Stat page accuracy test
Comments
-
ahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha, I'm sorry but that is the only reasonable response. When facts and data don't back up a hypothesis then the hypothesis is proven false unless new facts and data come around to support it.
You setup a hypothetical scenario with a single fight where it looks like the guy with the sword has an advantage, if it turns out that after a large series of fights that the guy with fists is actually winning, even against skilled opponents, then the hypothesis that the swords are giving these people an advantage is proven incorrect. In that, again hypothetical, situation this guy could teach others how to fight against swords like him and they would have similar results. Since this is hypothetical and not a real situation it doesn't matter how unrealistic that is. Stop glazing yourself and join the real world. Not responding again.
-2