Forget I said anything about this experiment.
Comments
-
Leatherface may not be as bad as people claim but that still doesn't change the fact that his power sucks. It has so many downsides and needs serious buffs/rework. Even if you would win almost all of your games it would only prove that you are skilled killer and not that LF's power is usefull.
I really hope that some LF changes are coming soon. My poor Bubba deserves to be a true menace and not to be laughted at like he's now.
0 -
Then you're not the only wrong person, congrats.
Popularity =/= being right
0 -
Whoever agrees with what the results imply will believe you, whoever disagrees with what they imply won't.
Personally I'd like to see whatever spreadsheet you come up with anyway, I like numbers 😄
1 -
There is nothing to prove or demonstrate. Leatherface has base killer stats and a bad chainsaw compared to Billy's. He has no other power or abilities.
The only thing to learn from such an experiment is how good you are with killer fundamentals and how often survivors make mistakes.
Leatherface is bad because his design and his power are bad. There is no worst killer to rule them all. There is the low tier bench and Bubba is sitting firmly on it with a few others.
0 -
There is something to learn. How consistent LF can be at rank 1.
What perks work better?
Etc.
Also, don't rain on other people's parade
0 -
Rules that I gotta follow
0 -
Reminds me of the question: If a tree falls and noone is around to hear it...
But since you've been around for a while, I'm willing to take your word for it.
1 -
All we would learn is how consistent @GrootDude is at rank 1 on PS4. And even then, a hundred games with so many variations in survivors individual skill, SWF, perks, tools, add-ons, offerings, maps, totem placements, etc... Wouldn't mean much at the end of it, statisticly speaking.
I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade. I'm just voicing my honnest opinion. There is nothing wrong about playing and enjoying Leatherface. But trying to demonstrate any kind of special value to his kit is just wishfull thinking. If you can be consistent with Leatherface in red ranks then you can be consistent with most M1 killers and get similar to better performances overall.
All Leatherface has is a cumbersome insta-down attack. Thats it. Thats the entirety of his abilities. And its a shame. I wish he had a more interesting design, but right now its simply not the case.
0 -
NO
0 -
He really isn't a bad killer when he's got his best addons. If anything he becomes more deadly around common loops that almost no other killer can be. As for testing without proof: as another poster said, a spreadsheet would be good, but only with a grain of salt.
1 -
I don’t really find the whole “if you learn an m1 killer, you can play all of them” to be true for instance, I’m a trash doctor and only an ok clown.
0 -
While I would definitely prefer to see a video when it comes to experiments like these, a spreadsheet alone would be fine. I would love to follow such a thing.
1 -
I'll believe you...
but i'd much rather have videos
0 -
Once I get to rank one, I’ll start working on it and update it daily, I’ll post the updates and the complete version here. :)
0 -
I’d much rather make the videos tbh, but I’m glad the spreadsheet will work.
0 -
Dew it!!!! :D
1 -
I mean I'm not so petty as to call you a lier, but video's of sweet multi downs are so satisfying.
1 -
They really are 😂
1 -
I hate playing one side exclusively so in order to save my sanity, I’ll only do 50 matches.
0 -
You could just upload the vids and take the punishment...
Be a martyr for the cause!
As Rambo said "get grounded for something, or live for nothing"
0 -
Nope!😂
0 -
I might not reach rank 1.... Keep getting safety pips even when I win.
0 -
Make it a Google sheet so you can add as you go and we can see.
0 -
That’d work, if I manage to reach rank one. My play style (not camping) (maybe a little bit on camping depending on the scenario) hurts my emblems.
0 -
@Rizzo90 @Gay Myers (Luzi) @MandyTalk can one of y’all please close this? I’ve decided against the experiment.
0
