Huntress change
Before I get into this I just want to say that I understand Huntress doesn't NEED this change, it's just an idea I had that I wanted to share.
One con to playing Huntress I've heard people bring up is the fact that she often (keyword often, not always) has to break/give up chase to go get hatchets from a locker which aren't always conveniently close. So I asked myself "What's another way huntress could get hatchets?" This is what I came up with.
If the huntress successfully downs a survivor with 2 hatchets, when she goes to pick them up, she gets those hatchets back. If she only hits 1 hatchet and then downs them with her axe, she gets just 1 hatchet back. If she hits a survivor with her axe and then downs them with a hatchet, she also only gets 1 hatchet back. Hatchets that miss and hit an obstacle, she can't get back. So she will still have to go to lockers, just not quite as often.
Also they should change iridescent head so that it's only a 1 hit down if the survivor is a certain distance away.
Thoughts?
Comments
-
It would make huntress way stronger, so I assume people will complain more about her but I do like the irri head change.
0 -
Don't people say that about every suggested change to a killer though?
0 -
the reason why huntress is trash it's not because she has to reload, rather her speed (which cause her to be still affected by infinites) and her map dependance (cause big hitboxes like Ormond's boulders or indoor).
0 -
Free hatchets, I'll take them but people will complain.
0 -
Okay, I understand what you're saying. That doesn't mean this is a bad idea though, right? If it's not her issue it wouldn't make her too strong, right? Just a QOL change?
0 -
This is the DBD community we're talking about, where there's always complaining.
1 -
it's a meaningless change, it would be strong only with iri head (as it is now), otherwise it wouldn't be so strong, since it would incentive people to use hatchets and reward a good huntress.
0 -
Note how I said at the very beginning " I understand that Huntress doesn't NEED this change" I understand it could be meaningless, but that would also mean they could make this change and no bad come out of it, right?
0
