The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Who's in the right?

In a match I was spectating (after dying on the hook) the survivor who was camping hatch the entire time got lag-switched and died. He sat there not even attempting to save me. It was my first hook too. Hatch camping isn't fun for any party (thankfully its being removed).

I talked to the killer after the match and thanked them and they said that they never lagged switch, but as a survivor main hated selfish survivors. In the killers defense the only unhook that I saw the survivor do was right in front of him.

My question is: Is it ethically right to treat a toxic survivor toxically by denying their win even if it is based solely off of the fact that the killer lag switched.

Comments

  • ThePloopz
    ThePloopz Member Posts: 1,010
    What do you mean the killer didn’t lag switch  ;)
  • Techn0
    Techn0 Member Posts: 405
    edited June 2018

    He should of just slugged you and got the kill on the hatch camper normally, it would be totally possible if he knew where the hatch was. I'm still happy that the survivor that sat on the hatch died though.

  • weirdkid5
    weirdkid5 Member Posts: 2,144
    No matter how toxic someone plays, resorting to cheating is never the answer. He should just either slug him or facecamp him.

    Cheaters need to be banned. You can't follow the rules when you feel like it.
  • redjasper
    redjasper Member Posts: 143

    Unfortunately, the hatch mechanic during the PTB does not solve hatch camping. It's only meant to solve hatch stand-offs. A player is still going to be able to camp the hatch unless the killer decides they want to find the hatch first before one survivor remains. Nothing cringes me more than a hatch camper.

  • Runiver
    Runiver Member Posts: 2,095

    @trophytroll said:
    In a match I was spectating (after dying on the hook) the survivor who was camping hatch the entire time got lag-switched and died. He sat there not even attempting to save me. It was my first hook too. Hatch camping isn't fun for any party (thankfully its being removed).

    I talked to the killer after the match and thanked them and they said that they never lagged switch, but as a survivor main hated selfish survivors. In the killers defense the only unhook that I saw the survivor do was right in front of him.

    My question is: Is it ethically right to treat a toxic survivor toxically by denying their win even if it is based solely off of the fact that the killer lag switched.

    Playing selfish isn't forbidden.
    Lagswitching is forbidden.

    The answer is obvious.
    If you don't feel like helping your teammates, you don't have to.