http://dbd.game/killswitch
Stop dodging killer, you're pathetic
Comments
-
Dunno why you're telling me that. I'm just reiterating information I've read on the forum and speculating based on the same information.
0 -
Then DBD would be unplayable because no one likes being dodged, literally. Just like how no one likes DCs because it basically prevents you from having a balanced game.
Just imagine if survivors could see what killer you're playing as and you kept getting dodged until you played a killer that best suited their needs. It wouldn't be fun, wouldn't it?
I honestly don't mind being dodged by a killer because I understand how broken SWF can be. Like you say, no one likes DCs because it prevents people from having a balanced game. On the other hand, dodging SWF is an attempt to prevent having an unbalanced game. One breaks the balance. The other brings balance back to the game. Because I understand that difference, I'm able to empathize with my opponents. It saddens me that most people can't.
When you queue, both the killer and survivor should be prepared for anything. Dodging and DC basically says you wasn't ready to play DBD and need a break (exception: Sudden real life events)
Then one can also argue that "when you first load up the game, both the killer and survivor should be prepared for anything, which includes killer choosing not to play against SWFs. If you are bothered by that, it basically says you aren't ready to play DBD and need a break." If you can make up your own rule like, "if you queue..." everyone else can make up their own rules also.
2 -
######### are you even playing this game for honestly? Answer that for us, I've saw you ######### for well over a year now about this game and I've saw you stream quite a few times ,you really don't even play this game to high ranks on either side so you don't have a clue about what is going on anyway, you and the same people go into survivor threads and completely dumpster fire them if they have any legitimate concern or differing opinions about the game and make yourself out to be this DBD god that is never wrong , but yet when you make a thread and the topic even veers a little you "summon mods" to save you, ill bet you have three-four times the hours on this forum than you do the game
1 -
And this is why I often regret trying to help people and providing information I've read around the forum, because some people can't tell the difference between someone else relaying information and someone expressing an opinion, and then they get pissy at me for what someone else said.
1 -
No sir I actually appreciate it when you do relay useful information however you do the exact thing you accuse other people of doing to your threads , just like in the thread you were throwing @thesuicidefox name out there , I only get pissy when I see people being hypocrites or flat out over exaggerating things like how these killers try to pretend survivors are some unstoppable Force in this game when we both know they aren't
1 -
Honestly in the most non pissy or offensive way possible I want to know why you still play this game at all if you have this big of a problem
1 -
I honestly don't mind being dodged by a killer because I understand how broken SWF can be. Like you say, no one likes DCs because it prevents people from having a balanced game. On the other hand, dodging SWF is an attempt to prevent having an unbalanced game. One breaks the balance. The other brings balance back to the game. Because I understand that difference, I'm able to empathize with my opponents. It saddens me that most people can't.
Dodging doesn't just happen on SWF, it happens for any reason you can make up tbh. However, with that said, I understand how difficult SWF can be since communication breaks the fundamentals of DBD but regardless, you should try your best in these scenarios since being a quitter gives you a 0% chance of winning. I have more respect for survivors and killers who have perseverance, rather than just giving up at the sight of a challenge.
Then one can also argue that "when you first load up the game, both the killer and survivor should be prepared for anything, which includes killer choosing not to play against SWFs. If you are bothered by that, it basically says you aren't ready to play DBD and need a break." If you can make up your own rule like, "if you queue..." everyone else can make up their own rules also.
Specific Quote:
"Killer and survivor should be prepared for anything, which includes killer choosing not to play against SWFs."
Translation:
Killers don't have to be ready for a hard challenges but survivors have to be ready for hard challenges.
You're literally contradicting yourself when you said that. Survivors have to be ready for anything, but they can't be ready when the other side isn't ready.
1 -
However, with that said, I understand how difficult SWF can be since communication breaks the fundamentals of DBD but regardless, you should try your best in these scenarios since being a quitter gives you a 0% chance of winning. I have more respect for survivors and killers who have perseverance, rather than just giving up at the sight of a challenge.
Why should people try their best in an unfair scenerio that, as you say, breaks the fundamentals of the game? Even more importantly, why should people be forced to play such a game? Why can't people just be able to try their best in a fair game?
Specific Quote:
"Killer and survivor should be prepared for anything, which includes killer choosing not to play against SWFs."
Translation:
Killers don't have to be ready for a hard challenges but survivors have to be ready for hard challenges.
By equating the phrase, "killer choosing not to play against SWFs" with "killers don't have to be ready for a hard challenge" it seems as you are assuming couple of things:
1. SWFs are "challenge."
It's not a challenge; it's broken. As you yourself say, it breaks the fundamental of the game. For example, being forced to play a game of Scrabble against a person using a third party app like an anagram decoder isn't a challenge - its usage simply breaks the fundamentals of the game. A person refusing to play against a player using an anagram decoder shouldn't be condemned or criticized for just wanting a more fairly balanced game.
2. Game that contains only solo players cannot be a "challenge" for killers.
As someone who plays mostly solo, I believe that the game has finally come to a point where solos are pretty evenly matched against most killers. Now granted, I play on a console where Nurses are more difficult to play, but for the most part, solo players like me are in a good place - we win some, lose some. Same probably goes for killers. There are plenty of games where a number of good solo players attempting their best will be able to overcome the killer, and even moreso "challenge" the killer.
So perhaps the killer simply wants to play a challenging game against other solo players in a way that the game is meant to be played - a challenging game where it doesn't break its fundamentals. Why do you keep denouncing them for that?
1
