http://dbd.game/killswitch
Why can survivors taunt when they win but killers can't?
With the new surrender option, survivors can just leave rather than watch your mori, meanwhile when survivors win, you either wait out the timer or go to the exit gate to be teabagged. What's up with that? Can the killer have the option to leave once all gens are done? It would only be fair wouldn't it?
Comments
-
I think they should do two things, revoke the surrender option and also remove the hatch, I've been in too many games where people avoid the last hooked survivor to wait for the hatch or extend a game by sitting on top of a hatch waiting for the killer to show up it's kind of annoying, also remove penalties for leaving if you're just not going to deal with the hacker issues what-so-ever, man in the higher ranks this game is a hot mess, in the early ranks this game is a blast and seriously enjoyable.
-5 -
Can the killer have the option to leave once all gens are done?
I believe you'll find that the killer can, in fact end the game once gens are done. You can open the exit gates any time the gates are powered.
You can also injure, down, kill, Mori, etc survivors at the gates. If you can force an error, you might even get an extra kill or two.
And the reason survivors are getting surrender is because some killers have decided to abuse the fact that survivors can't do literally anything while downed.
Maybe it's just a lack of empathy in this community, but I'm kinda tired of hearing of killers complaining about end game where they have agency, can force the behavior to stop with base kit tools, and at worst it's two minutes. Yet this is constantly compared to slugging to bleed out, where survivors have no base kit tools, have no agency, can't speed up the process in any way, and have to wait the full 4 minutes of being humped if the killer decides to do so.
7 -
No they can't. You can open the gates but that doesn't end the game. Survivors can, and often do, hold you there until the very end of the timer just to BM. Why should killers be forced to be subjected to survivor's BM when survivors can just bail, even if the killer hasn't BMed at all. Survivors can leave if they just don't want to watch your mori. That hardly seems right.
I'm not saying survivors shouldn't have the option to surrender if the killer's being a dick, I think that's fine, I just want the system to be fair for killers too. If you had a terrible game against survivors that are obviously out of your league and you're not going to get any hooks, let alone kills, why should you be forced to wait when survivors now have the option to bail if the game doesn't go their way?
-8 -
Can the killer have the option to leave once all gens are done? It would only be fair wouldn't it?I want to say the devs discussed having other surrender options to consider. I think that killers should be able to exit once the exit gates are open.
0 -
The difference is that as a killer you have a wait time of at most 2 minutes, and you do not have to enterain it. You can go breaking pallets, doors, or whatever you might need to finish off in the map.
If a killer wants to BM you in the end game as a survivor you have to move like a snail for 3 minutes and 59 seconds while the killer humps you before finally performing the mori.
Until a survivor can force you to watch them teabag and give you 0 option to hit them out or even choose not to look, the comparison of end game BM isn't really equal in any way.
0
