im shocked by this community
killer must kill as efficently as he can
survs must survive and repair gens as efficently as they can.
this is it, Why cant this community accept it?
first of all "camping". Okey, i explain you what this evil camping actually means it does not mean some evil unresistable strategy , it does not even mean staying near a hook without ever walking away from it , it means that absolutly lazy and insolent survivors dont want to see ANY protection of hooked surv whatsoever. They want to run for free without any strategy , risk and to unook.
this community whine about caping even when gates are open, 1 surv is on hook, 3 survs are alive. They litearlly dont want killer to protect the only logical and available objective remaning map, They are in 10-15 meters away from killer, and want him to accept an obvious bait of following a heatly surv to the gates where he can escape while others save their teammate.
Literally defensive part of the game is cut of by whining, you can put a surv between 3 remaning gens and controll all objectives on the map but NO you cant apply this obvious strategy because lazy survs cant get free ticket for unhooking.
Also now when out of two remaining survs one is on hook and gens at 0% progress you have to pretend that you dont understand where he is going to be. Amazing.
Comments
-
Camping is lazy and not an efficient tactic for killers.
There are times it is the correct move, for instance you get two hooked right next to each other. Or as you said 3 gens left and survivor hooked in the middle of them. But as an overall strategy, you will lose more games than you win against good survivors.
Ofcourse, against silly survivors that keep hook rushing while you are in proximity, well then the onus is on them.
Post edited by Clevite on8 -
Camping is lazy and not an efficient tactic for killers.
There are times it is the correct move, for instance you get to hooked right next to each other. Or as you said 3 gens left and survivor hooked in the middle of them. But as an overall strategy, you will lose more games than you win against good survivors.
Ofcourse, against silly survivors that keep hook rushing while you are in proximity, well then the onus is on them.
0 -
Camping is lazy and not an efficient tactic for killers.
There are times it is the correct move, for instance you get to hooked right next to each other. Or as you said 3 gens left and survivor hooked in the middle of them. But as an overall strategy, you will lose more games than you win against good survivors.
Ofcourse, against silly survivors that keep hook rushing while you are in proximity, well then the onus is on them.
0 -
ses
0 -
Defending camping in general shows you shoudlnt talk about issues you are hardcore biased with.
2 -
People complain about camping because its not very fun. One person queued for ages, might have had a minute or two in the game and thats it. They’re immobilised on the hook and dont get to play. Then know that as soon as they’re unhooked the killer is waiting nearby to knock them straight back down. There’s no counterplay you can do yourself other than bringing one specific perk in the game, which just buys you small headstart on the killer. Thats it, thats the only counter.
Its not about the strategy its about the fact that it sucks and just ruins the game for a lot of people.
5 -
Being opposed to camping in general shows you shouldn't talk about issues you are hardcore biased with.
1 -
LOL. PLS for gods sake: read and understand!
0 -
I did, I just applied your rhetoric in the opposite direction.
3 -
Which makes no sense if you really would have understood what i wrote.
1 -
Then tell us what the hell does it mean? It's just really empty and says "no don't defend thing I don't like".
2 -
I wont help guys that cant read one sentence, which meaning is just reading word by word.
0 -
Except the example he gave was about the EGC and having a basically guaranteed kill vs losing an easy chase and giving the survivor away.
1 -
So you admit it's just vague and meaningless, but you're pretending it's not?
2 -
If you bring ds, sprint burst, inner strength, you get quite a leg up on campy killers albeit without a mori in play. But then you are locked into running a build that fights the most effective strat killers have at winning the 1v1. I wish I didn't have to run these perks but most killers only care about the 1v1 so I'm stuck. I hate ds because they usually go with the mori stray so just leave the ds out of it unless you're one of those run at the killer nerds that ruined ds for everybody. Then by all means.
0 -
You’re arguing with one of the most survivor biased people in this forum. Don’t expect too much.
0 -
Thanks, I know I've been on the forum since 2018, I just don't post often.
0 -
Sure it make sense. What you wrote wasn't on the level of Hegel or Heidegger.
Your statement boils down to if someone has a bias towards something they shouldn't have a say in the conversation about that topic.
- The topic is camping.
- The individual is defending camping.
- Defending camping shows a bias.
- The individual shouldn't talk about camping, because they have a bias towards the subject.
That same line of reasoning could be applied in the opposite direction.
- The topic is camping
- The individual is opposed to camping.
- Being opposed to camping shows a bias.
- The individual shouldn't talk about camping, because they have a bias towards the subject.
Replace the topic with anything else, DS, Borrowed Time, etc... Would you be willing to say the same thing about DS?
"Defending DS in general shows you shoudln't talk about issues you are hardcore biased with."
0
