Realistically, do we need 10 Macmillan maps?
Comments
-
correct.... still should just be 1 or 2...
0 -
me playin the dredge or the nightmare
0 -
oh yeah for sure, imo all maps should have a couple variants but only 1-2
given how many maps are one-sided, however, i would prefer they focus more on rebalancing the ones we have. good thing they're doing that for borgo at least
0 -
Actually that makes sense, but at the same time, they could do to make them more different areas of Spingwood or such, you know? It's still in the long run 5 versions of the exact same map disguised as 5 separate maps. So like I said, I really hope don't get Coal Tower I and Coal Tower II, etc. Especially with as I said, the Map Prevention going by actual map and not Realm, even with their supposed 50% lower chance or whatever of those kind of maps, we still get Badham Preschool right after Badham Preschool WAY TOO OFTEN.
Honestly, IMO that as a fix would be great. Swap the map prevention to be Realm based rather than Map based.
0 -
I'd rather we get a map blocker that locks out the previous 2 maps that each player in the lobby has play on. There is plenty of map variety, we just need a system that promotes them.
0 -
That has been implented.
at least, it's guaranteed for the next game. Its chances of appearing are then increased gradually over the course of 4 (?) games. Barring map offerings.
And also green wards, for some reason.
0 -
Honestly im not so sure that new varients of macmillan maps needed to be a thing with the already horrendous map design allowing for pallet into pallet into pallet or window into window.
0 -
Unfortunately it's map specific, not Real specific. Meaning you can easily get stuck in a Badham loop because the game doesn't care you've already been to Springwood, just that you've been to Badham 1-4 and it can give you 5.
Statistically very unlikely, but I'd like it if it stopped situations like this and actually made you play on varied Realms.
0
