Who is the Worse Killer?

Trickster.

If you play Legion against normal survivors that heal against Frenzy, you have to be really bad or be on an awful map in order to lose against them, Legion can slow the game down pretty well, so much that it doesn't matter Frenzy can't down someone.

If they don't heal against Frenzy, know how to loop and have a Shift and a W key you can't win or you at least have a very, very hard game and probably won't 4k, but that's like 1 out of 50 games at red ranks.

Legion may be "oh he poked me" but Trickster is "oh, he managed to throw 7 blades at me after 5 minutes". There is a good reason almost nobody plays Trickster.

EDIT: And with this comment I don't want to say Legion is good, they are both bad.

Trickster. I hate playing him and won't level him beyond lv40 for his teachables.

Trapper mains have to waste a good amount of time placing traps that sometimes never even catch people, but I don't main him so maybe this doesn't take as long as I think? Every time I face him chases don't start until around one or two gens pop, and even then most people can hold chase through another one or two gens.

Trapper and console Blight.

I'm actually surprised I'm the only one to say Clown. Trapper is inherently luck-based, but you can help make your own luck with good trap placement. The mere threat of traps can also help shut down strong loops. Like, as a survivor, let's say you're healthy and a Trapper is chasing you through shack. Are you going to vault that window? I dunno about you, but I'm absolutely not going to. I'd rather take a hit and run out the door than vault into one of the most no-brainer trap locations in the game and risk being downed and dropped in the basement. The threat of traps can also passively slow people down when traversing the map, and it can force mistakes from people in the chase because they're spending so much time looking at their feet that they don't spend enough time planning their route to the next tile.

Clown is great in the 1v1, and I honestly don't think he's a bad killer. I just think he's more one-dimensional than other killers. We're just lucky enough to be playing DBD in a day and age where even the worst killers are still viable.

Blight.

I hate that guy.

The early game can be significantly helped by CI. You can't just hold W through a section of the map that has already been trapped, and since CI forces survivors to come towards where the killer spawns (or to do secondary objectives while they set up) even the first survivor chased will be at risk of getting trapped. The second a survivor can't verify a section of map is free of traps, survivor behavior will change, as in my example about not wanting to vault shack window against a Trapper.

Once a Trapper is set up, predropping pallets and holding W are both pretty well countered by bear traps. It's also not a good strategy against a trap-based killer because holding W away just increases the amount of distinct areas of the map you're going to cover during the chase. The odds of stepping in a bear trap are going to be higher if you're immediately running somewhere else rather than staying in a loop you've confirmed is safe for as long as you reasonably can. Predropping pallets and holding W makes more sense against killers that are very deadly in the chase but that have poor mobility, like Deathslinger. Trapper is loopable until he places a trap, so it's not a great strategy against him.

That aside, though, his snowball is one of the best in the game. A single basement hook can easily win a game, even when the Trapper is behind. Other lower tier killers like Clown or Legion can't do that. He can be effective even on maps where traps are relatively easy to see with intelligent trap placement. For example, on maps with no grass like The Game and Hawkins, you could trap the drops from the upper floors or place traps right around corners so that survivors don't have a chance to react to them.

Why just under pallets? Put them at any choke point, loop, or high traffic area, then drive survivors into them. Traps are extremely difficult to see while sprinting when place in grass. You can't see the other side of vaults, down drops, or around corners either. They're really not hard to hide, or at least to put in locations that may be visible, but that deny key areas. Survivors can't do anything about a trap while in a chase, so seeing one only really helps if there's an alternate route available to you that won't end in a quick hit.

If a survivor somehow has a lot of distance on you, you're at the edge of the map, and they're moving towards an untrapped area in the center of the map, just drop chase. No low-mobility killer, including every other killer in this poll, can quickly deal with that.

I was trying to juke him and then when I unhooked my brother he was carrying someone named selena and then he trapped himself and I also saved another person.

It might just be because I'm a terrible Clown, but I think Clown is the worst Killer in the game. Like, sure he's got anti loop but that anti loop comes at a cost of your map pressure because of reloading and it isn't that strong. He's kinda like Deathslinger lite. In theory their 1v1 power makes up for their less than average map pressure. For Deathslinger it works because the Redeemer is REALLY dangerous. Like... almost ridiculously so. However it is my opinion that in practice, Clown's bottles are simply not scary enough to make him decent. I'd even rate Demo's Shred as more dangerous than Clown's bottles.

The other "weakest" killers on the other hand I can see reasons to pick them over anyone else.

