GOOD-BAD killers' tier list
People usually discuss whether billy is stronger than hag, etcetera, but in this thread I would like to discuss which killers are just bad, and which are good.
(In my opinion)
Good killers: Billy, Nurse, Plague, Hag, Huntress, Freddy, Pig, Spirit.
Bad killers: Trapper, Wraith, Myers, Doctor, Leatherface, Clown, Legion, Ghostface.
No opinion (didn't play him enough): Demogorgon
Comments
-
*Stares in Myers*
How dare you
0 -
Do I have to remember you
1 how much time Myers wastes just to do what the plague can do?
2 Myers wastes so much time just to get to tier 2 sometimes.
3 Well, once you're tier 3...you still need to chase them and...get looped
0 -
Good killers:All but legion once learned
Bad killers:Legion
2 -
Mhm, don't know if we could put Huntress so high.
I mean, I know she can instant down someone and I had also with her success when I have play her, but the forum postings about her are often mixed. So, I feel a bit mixed to put her in either of your categorys. She is just a case for herself :).
And what the Trapper matters... Maybe it is because a inner trapper sleeps in me :), but I was with him always very succesfull. No matter if on low, or high ranks. That said, he could use some small buffs, like more traps at the beginning, or a shorter cd on traps laying.
1 -
All but legion ....
What about all those infinite chases that some killer *cough* Bubba *cough* wraith *cough* just suffer silently?
0 -
I never go on infinite chases with either of those two.
0 -
swap pig and myers then we gucci
0 -
Even if it was, their power don't provide any consistent map pressure/ tracking tools/ decent chase tools.
0 -
Never. Pig's ambush is really strong
0 -
Leatherface is so much better than people give him credit for
2 -
So demonstrate what you're saying with a video. Ps I want all survivors to be at least in the red ranks and have more than 1000 hours
0 -
lol, I love how you drop your claim but with no evidence or statements to back them up, but then put the burden on proof on me to prove my statement WITH a bunch of ridiculous stipulations.
I can show you a video of my friends and I beating a red rank nurse. Does that mean I get to throw her in the bad category? Nice bait XD
0 -
How about you prove to me that all the killers you listed as bad aren't actually good?
0 -
Don't think thats a solid argument...
Sometimes, someone plays dbd for a day and he is better as some people in months.
I mean, you can also see it in dbd low ranks. Sure at rank 20, all running around and trying to find their playstyle, but after my experience, already with rank18+ you can see the first in some matches that make some things better as people in higher ranks.
1 -
Huntress is very map dependent and that makes her a very hit or miss killer. But she is still strong in the right hands and especially on the right maps.
0 -
Killers can't really be defined as simply good or bad. It's more complex than that.
0 -
It is not a bait lol.
If you think what you're saying is right then demonstrate it to me.
So I can see a video where survivors can actually do something
0 -
I must show you the way of the Bing Bong
Amico mio
1 -
Well, you know what you're both right.
Omg I would have never told that discussing in the dbd forums could be so difficult. Anyway I give up, you won.
I have my school's homework to do :(, I'm not a nerd able to be so technician in a game.
0 -
Sorry, I was not trying to upset you.
It is just... Sentences like "all do this, or only those part of the playerbase matters" are often not good for a dicussion and also most times wrong.
What the topic matters: I have with you just talk about your argument, not your opinion to it.
1
