Simple Question - Yes or No - Do you think NOED is fine?
Comments
-
Yes
0 -
Negative.
1 -
yes
0 -
Yes - but I refuse to use it because it feels super scummy.
0 -
I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't notice a difference with the speed movement.
0 -
No.
Just give your answer and leave if u read this.
0 -
Yes.
0 -
No
0 -
Yes
0 -
Nope. Under no circumstances should a player be rewarded for failing his/her objective.
2 -
In power, yes. In usage and enjoyment, no. Too many bad killers use it as a crutch to down and camp survivors to death after getting destroyed in the rest of the game.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
Byeah
0 -
No.
1 -
Yes why are you now getting mad that you have to do totems when you had all game.
1 -
You hardly even get a haste term, though.
0 -
Absolutely, undoubtedly, undeniably, yes.
1 -
No.
1 -
that wasn't a simple yes or no
1 -
No.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
Indeed.
0 -
yes, depending on circumstances of course
0 -
Yes
0 -
I agree about the speed bonus. It's a yes for me without it. But an I don't know with the speed bonus.
0 -
Yes, it is absolutely fine, as it has lots of counters.
0 -
Yes and no, mostly leaning on no, there are times where a killer can get a 4k just with this perk but that's not that common, i just wish it didn't have that speed boost
1 -
Yesnt.
1 -
Yes
0 -
No, but many things aren't fine in DBD so it's just a grain of sand on the beach.
0 -
No
1 -
Nope.
1 -
No.
I think the speed boost should be removed and I think the perk should notify the survivor before someone is downed.
Additionally I think it needs a prerequisite is needed. Every survivor should be hooked once throughout the match before it activates.
1 -
Not at all.
1 -
Noed hurts mostly solo Q, doesn’t mean they’re bad survivors.
If you only get kills because you relied on noed, it does make a mediocre killer though.
1 -
In solo Q, no.
In swf, yes.
1 -
Yes
0 -
yup
0 -
Nope.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
No.
I love how split the responses have been so far.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
In concept? Yes.
In practice? Ehh... I'd say no. It could be completely fine with some very simple changes like a totem counter (like others have mentioned).
I also feel like if there were a Survivor totem that gave all Survivors an extra free health state or somehow hindered Killers as steeply as an insta-down does Survivors that the old chant of "Get gud, do bones" would be silenced.
2 -
Yes. And I know you said no reasoning necessary but the simple reason it's fine is because it can be countered before it even activates.
0 -
Nope 😀
1 -
Yes. Its fine, if it isnt then BHVR will mend it eventually.
0 -
Noed is okay.
0 -
Yes.
Killer played with 3 perks all game against 16. It's an issue for survivors because they refuse to just leave or finish the bones they walked past the whole game.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
Lots of mixed responses here.
I just want to add my two little grains of useless salt.
I do think NOED as a perk is bad for the overall game health, but with how it can easily be handled by one of several different perks on one survivor, I do think it's fine.
As long as there's a reasonable method of countering it (before it even spawns), it is fine. But no, I don't think it's good for game health.
0
