-
Re: Survivors need to improve and get better
Absolutely nothing is better than something that A) is a relatively small sample size that relies heavily on the honesty of the user and B) Has been shown to be widely inaccurate. Like I said, it…2 -
Re: Survivors need to improve and get better
So you have no numbers, then, outside of a third-party app that varies, sometimes wildly, in accuracy. There are four people on the Survivor side, each worth 25%. In no single match can a Killer achi…4 -
Re: Survivors need to improve and get better
It's not an interpretation. It's basic mathematics applied to observable reality. You balance around the average match because it would be asinine and counterproductive to balance around le…1 -
Re: Survivors need to improve and get better
Nightlight is a weather vane at best, it gives a vague sense of which way the wind is blowing. It's useful, but it's not for arguing exact numbers, especially not fractions of a percent. Wh…5 -
Re: Survivors need to improve and get better
53% is still lower than the intended 60%. 60% kill rate = 2k on average. This tells me you don't understand what fair or balanced means, at least in this context.7
