so sick of hypocrite survivors
When a usable unintended feature is discovered on survivor side:
tHis iS a tEcH nOt aN eXpLoIt
When a usable unintended feature is discovered on killer side:
tHiS iS aN eXpLoIt rEmOvE iT dEvS, tHiS iS dIfFeReNt
Guess exploiting things like stretched res or disappearing collision, etc etc is fine, but when a killer can pull off something like J-flick (which requires a lot of practice and skill btw) it is unacceptable and god forbid certain killers have something like this.
Comments
-
They're all expoilts. If it wasnt intended or only certain players can do it due to system editing then it's an exploit. If you use them you're trash so your opinion mean nothing simple as. BOTH sides shouldn't be allowed to use such things.
12 -
Bold of you to assume this isn't exactly what killer players are also doing.
It's not just survivors, it's not just killers; both sides have hypocrites.
Exploits are exploits and exploits must be fixed, but don't make it an "us vs them" argument. We don't need more of them. Please.
30 -
I'm ghost face.
0 -
I doubt common sense is appreciated here.
16 -
I can always dream
10 -
How dare you be reasonable
11 -
I'm sorry please forgive my sins 😫😫😓
10 -
Not necessarily agreeing with op but i have seen a lot of defended techs in the past just it seems like its mostly on the survivor side (idk why). For instance the windowtech,The unhook tech (where you could crawl under the hook) and obviously theres still people that defend stretched. (But their are a few killers that use it to) idk if it just is because you see survivors using them more since its a 4v1 game? I personally thought the windowtech was interesting maybe just me though.
1 -
I think it's a lot of things: the sheer volume of survivor players relative to killer players; the fact that a 'tech' possible to one survivor is possible to all of them but only one of the killers; and (linking to the pooint before) there are more survivor content creators than killer ones raising more awareness to survivor ones.
That doesn't change the fact, though, that an exploit is still an exploit, now matter how many people defend it or how many people use it, and exploits should be fixed, irregardless of which side it's for.
7 -
Both sides have hypocrisy. These posts intended to divide the community are silly and really only go to show your bias.
Post edited by Clevite on20 -
It's not that they're both unintended, it's that the j-flick requires a separate program in order to work. As everyone here said, both sides are hypocritical.
2 -
So sick of hypocrites that only see the toxic behaviors of one side..
6 -
Killers say the exact same thing.
2 -
yeah, it's a crime here to have some brain. BAN
5 -
Both sides do it. I'd rather both sides acknowledge it in a bad way and try to get it fixed instead of crying to each other about it.
2 -
I mean both sides like to abuse exploits. The Blight J Flick exploit is something that isn't even remotely fun to go against, and not gonna lie I cringe a lot when a survivor main calls something like the pointing at a killer when they vault to abuse invisibility frames a "tech".
3 -
I've noticed that too. Worst part is a lot of the big influences tend to jump on board with this hypocrisy as well.
0 -
I just had my first match against a jflick Blight. Its cheating, simple as that.
There was no downside to his Power using this. Imaging having unlimited Sprintburst because there is a exhausting bug. That was the Level of missusing i expierienced, no skill needed.
1 -
My favorite type of survivor are the ones that dc for whatever reason and they act like theyre the victim.
0 -
Exactly. Any viewpoint that doesn't see hypcorisy on both sides might be suffering from confirmation bias.
4 -
All sorts of people do that though, and from the recent threads on j-flick and exploits in general it seems quite common that people want all of the stuff fixed. It's just that some of it is pretty hard to fix without fixing very basic elements of the game, like how to truly fix stretched res you'd have to fix how the game handles wacky non-standard aspect ratios to begin with. Because hopefully it's pretty obvious that lazier approaches like trying to restrict people's resolutions wouldn't fly.
And you see similar things with other weird arguements too. Like how sometimes people discount nerfs by saying they're "fixes" to make it "how it should've been to begin with" as if that somehow eliminates the fact that it wasn't like that to begin with. Even though I can see where people are coming from with it - it's very easy to fall for that trap when you have the gift of hindsight.
1 -
Thank you for being rational and reasonable.
3 -
I will forgive you if you post a cute cow video.
1 -
I'm not being harassed with more hamburgers, this is the best I can do
2 -
I'm sorry, I didn't know people were doing that to you. Baby donkeys are acceptable too!
1 -
I like to think of it as my only positive personality trait 💅
1 -
I don't mean to be annoying or anything but based on your previous post about not liking hamburgers and the pictures of cows, are you by chance vegan?
1 -
I'm not, I just recognise than when small and fluffy animals are incredibly cute, and as such I wish to hug thirteen of them at the same time. I think they're adorable and I post them to try to make people's day better.
Unfortunately some people don't understand the concept of positivity and think "hmm yes I shall be very original and just spam hamburgers or the same line of 'looks so good... In my stomach'" all the time and over the course of a couple of days of me trying to make people happy it really, really got to me. Because some people don't seem to get that they don't have to be an ass on every single post to make up for the lack of attention they got in real life (this is not directed towards anyone in particular).
So yeah, I stopped the cows, I just wanted to make people happier but nah
2