Myers? If you want to be the stealthiest stealth to ever stealth... Myers is your killer. On certain maps, being permanently undetectable is a massive boon and you can absolutely tear Survivor teams apart without ever leaving EW 1. Granted... then next game you get Shelter Woods or Rotten Fields and are super sad. Having a 0m or 16m Terror Radius doesn't help if nearly every sightline is 30m+. But somewhere like Lery's where the average sight line is like... 5m or even less? Myers demolishes on maps like that.

Trapper? He has the most snowbally power in the game bar none. Yes even more snowbally than Oni. Did 2 Survivors step in traps and you can react to both? The Survivors are now in a very very bad position. On the flip side... he's also got the most inconsistent power in the entire game. Do you wanna roll those dice? Sometimes I do. Also the sound of a Survivor stepping in a trap is one of the most satisfying sounds in this game. I just wish he could carry 2 traps without an add on... but... having a required brown add on isn't that bad.

Legion? If you want a game where you win by slowly grinding the Survivors into a fine paste, Legion is your killer. He has the most consistent and reliable source of game slowdown in the entire game with his Frenzy deep wounds and easy injuries. Granted, he's got no follow up to that present in his base kit... but... that's what perks are for.

Trickster? Do you love M1 gameplay but absolutely hate it when the Survivors force you to hold W after them for what seems to be forever? Well then maybe Trickster is right for you. 24m base TR gives them less time to run early, even less if you load up with M&A. Short loops that are impossible to mind game are no longer just holding W until the pallet falls because you can chuck knives over the top. Survivors will be less inclined to hold W in a straight line away from you once you start sending a flurry of knives after them. Injuring with knives loses you way less distance than injuring with an M1 so you have to hold W for much less time.

Seriously... Clown is the one Killer where I just... don't see why anybody would want to play him.

Console blight is a lot better now but he has never been bad even when getting hits with the rush was tricky it was still possible and the map mobility is unmatched

Idk, I think we've just had very different experiences playing as and against Trapper. You're talking about hypothetical ideal survivors that basically don't exist in the real world, and if that's the assumption we should also be able to assume a hypothetical ideal Trapper that is able to anticipate survivor movements and place intelligent traps to catch those survivors. It doesn't make sense to assume the survivors are playing flawlessly and the killer is so weak at placing traps that it's a straight up waste of time to put them down.

If survivors are always ignoring choke points and never running through grass, they're losing lots of distance for free and not using strong tiles while chasing, even to predrop a pallet. It doesn't matter where you're looking while you vault; you cannot see a trap placed right under a window while sprinting up it before you commit to the vault. You either need to never vault or you need to risk landing in a trap when you do vault. So, Trapper does have ways of either gaining distance more quickly or getting some traps even against a survivor that's committed to hold W across the map.

I also don't know how a "hold W" strategy is any more effective against Trapper than most of the other killers on this list. Would you rather play as a killer like Legion that can be calmly looped and then you can just chain to the next tile? If you're running across the map eventually you have to reach an edge. That's not so relevant for loops; hypothetical ideal survivors can just run a base M1 killer until the gens are done, because you're not going to run out of pallets and strong windows to chain together before the gens pop.

Trapper is (obviously) a trap-based killer, which means he thrives on setting up traps in a key area of the map (yes, there are key areas - usually around your three-gen / key central gens, sometimes around the basement if convenient because of his ability to snowball by defending a basement hook, and also usually in strong tiles so you can turn them from time wasters to time savers) and then defending that section of the map. If you have like 20-25m of distance on him, you're running across the map away from his traps, and he follows you, that's a misplay on his part. It's really no different than a Hag trying to chase someone across the map away from her traps.

You seem to be taking for granted that a Trapper has no way of forcing survivors into traps, and that his traps are always going to be avoidable to the point of being a waste of time to place. That's simply not the case in practice. A Trapper can easily force you into a trap while chasing just based on where they run, even if you're not attempting to loop him; you might see them running diagonally right to try to force you left, and you might realize what's he's trying to do, but your options at that point are losing distance by running right and risking an M1 and gaining distance by running left but risking a trap. In that situation, most people will risk a possible trap over the likely quick M1, which a good Trapper can take advantage of.

If you're unpredictable with your trap placement, which you should be, people should not be able to anticipate your trap locations. The second you prove you can be unpredictable with your traps, it's like Huntress hitting a long range hatchet. Survivors now need to respect your power, because it's no longer as simple as looking down whenever you're approaching a pallet to see if there's a trap there. This can, and often does, cause survivors to make mistakes and give up distance for free in chase because they're worried about running into a trap.