DBD pulled a Paladins with Legendary Skins

Honestly I love BHVR, but just don't support those skins.

When they notice the difference in sales, I think they'll realize that players just aren't into them.

Ok, I'll explain this in two ways for each of the possible things you mean.

First, legendary skins are the linked skins that change the character, their body structure, and animation such as Lisa Garland, and the Minotaur.

Second are linked skins, they give the character new outfit, but it can only be worn in full.

Legendary skins are linked for what I feel are obvious reasons, for example, not having a man's head on a woman's body, or vice versa. These may also be for licensing reasons of being able to add more characters from previous chapters, ex stranger things Robin, Johnathan, hopper, Joyce, L4D Zoey, Francis, Xenomorph as Demogorgon or even a fix for Quentin.

The linked skins are what people normally have a problem with, being the cosmetics for characters that aren't legendary, but are stuck together anyways, such as the newest Nea, Jeff, Clown, Jane and silent hill characters outfits, and the reason behind those are so they can make cosmetics that they otherwise wouldn't be able to make, for example, Neas hood on the graffiti outfit, or Jane's full body dress. My solution to the issue of everyone hating those being linked is to only link what needs to be linked and let the last part go, so Nea's pants, or Jane's head, or heck Moonrise and Bunny Feng's head and legs respectively. A reason for these may also be because of licenses wanting to keep their characters looking a specific way, and not wanting their likeness being mixed with their several outfits.

On a side note, I wish they made a goddess outfit for Kate, and made a Medusa hag for the Greek set. Wouldn't that have been sick?

Well, imma go waste money on goddess Feng, c'yall later

Because there are cosmetics that shouldn't be combined. Look at the oni it wouldn't make any sense to combine anything because it's a whole skin a character it's not just clothing like on the other skins its a new person dude. The answer isn't "MoNeY" dude the whole dead by daylight community is too stupid to count 1 and 1 together.

i can stand the oni but i do think they shouldn't make these cosmetics to offend.

I don't think that linked sets should be a thing. If it's not a legendary basically if it doesn't change the models and the animation it shouldn't be linked together

I'm fine with legendaries because of the model and animation change simply because I feel like it would make your character look incredibly stupid to have different body parts with different proportions that don't match each other

I'm happy with most of the sets so far (Even if the rare cheryl ones being linked is... ugh.) but I do have a concern that it'll be flooded with a lot of skins that have very miniscule reason to be sets (Such as the new Jane one. I love it but you didn't have to lift up the leg portion by like 8% and then call it a linked skin lol.)

I'd rather they try and make most cosmetics unlinked with the occasional linked ones for designs that just wouldn't be possible otherwise, rather than its current state where there's miniscule differences that make a skin linked (Such as giving Clown like, 1 extra chin. C'mon now.)

That doesn't change the fact it's new and therefore a relevant topic of discussion. Holy ######### man, I'm not trying to say BHVR just cured cancer with a brilliantly minute and complex series of medical assessment and experimentation, I'm saying they created a new way for stuff to be worn. Hello????

I have no idea why you decided to copy and paste what I wrote, you already quoted me, are you just trying to make your post look longer??

It doesn't matter because it's still a violation of the Eula, exploiting a bug to access something you couldn't previously, that something being, mixing and matching pieces of character models that are not meant to be separated. End of discussion. Why? Because the Eula is non-negotiable.

Anti-consumerism my ass, people are angry because you can't stick a rabbit head onto a leather jacket and be "quirky, weird, and fun" and because they can't the refuse to give a chance to a feature that's been out for less than 2 months.

and I'm not even saying "be excited for it" I'm ######### saying give it a chance to see what the devs decide to do with it, to not tear it down before they have the chance to do something cool with it you stubborn, arrogant, blockhead. That is an extremely low-bar to clear and an entirely reasonable request. You guys decided you didn't like it before it even came out in the first place.

The 15$ price tag for legendary skins is gross, but the 10$ price tag for premium cosmetics is something that everybody seemed to accept as soon as the store went live 2 years ago and there's no fighting that now.

"Nancy's head on HOPPER'S body???"

Say that to the countless fanfictions.

I mean it's a free to play and I don't think their devs works for charity.

Funny how you can easily be found guilty of the exact same thing. I've never claimed it was good now I've always on this thread said it has the potential to be good, but we can't very well see where it goes if people get all huffy puffy over just the mere idea with very few proper examples to actually cite for reference until only just recently, and even then there still aren't that many within the game.

You haven't deconstructed anything, you've only ever said rhetoric like "no ground to stand on" and "I deconstructed yours" but that doesn't actually make it true.

I've already re-clarified my point that all I am looking for from people is them to provide BHVR the chance to provide us with something cool, which is something you have failed to address time and time again instead contorting our points to a "you like them and I don't". I brought up the fact that streamers and other players blatantly violated the terms of service and you flat out said you didn't care. You even dropped your argument about how the linked cosmetics aren't "new" features because they unmistakably are.

On top of that you've repeatedly thrown Red Herrings and completely unrelated comments around in your posts to buffer how many words are actually in them, such as calling out BHVR's slow development cycle and tweaks about perks, what does that have to do with cosmetics in the shop?? Or how you've aggrandized the entire argument into a problem of "corporate greed" and "anti-consumerism" just to distract from having to build your own argument, which isn't even your own argument your central focus this entire time has merely been to poke holes in what I'm saying and in general trying to tear me and my opinion down. Newsflash: that's not an argument.

In truth, you've proven absolutely nothing and in fact you gave up on one of the first arguments that responded to me with because it was something you couldn't prove. Repeating rhetoric that boils down to "you don't have an argument but I have created a strong one" and actually believing that makes you a strong argument or case is completely asinine.

I wholeheartedly agree.