Is Pyramid Head's ability to negate Borrow Time and Decisive Strike fair?

CornHub
CornHub Member Posts: 1,864
in Polls

Now that the dust has finally settled and he's been out for awhile, do you think his ability to negate Borrowed Time and Decisive Strike is fair?

Is Pyramid Head's ability to negate Borrow Time and Decisive Strike fair? 45 votes

Yes, it is fair
71%
Science_GuyGibberishAdelooBlueberryTapeKnotDimekdezzmontRaptorrotasJawsIsTheNextKiller[Deleted User]musstang62ElikMrPenguinSillierHorizon5GeneralVGlamourousLeviathanLordRegalDawnMadOBXThicc_Boi_Myers 32 votes
No, it isn't fair
22%
albarty123KoukdwBwstedGannTMbowoswager21mochabam97PSPNathan13Kodzi 10 votes
It's only fair for Borrow Time
2%
DemoFrog 1 vote
It's only fair for Decisive Strike
2%
Fobbo 1 vote
Other
2%
Fog_King 1 vote

Comments

  • Fog_King
    Fog_King Member Posts: 688
    Other

    I have mixed feelings about it. On one side, it's annoying to bring perks that the killer can just ignore, not only BT and DS, but We're Gonna Live Foverer too. On the other side, it's part of the killers power and makes the survivors be more careful, so they don't get tormented and sent to a cage.

  • DawnMad
    DawnMad Member Posts: 1,030
    Yes, it is fair

    It is fair mostly. Him getting a notification when someone is rescued is just bs. Also perks like WGLF should work on those.

  • dezzmont
    dezzmont Member Posts: 481
    edited March 2021
    Yes, it is fair

    It is completely fair, because Pyramid Head completely gives up the ability to snowball on hooks if he does this and guarentees that you will be insta-unrescued.

    The entire point of these perks is to prevent killers snowballing on you, by definition PH is not tunneling you if you get hit after being rescued half way across the map from him. Especially because if he IS in the area the cage will teleport out so if he comes in to interrupt your rescue you can just leave and wait a few seconds to get a better opportunity.

  • MadLordJack
    MadLordJack Member Posts: 8,814
    Yes, it is fair

    You get teleported as far away from him as possible, and his basic counterplay makes tormenting impossible in the first place.

  • TheFireVVolf
    TheFireVVolf Member Posts: 57
    edited March 2021
    Yes, it is fair

    It is fair IMO. It forces survivor to make better decisions as to when to save and how to save, and encourages interesting plays. Good survivors will figure out what to do, bad survivors will come to the forums and complain that PH is OP.

  • Science_Guy
    Science_Guy Member Posts: 2,019
    Yes, it is fair

    It's fair enough. The Survivor who wants to use DS or be saved with BT has to make a choice of crossing the trail and losing those perks, or avoiding it and going where the Killer wants them to go. But unlike the Plague's ability to negate major game mechanics or perks, PHead's negation is far from unavoidable.

  • GlamourousLeviathan
    GlamourousLeviathan Member Posts: 1,021
    Yes, it is fair

    Negating hook perks also works on the survivor side on PH's case. With his cage, he can't use PGTW, Dying Light, Make Your Choice, Devour Hope, Huntress Lullaby and so on...