 2v1 with like 2 gens left, and we got all the gens done. Might not have both escaped, or even one of us, but if the gens get done that means there's a chance. All us killers play to the bitter end as well, because of that chance of winning.

  • Crowman
    Crowman Member Posts: 9,517

    The Mori update didn't change anything that wasn't already true.

    Killers would want the 4K will slug the 3rd survivor to find the last survivor, because gambling over hatch is not worth it. The way hatch works is a problem and needs changes if you want to reduce the need of killers slugging for the 4K.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 321

    What do you mean by 'us killers'? I've heard legends of people who only play one side, but it's very rare to encounter one. Like meeting a llama or Tim Curry. Are you such a creature?

  • Prometheus1092
    Prometheus1092 Member Posts: 398

    It's not fun to spend ages hunting for the survivor but it works both ways, if the survivor doesn't find it fun and is helpless then they have the choice to not hide and get the match over with. They actively choose the unfun way of hiding it out for the hatch so I took pick the unfun way of hunting them down to get the 4k. Slugging for the 4k doesn't force them to do anything, they have the choice to come out of hiding if they want to.

    Also the purpose of doing gens gets bypassed by survivors that refuse to do gens all match and just want the hatch. So to counter it yes I try avoid hatch from spawning. My point is as it stands the hatch isn't fulfilling it's purpose and encourages killers to slug, encourages survivors to neglect gens, encourages hiding in 2 v 1 situations. Even if mori was removed I think people would still slug the 3rd especially after the 2 v 1 hiding situation has got worse alongside slugging (survivors trying to avoid giving killer the mori)

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 321

    I'd disagree with this thinking. By slugging for 4k, the killer forces the last survivor into that situation. Without slugging for 4k, the hatch prevents that drawn out hunt since the killer or survivor will find the hatch and either end the match or trigger the endgame collapse. The only way this wouldn't happen is if two survivors are both trying to hide from the killer and not even trying to do gens, which I have seen as killer occasionally. I've never seen this in my survivor matches since I always try to do gens in that scenario.

    Agreed about survivors who refuse to do gens for the whole match though. If they're not even trying to do gens and just hiding instead, they doom their team and force the game into a hatch situation. I don't see this sort of thing very often, but occasionally it happens.

    Having said all that, I think I responded to a few of your comments now and while I think we have a few opposite opinions, I want to make sure you know I'm not trying to be hostile or undermine your opinions. Just wanting to discuss opposing views :D

  • SuspiciousBrownie
    SuspiciousBrownie Member Posts: 213

    The Mori update literally changes nothing. If they were gonna slug for the 4k for a Mori they would’ve slugged for the 4k without the Mori.

    Unbreakable can only be used once but you’ll hardly ever get to use it. 1 in 20 games on average because quite frankly killers don’t really slug that much if we are being honest.

    It also makes you recover 30% faster permanently which also counters slugging for the 4k. You can use Buckle Up, WGLF, Boon: Exponential, Tenacity, Flip Flop, Power struggle, Soul Gaurd, For The People. All of which counter slugging in one way or another.

    This change will not kill the game at all and seems to be a made up epidemic. I have noticed no increase in slugging at all except for the killer awkward standing on top of me for 15 seconds while they wait for the other survivor to die on hook.

  • OmegaXII
    OmegaXII Member Posts: 2,216

    Could it be that winning is fun? 3k is a win, yes, but 4k is a better win.

    That's all the reason you need.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 321

    But even when trying to get a 'better win', it's possible to treat your opponents in a way that you would like to be treated. If you find it fun to be slugged for 4k or to have to be the last survivor standing in a slug for 4k situation, then I'd say it's a solid argument. But I think most people don't like being in that situation.

    Personally, I don't mind losing a match as survivor or killer, and have fun even when a killer dominates a match or survivors are super hard to chase and manage to give me a loss. I still get to play the game in those scenarios, build my skill, etc. But slugging for 4k has never been fun for me as survivor, regardless of whether I'm the slug or the last person standing. I still remember the shock from the first time someone slugged me for 4k and to this day find it to be pretty unfair to the last survivor.

  • OmegaXII
    OmegaXII Member Posts: 2,216

    That you'll have to blame how the game is designed. Getting Kills = Wins, you can't blame people for wanting to win more honestly.

    I'm always prefer it not to be on kills but on hooks, but it is what it is now.

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 321

    Yeah, people will generally want to have what they feel is a good outcome in games.

    I think some people would play differently if they saw how their opponents felt in real time. Like would so many survivors teabag or killers tunnel or slug for 4k if they saw how it felt for the other player? But that's an issue in general with online gaming. And I definitely don't think this community is ready for comms or something similar :/

  • Xernoton
    Xernoton Member Posts: 5,842

    At this point I want them to remove the mori again just to see the meltdown when people realise that killers still slug for the 4k.

    This was a thing before the finisher mori and unless they make some drastic changes it will remain a thing.

    The killer has no reason to hook the 3rd survivor and risk the other getting hatch. None at all. You don't get more BP (you might actually get less, if that survivor escapes), you don't pip more and if your opponents are dicks, they'll flame you regardless.

  • Azarath415_YT
    Azarath415_YT Member Posts: 6

    Ok first of all, you don't just make the claim that DbD is killer sided and then say "Don't talk about SWFs" because they're "Irrelevant" and then just leave it there. Why is the game killer sided in your opinion? And then explain why you believe SWFs are irrelevant? SWFs are just good survivors which the game is full of, but they're in the same trial and well coordinated with comms, and last I checked, any good survivor can be well coordinated even in SoloQ and still manage to get a 4 man out. Even if his teammates are bad. And no the Mori update will not "kill" the game. How long have we had the Mori system? Literally since the beginning of the game. And when has BHVR decided to make it base kit for killers? Since like 2 years ago, but the idea never happened because it encouraged slugging, and now it's in the game but you can only Mori the last survivor standing which last I checked, there used to be an offering for but it doesn't exist anymore. And you've been getting Mori'd all the time so the chances of getting Mori'd as the last one standing is not gonna kill you. Like unless you're a sore loser at the game and will DC just before the Mori ends or hook death ends to tell the killer to off themselves or whatever survivors say these days, then the Mori thing will have no change on the game

  • ChiOokami
    ChiOokami Member Posts: 1

    They should add a give up option when your slugged at 2 ppl. Just recover a quarter of the bar(to prevent give up spam on ) and if the killer doesn't plan on hooking you, you give up and go to lobby keep your points and move on.