Why can't we SMACK EGC'ed survivors?
It is so ridiculous, why are they transparent in the situation?!?
I wanna keep smacking them til the last moment... daaaaaamn
Comments
-
What situation? I'm confused.
0 -
Why didn't you smacked them earlier?
@Rivyn he's talking about the death animation when the end game collapse timer is out.
1 -
The entity doesn't like it when the killer touches their food when he is already eating.
15 -
Why would you want that tho? Just to bm?
11 -
that's a valid answer Rep+
because some nasty survs didn't have enough beaten up
3 -
They just got impaled, had their spine broken and a spike rammed into their brainstem, how nasty did they get?
0 -
lul nasty AF to still need to be beaten up while impaled
0 -
useless toxic feature, no need for it
7 -
That's the Entity's kill, don't mess with it!
1 -
Because it's considered toxic behavior and the devs have already stated they want to remove the ability to do that to hooked people as well since it's not respectful.
Now whether that idea has CHANGED is an unknown thing to me.
1 -
Edit: also “HittingOnHook” 😂😂😂 just made me burst into tears laughing.
0 -
Devs can't remove Kebabing (beating on hook) since the Japanese community would protest so energically that DBD would need to close
0 -
Because hitting them and not injuring them serves ZERO purpose other than a salty killer feeling empowered by a situation they're already winning in.
The ONLY exception is the one hit on hook to stop the screaming. Everything else is just a killer letting out their issues because they finally have an upper hand.
1 -
nope, when survs dribbling around try to unhook a surv and you fail the hit smacking the hooked surv then u spend valuable seconds in the weapon cleaning animation, and was a success of the survs that unhooked the hooked surv
0 -
This is one of the most masochistic threads I've seen.
0 -
0 -
The entity doesn’t want his/her food chopped up for her, they are not a little boy/girl anymore!
1 -
that answer is also valid for me
Rep+
0 -
She*
0
