http://dbd.game/killswitch
Opinions on Lore accuracy to Legendary skins
What are your opinions on lore accuracy to legendary skins?
I think it doesn't really matter unless it's a bit too absurd such as if they put a legendary skin that is the alien on the trickster.
It doesn't really make sense why Krampus has traps either but it kinda works.
Comments
-
Well most of those skins are quit okay when you consider that the entity is just a big elder god that can bend time and space to its will. As an example I have no problem with beach Dwight and christmas Dwight, both are Dwigth but the entity choose different times to take him into the fog.
Other skins like Bacchus Clown or Charon Blight are also quit fitting in my opinion. They are not "the blight" for me but another being with a similar ability. Charon rushing at you for not paying him the coins is also quit the fitting idea in my opinion and the Clown as a god of hedonism (yes, yes, he is more but still...) is very fitting.
There is however as you said a fine line that should not be crossed. Survivors as an example can be more goofy than Killers as they had a normal life. Maybe the entity took them while they had a party and where drunk. Killers not so much as most of them got taken by the entity for their malice. Beach Hillbilly is strang for that very reason however he is still unsettling enough to be a serious Killer.
The only exceptions to the rule would be Legion and Ghostface as both are quit "human" and could do some wonky oufits. Trickster can have some too as he could just have them as stage costumes.
1 -
The entity does whatever it wants. Lore who?
1 -
For the Blighted skins it's imo 100% canon, Blight captures other Killers to perform experiments on them. Tomes confirm he did this to Trapper and Doctor, so the rest make sense.
1 -
I'm not really talking about the blighted skins, I more talking about like If Mr,X was a skin for Nemesis.
0
