devs proved once again they don't ever listen to feedback with Trickster

They seem convinced that skill will overcome artificial innaccuracy.

You have no idea what quality teams of Survivors I went up against, so I would remind you of the old saying about assumptions. Either way, I've gone on the record as to my experiences with the Killer. We will see him in general play with EVERYONE soon enough and it will take about a month to truly know where he stands. We can look back on this thread and compare notes at that time.

You’re forgetting that no such game existed beforehand. They had no template, or previous successful attempts at asymmetrical multiplayer slasher horror to use as reference.

They were having to learn as they went along. You can’t expect people to magically know how things are going to work perfectly when no one else has ever done it before to provide guidance.

Bro Yes...we now exactly the type of teams you faced. Stop trying to act like you're the only one who's good with him. Because you saying this would have to mean that. No one else is doing well with him. At all. Bit you're the man, right? Lol

Wow relax mr president, we're just having a conversation. This is the standard bhvr problem that they admit they hate. If they release something powerful, the community will call this game pay to win, if they release something underpowered, people like you come in play. It's a lose-lose situation, so they prioritize visuals and fun over power. The trickster is designed as a fun killer, nothing more. They don't want every killer to be S tier, and admittedly they succeeded on making him fun and interesting. I tried him once and he did feel really really fun.

Does he needs some tweaks? Maybe, I'm unsure actually because I haven't seen him past ptb. Who knows maybe there's a way to play him that we haven't figured out. But crying because bhvr didn't listen to some angry redditors on how to develop their game reflects a bit on who you are as a person. The devs don't need to listen to 3 year olds and make the exact change they want so they won't cry or ######### on the floor. They listen to feedback and decide if what the community suggest is possible to add without breaking the game by any means, or without destroying the vision they had of the killer. Let me give you an example.

If the devs listened to angry reddit users like you, who complain more here than playing the game, the trickster would simply be deleted. Remember the chaos after the reveal of the trickster? People complaining about his visuals and saying he should be deleted. Do you remember the ds change announcement, where angry 3 year olds wanted their money back since they bought laurie to get an op perk and bully the killer, now that it changes they want their money back. Do you remember the ruin changes perhaps? Where everyone complained about ruin being balanced and that the game won't survive without old ruin? Don't feel personally insulted that they didn't change something that you suggested, because they don't need to do anything that you tell them to do. If I was a dev and I saw this thread, I'd feel insulted because one guy wants me and my team to do whatever they want.

Lastly, I don't care about how many hours you spent on the game. You could be here from beta, and you'd still be wrong. Intelligence isn't measured with hours spent on a videogame, you see

I had to write a whole paragraph to explain this exact sentence.

With a few words: Orion is correct

So what you're suggesting is that the devs need to fufil your and everyone's requests to keep a good reputation? You're correct, the game is built upon feedback and the playerbase is what defines the future of dbd. I've been in similar debates more than once, where people are annoyed of a change or, similar to you, complain that the devs simply don't listen. That's not the case pal, I could give some examples, like the undying nerf, freddy rework, the spirit nerf, the legion rework, that prove that the devs listen to feedback. The reason you're personally mad is because, just like many people of the community, you feel ignored because YOUR idea wasn't added, so I really wonder why did you think it would be added in the first place? The devs can't fulfil all the request made by every simple player, the game would turn chaotic. I'm indeed shielding the devs because remember, they're still people. You expect them to add whatever your heart desires, but that's simply not the case.

Also, how do you separate good from bad feedback? The feedback you gave was your personal opinion. There's not "good" feedback and "bad" feedback. Every inch of feedback you give to the devs is your personal opinion and they will use it however they want.

I'm not saying you can't judge, you can do whatever you want pal, freedom of speech is a thing....at most countries.... I'm saying that people like you don't see the problem the devs face. If they release a killer like spirit, the community will say that the game is pay to win. If they release a weak killer, then people like you come into play. They're stuck in and endless loop because of toxic people of the community so, since they have to keep their reputation as you said, they prefer releasing weak but fun killers.

Also, do you want the devs to NOT be able to do whatever they want? What's this, a dictatorship all of a sudden? Yeah they're human, do of course I think they can do whatever the ######### they want. Because you think that they didn't listen to your clearly professional opinion/feedback, you believe that they don't listen to everyone? I will repeat the points that I gave to you on my last comment because you don't seem to get it: the devs will change whatever they think it's necessary to change after reviewing the feedback they got. If you remember correctly, Freddy on the ptb was fine, but when he got released too op. So after they listened to FEEDBACK they changed him, and they're going to change him again, they admitted that. Same with the legion rework, it was the worst killer to face, and they reworked him and the deep wound status effect as well. So what I see rn is a person who think they don't listen to their clearly superior intelligence and feels like everything they say is the correct thing, so the devs shouldn't have the freedom to choose to do whatever they want and they need to be a slave to them. I'd suggest waiting till the killer is released and playing him a bit more to figure out if he's worth a nerf or a buff. Since the ptb isn't the best place to collect feedback, that's why they're going for the smaller changes.

Also his "nerf" was one change on one of his add-ons, which is justified really.