If we don't want campers and genrush why still on game?

We must also understand that making a game isn't all that easy.

Well i would like to point out the example of using a fictional setting for video game mechanics, might be rather poor. Since star wars has the force, Vader who medical suit looks like it heavy based on sengoku armor[ might be due to star wars being influenced by hidden fortress in more ways than]. What is most important about a fictional setting, is consistency. That and a setting can have different rules from our own reality. So science might be hard to fully apply to it. Since it often working on different rules. Like say berserk. We have trolls, elves, god hand, giant swords. In the case of Guts, since a young age he was always training with and using a sword that would be oversize for him. The dragonslayer sword he uses, was created due to some rich high born lord holding a contest, to create a blade that slay a dragon. So the blacksmith created one, that could slay a dragon. Only it turn out the blade was not very usable for a normal man and dragons don't exist. With it all coming together and making sense with in the context of that setting, as to why Guts can use the giant blade and why it was created. It has more context to it, than just giant blades are cool. IT all comes together to make perfect sense, with in context of that setting, even if using a giant sword in our own reality might not be the best idea. That and authors or creators tend to be gods of their world, so they have final say over how things work. As long as something is consistence and make sense in their setting, how it works in our real world doesn't matter at all or else we would never have fantasy races, supernatural elements or magic. Since gundam mecha should be a massive big target but due to minovsky particles, something that exist in gundam but not our own reality, it makes the mecha seem like a very good idea, due to things that only exist in that setting. Sure it might be impossible in our own or simply a bad idea, yet in the context of gundam, it's a good idea due to things that only work in that setting. Now if it lacking in consistency and the rules change all the time or simply make no sense, like in rwby or disney star wars. Fair game to point that out. Since that is a legit flaw in the writing. That or if it claims to be historical and get something wrong related to history. Than yeah fair game to point that out. Since well part of the point of being historical is to be historical, not create your own fantasy world.

While video games mechanics are massively different. Since it always effects the player, in some way shape or form, good or bad. It has a often clear real effect. That and failing to notice bugs or other issues, like balancing issues. Can have a clear effect on the player experience and can't be written off as it just being part of that setting's rules or the way things work there. Someone getting something wrong like a certain number, could make a skill way stronger or weaker than it should be. Since you can more easily prove, if a certain mechanic is working as it should or if a skill is to weak or powerful. Like oh yes this thing is very useful or this certain skill is worthless or simply anything else would be a better choice than picking x skill, due to other skills having better effects or bigger pay offs for their usage. Same can be said for mechanics working together, you can show off how poorly or well they work together. So if someone messes up the code and creates a bug, that can be prove to not be working as it should.

While in a fictional setting, something that is not a copy and paste of our own reality aka stuff they got wrong about our reality, well might be well part of the genre or someone playing with an idea. Like gurren lagann and spiral energy, that allows humans in that setting to do many things that would simply be impossible in our own reality, throwing galaxies due to pure will power. Yet makes sense and works, due to being consistence with in that setting, even if science in our reality would say that impossible. For the fun part is, it's not our reality but a totally different world from our own. So using our own science and applying it to that world, might not make alot sense due to the setting following massively different rules from our own reality. That and just due to not following our own reality. Doesn't mean it bad, in fact it could still be very good. Even if science screams at the top of it's lungs this is impossible for a fictional technology they might have no idea how it works, unless the piece of fiction goes into great detail about it. Since something being wrong in a video game, you can clearly point to it and say this is not working as how it should. While something not following our reality 100% in a fictional story, might just be the point and everything is working as it should, due to all the pieces fitting together nicely like a puzzle aka it being good writing.

Now onto the point of this thread. Well, slugging has a clear easy meaning. Put a person into the dying state and leave them. While camping, i seen people have massively different meanings about this. So if we had a clear meaning of it and a face camping buba and not going from gen to gen in your three gen plan. That would be helpful to this point. That and having a clear meaning of tunneling. Since is it tunneling if a survivor runs into the killer over and over again, jump scaring them or just the survivor playing badly? That and well, if these things are a legit plan someone can use effectively. Well the question is, when would this be a effective plan to use or in other words, when would it be ok to use and when would it not be ok to use?