Last Standing FOV change is a bad idea. Here's why.
Comments
-
Fun fact:shadowborn used to give even more fov than current. Somewhere around 105-110.
So this is probably close to what last stand+shadowborn would be. If they even stack. If not then idk.
Post edited by supersonic853 on0 -
I don't think you even read what I wrote. You said "shadowborn is sickness waiting to happen". I replaced shadowborn with "base fov". That means base fov can still cause motion sickness (and does to a lot of players) and for that group of people shadowborn alleviates that from happening as bad.
0 -
At least half of all blights are forced to run three perks. They wouldn't want blight to be running four perks, come on now.
0 -
I'm just glad they removed his camera from his belt buckle and properly put it around where his face is.
0 -
I never used shadowborn on blight so...
0 -
With how much players comment about the lack of accessibility options when it comes to FOV in the game its funny, in a sad way, that they would be adding something that would be an accessibility issue. It's like how people constantly comment about photosensitivity accessibility and then in PTBs we see BHVR plans to add in things that hurt those with photosensitivity rather than help. FOV and accessibility isn't something new, I've seen people complain about it for years. BHVR really should work with a group that specializes in accessibility to go over their decisions in adding things to the game as well as fixing the things already in the game that cause accessibility issues.
2 -
No I don't want to get flashlight saved from the back of my head. Seriously Shadowborn allows some crazy flashlight angles it's why I don't run it personally.
0 -
Dbd fov is horribly bad for players health. Please stop saying there's a competitive advantage to Shadowborn. There isn't.
No one is gonna see your butt behind a tree because of it.
6 -
I'm glad I did not play grimlin blight
0 -
Did say half.
0
