I want the thong in claudette's new skin!

The only thing I can see being different is that bhvr didn’t whitewash Claudette as the artist did...

No, friend. The first part is a reply to you. The second, the thread in general. Typically how that works, friend

Bruh, Imma need citation on that "she had it coming because she was wearing this" statement. I never heard that in a context that wasn't making fun of the idea that men are so stupid they think that's an argument you can use in court, at least in a modern context.

As far as harrasment goes, yes some people harass women sexually and that is a consequence of being attractive, but that harrasment isn't isolated to the sexual. You could be wealthy or famous and be harrased, it has more to do with the nature of having something others want or covet.

That alone shows that sexuality, and the ability to tap into sexuality as a tool in society, is powerful and invaluable, and amongst many talents and abilities that most woman may posses, just like physical strength is a symptom of Male physiology, inevitably tying the idea of physical size, shape, and power to male nature, the ability to attract, facilitate, and nurture are in the same way tied to female nature. Are all females sexual? No, and neither are all males physically strong, but those ARE the exceptions to nature rather than the rule, and they don't speak any less of those who fall into the natural trend, or vice versa

There is absolutely nothing wrong with saying that sexuality is inextricably tied to womanhood. It would be wrong to say specifically, that woman are to be sexualized at every opportunity and that they deserve to be harrased, but I'm not looking at the negative connotations of feminine sexuality like you are. I could easily say the same thing about men, that because they are considered to naturally be physically stronger that it's the reason they have harder physical and mental work loads placed on them, that they are the driving force cattle of society and that men aren't treated fairly in cases of ######### allegations, and these contribute to the higher suicide rates in men.

But then what does that say? That I think men as a general rule SHOULDN'T bare a certain load of responsibility because they are in general physically stronger? And in turn, should I look at all women as sexless human beings who should only be approached for mutual business arrangements?

Sorry, but that's not how nature works. Nature isn't concerned with gender politics, it is concern-less.

I could explain the history of that too you, but I'll say this, if you were wearing that style of clothes, it wasn't just some innocent reflection of how cool you are (at least not initially).

In other words, if you wear a thing like that, it's a statement just like the baggie pants were a statement.

While I do think alot of what you said is true women are typically believed when it comes to harassment I've never heard of that before and typically women are believed. Link me one article that says otherwise.

If anything its men who are ignored when this harrassment by a women. They are victims too right? But most of the time it doesnt matter they ignore men.

Yeah me neither although it did show an interesting aspect we've never seen before. But I would want it on a different survivor Now I'm mostly scared for Legions.

Personally, I could see it more on Nea than Claudette.

I agree that false accusations are disgusting, and only make it harder for real accusations.

I also agree that lack of awareness for and attention toward men being sexually harassed/objectified by women also unacceptable.