Killers need buffs not nerfs
Comments
-
So is it good to count matches with DCs in them or not? If they were counted the kill rates for killers would be even higher in the stats, as people usually either ragequit at the start (lowering the odds for the other survivors) or while being steamrolled and the killer is already winning decisively.
I totally agree that killer emblems in higher ranks are dumb though. If they want to pursue their ~2k balancing average they need to tweak them so it doesn't demand as much.
0 -
Almo and Peanits aren't the leadership tho :/
0 -
i didnt needed to click link to know from which streamer it is (most links from killer sided comments leads there) but he isnt even that good killer xd
btw since he claimed wraith is 3rd or 4th best killer because he learned how to play him xd (im half wraith/half pig main since year ago and always have good results)
maybe every killer is good if you pay some attencion to him and learn how to play him??
pig is rly strong killer if you know what youre doing (hes rly bad on pig and his build is also very bad) if you want to see good pig player look at scorpionz on twitch but there is a lot of ppl that will wont like him because hes not hiding behind ruin or not top killer mask
1 -
If playing 16 matches against red ranks and getting 4ks for 15 of them isn't good, then what is?
0 -
With 3 slowdown perks and the best addons... Wow... Very impressive...
0 -
I challenge you and anyone else to do better, since you all think he's bad. hahaha
0 -
The problem is map design,not killers being weak
0 -
Yeah playing as survivor is not even fun because you escape like 50% (ok probably less) of the time. Should be 5% of the time instead then it would really feel like you did something special. Now escaping is just..mm did it again meh..
Problem is people want games to be on easy these days.
0 -
Then why if they consistently do well do people concentrate on only the matches where they lose? If they are well over the average in terms of kills/escapes doesn't that say more than cherry picking some videos?
If someone consistently 3 or 4k's they are a good player but what seems to be the case is they feel like they should always get those results. They can state that's not the case but it doesnt ring true when they dont seem to understand that just because they are a good player that they will never meet some that are just better.
Take the wraith experiment with 49 wins out of 50 matches. Should we then use the same argument as some do with these loss videos he to say that Wraith is then too strong and needs nerfed because one player did well with them?
Post edited by twistedmonkey on0 -
I'd say the game is getting pretty balanced
It's been a long time since i lost and felt it had to do with balance
I think the problem is that people view of viable is skewed
They want killers that can easilly deal with the 4man swf death squad but those killers would be horribly overpowering against avarage survivors
0 -
That is true but regardless of what you're trying to say, people can't call someone bad at the game when they consistently kill every single person.
0
