WHY??
Why should SURVS always have to say how killers should play? (no camp, no tunnel, no NOED ... etc) they are always right? mmm
Comments
-
Ignore them. You might as well ask a gazelle what it thinks of the lion.
9 -
Do you losten to them? cause i dont
0 -
We should tell to the survs how to play them (no claudete prestige 3 ... no DS ... etc)
2 -
That's the great thing about being a 50/50 killer/survivor player - I feel completely justified in ignoring everyone.
8 -
Weird, I play both and there will be times where a Doctor tunnels me and my conscious thinks ", Come on man, I am a Doctor main too." Of course, that is immediately followed by the incredibly obvious realization that they're doing nothing wrong and just actually being a killer.Eight said:That's the great thing about being a 50/50 killer/survivor player - I feel completely justified in ignoring everyone.
2 -
@Peasant said:
Weird, I play both and there will be times where a Doctor tunnels me and my conscious thinks ", Come on man, I am a Doctor main too." Of course, that is immediately followed by the incredibly obvious realization that they're doing nothing wrong and just actually being a killer.I feel the same way. Playing both sides gives one some much-needed perspective.
1 -
@Peasant said:
there will be times where a Doctor tunnels me and my conscious thinks ", Come on man, I am a Doctor main too."Ahaha. Never seen anyone else say that, but I get the same thoughts when facing Amanda. "I'm a Pig too, #########. Cut me a little slack here."
Should be able to unlock a cosmetic on killers' bloodwebs which lets a survivor show their allegiance/respect. Like at P3 L50 Piggy, you get a robe to wear on your Meggy.
2 -
That's a great idea! Please post this on the wishlist!Eight said:@Peasant said:
there will be times where a Doctor tunnels me and my conscious thinks ", Come on man, I am a Doctor main too."Ahaha. Never seen anyone else say that, but I get the same thoughts when facing Amanda. "I'm a Pig too, #########. Cut me a little slack here."
Should be able to unlock a cosmetic on killers' bloodwebs which lets a survivor show their allegiance/respect. Like at P3 L50 Piggy, you get a robe to wear on your Meggy.
1 -
I used to rage d/c against tunnlers. I would get double pissy at Myers doing it with an entitled mentality about me playing him too.
Screw that, a killer wiil kill. Survivors are surviving and if they fail tehir job the killer did theirs.
Cut ties with my SWF becuase of how toxic and full of themselves they became2 -
I play how ever the hell I want. I don't camp because it's skilless tatict. Though after someone is unhooked I go back and the first/close person I see i attack and if it's the one who just got off the hook is closer well guess they're going back on the hook... well I'm sorry but the point of the game is to kill survivors not show mercy. Plus is that really tunnelling anyways? If ask me it's bad luck for them. If they want think I "tunnelled" then sure they can think whatever the hell they want. Plus I'll use Noed if I want. If you're going to use self care I'll use NOED. Stop crying.0
-
@laKUKA said:
Why should SURVS always have to say how killers should play? (no camp, no tunnel, no NOED ... etc) they are always right? mmmwell we dont its just that when you find me first and tunnel me till death hook i am either able to juke you to where i run out the exit gate or i lose you or you catch me, i die and i get barely no bp and i de-pip
0 -
Same. I play to win. I have little sympathy for any of the survivors unless their team completely DCed. My goal every match is to have fun by making survivors regret taking their ultra rare items and quick swapping tto their toxic Claudette. (Which earns them a one way ticket to being the first to die.)
TheLegendDyl4n1 said:
That is my main goal playing killer, except I want to do that to all 4 of you.i die and i get barely no bp and i de-pip
0 -
Killers need pips too! We get those pips by being ######### Survivors. Just like how survivors get there's by being ######### to killers by refusing to just die!TheLegendDyl4n1 said:@laKUKA said:
Why should SURVS always have to say how killers should play? (no camp, no tunnel, no NOED ... etc) they are always right? mmmwell we dont its just that when you find me first and tunnel me till death hook i am either able to juke you to where i run out the exit gate or i lose you or you catch me, i die and i get barely no bp and i de-pip
0 -
Its sympathy to kill a wounded animal. The best thing to do when their teammates DC is to kill them asap so they can get on a good teamthekiller490490 said:Same. I play to win. I have little sympathy for any of the survivors unless their team completely DCed.0 -
If they request to just go to the next game I grant them that ability. If I'm feeling evil I get them on a gen and get more points for grabbing them.sixty4half said:
Its sympathy to kill a wounded animal. The best thing to do when their teammates DC is to kill them asap so they can get on a good teamthekiller490490 said:Same. I play to win. I have little sympathy for any of the survivors unless their team completely DCed.0 -
I have only just started playing more survivor after being only a Killer-main for months, and I will almost always defend the killers actions, even when we lose. Just realise the difference between obnoxious facecamping at 5 gens, and the smartest plays they could make.
It baffles me that people could complain about a killer being bad, when they scored a 4k, like whatever strategy is clearly working.
0 -
yesterday, i was accused of camping the whole game, because the last 3 gens were close together, and i wouldn´t leave them to chase one.
0 -
@sulaiman said:
yesterday, i was accused of camping the whole game, because the last 3 gens were close together, and i wouldn´t leave them to chase one.Wait. Three generators were close together? Congratulations! You now have the 1 scenario where Surveillance can actually do something!
0 -
@laKUKA said:
Why should SURVS always have to say how killers should play? (no camp, no tunnel, no NOED ... etc) they are always right? mmmJust ignore them, they are just salty that they lost.
As long as you kill them, you did well
1 -
@Orion said:
Ignore them. You might as well ask a gazelle what it thinks of the lion.well admittedly we're talking about gazelles that can shove the lion around, body block it, throw pallets onto it, blind it with flashlights, and loop it forever, and there's four of them at once, also they stab the lion. Really the gazelles collectively hurt the lion more than it hurts them.
0 -
@Peasant said:
@sulaiman said:
yesterday, i was accused of camping the whole game, because the last 3 gens were close together, and i wouldn´t leave them to chase one.Wait. Three generators were close together? Congratulations! You now have the 1 scenario where Surveillance can actually do something!
it still sucks
0 -
@FEARTHEGHUS said:
@Peasant said:
@sulaiman said:
yesterday, i was accused of camping the whole game, because the last 3 gens were close together, and i wouldn´t leave them to chase one.Wait. Three generators were close together? Congratulations! You now have the 1 scenario where Surveillance can actually do something!
it still sucks
Never said it was good, all I said was that you now had the best chance of using it.
0 -
@laKUKA said:
We should tell to the survs how to play them (no claudete prestige 3 ... no DS ... etc)Why would Claudette prestige 3 matter?
1 -
I have to imagine almost off this "survivors telling you how to play" is almost strictly on PC. Its the post and pre-game chat on PC that makes this awful. We suffer nearly none of this on PS4. I see nothing of good coming from having chats in this game. If anything, you should have a single option at the end of the game to tell specific players "Good game" or not, and give that person an extra 100 BP. This would remove some toxicity and encourage people to just let things go.
0
