Should I Feel Bad?

no

if you're gonna camp and tunnel as Spirit with 5 gens still up, shes trying to make the game not fun for yall

should i feel bad because i was being an #########?

survivor mains- no they camped

camping is a strategy not a good one but still viable.Just because someone does this does not mean they hate you or want to be mean by the looks of it it sounded like it was working(aka she was getting hits on you guys coming for the unhook),But whatever you survivors gotta tell yourself that toxic behavior is justified.

You did nothing wrong by beating her and all escaping. She got punished for camping by getting zero kills.

You ran her for 3 gens. I would say that she wasn't a very good killer or spirit at the very least.

Demolishing her was enough.

I always take the high ground so Tbagging and clicking at the exit gates was in my opinion a crappy thing to do.

Look at it like this,

She used a perk as intended.

You used an item to intentionally grief the killer. As well as using the crouch mechanic in such a way as to intentionally grief the killer.

I will ask you, who is more wrong and intentionally violating code of conduct behavior?

(Not judging you, i have learned to ignore it, just answering your question as honestly as possible)

Just like killers justify toxicity like leaving survivors to bleed out or other toxic behaviour by claming they had a bad game so there taking out there frustration on the next survivors. I've seen that excuse used by killers multiple of times and no one said anything against it. Majority of facecampers dont do it as a "valid strategy" unless there a rank 20. Most do it to ruin others fun

Camping and letting survivors bleed out is reasonable in your situations but when you bring insidous and facecamp at 5 gens, you do it to ruin the survivors fun not to 4k. which is why i feel like what the op did is justified

No you shouldn't feel bad. I would have t-bagged and flashlight clicked as well and made her either hit me out or I would have waited the time down to the last second before leaving.

It's a taunt and the entire purpose is to annoy the other side. It's then up to each individual whether or not it bothers them with some people getting extra annoyed for some reason. I'd say most online PvP games has some way to taunt and DBD is no different. People "shouldn't" get upset over it and people shouldn't be given the finger wag of disapproval for taunting.

Granted I'm more of a time and place kind of taunter. I only taunt at killers that play rather scummy in order to gain their attention as people that play scummy are normally the most effected. Sometimes they'll even throw the entire game because you t-bagged once by going on a forever chase and then camping. Frankly that's a win in my book.

People that taunt at every pallet just look silly and are generally just wasting their time. Unless you're a really good looper you're only helping the killer and in the case of said person being a good looper one simply has to abandon and move on. The taunt is there to keep your attention so don't play into it's hands.

I would agree IRL but not so much when it comes to video games. The entire point of a taunt is to taunt which players should be allowed to do IMO. It can even give you some strategy when used properly.

It's no different in any other game with t-bagging or voice clips and heck, even single player games AI can taunt you with voice clips and such. I just don't see it as a bad thing to have or use in video games and while it may technically be "rude" it's such a minimal amount of rude it's silly. Like not holding a door open for someone levels of rude. It's inconsequential and unlike IRL it's all in fun.