The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Shining

About

Username
Shining
Joined
Visits
65
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
17
Badges
4
Posts
18

Comments

  • I believe most people would identify toxic behavior performing actions for the sole intention of being malicious towards the opposition or just other people in general. Actions that have no real bearing on progressing through the gameplay. For example using a flash light to save someone isn't necessarily toxic (that is one…
  • Survivors are also mostly the ones who instigate toxic behavior in the post game chat, their stream, leaving steam comments, etc.. no matter how the killer plays.
  • Here is the thing about "gen-rushing". Some SWFs will intentionally coordinate to split the gens between the four of them. The killer obviously can't be in 4, 3 or even 2 places at once so even by pressuring survivors off gens it can still swing in their favor if the chases don't end quick. Experienced survivors will…
  • You are overlooking a few things in your misguided example. Deviation: "a" vs "er" and Intention. If I beat somebody in a game and they call me the latter, their intention is malicious and to provoke thoughts of racism. If somebody approaches me with the former under non hostile circumstances then it might not be as much…
  • I agree with you on the basis that everyone should still have at least one chance to correct themselves. When people are given multiple chances is when it becomes a problem. In addition to the fact there is no telling if the report is looked at and even if action were to be taken, it could be a month or more before they…
  • The off yourself comment is definitely in the top 3 remarks that get thrown out there. One could argue that allowing behavior to continue that is only malicious and harmful in nature with minimal or no consequences is "letting them win". Yeah, maybe it doesn't bother you, but that isn't really going to stop them from…
  • I think you are misreading. The suggestion here isn't to implement a temp ban for doing it, because that is already in place. This suggestion is that the use of racist remarks should go straight to Strike 3 / 1 Week. Thus only giving the Offender just one chance to straighten up post suspension rather than be given…
Default Avatar