We need an exit gate timer.

Vesperiavi said:

But why not just go in the exit gate and put pressure so they do leave? I get you shouldn't have to but the alternative is worse it seems. 

Because the people like that make you go right to the gates and hit them before leaving and if you don't they run back out and noise spam you

If both exit gates are open and one is left in the game I agree as they are holding it hostage or looking for the hatch so I would say 5 mins is more than enough time maybe even less.

Otherwise it wont work as there are too many factors, is one person being chased? is one person on the hook? if one gate is opened is the killer near it? is NOED in play? do they have Rancor? each scenario means you are staying to help someone if they go down or you have a chance to still get someone. There are many more to take into account.

@redsopine01 said:
Because the people like that make you go right to the gates and hit them before leaving and if you don't they run back out and noise spam you

Then hit them, if you goto the gate and you dont well that is on you, the reasons they stay are either to waste time for the others, waiting to make sure they all get out, being toxic of course and tbagging or giving then a free hit for extra points as it was a fun game.

twistedmonkey said:

If both exit gates are open and one is left in the game I agree as they are holding it hostage or looking for the hatch so I would say 5 mins is more than enough time maybe even less.

Otherwise it wont work as there are too many factors, is one person being chased? is one person on the hook? if one gate is opened is the killer near it? is NOED in play? do they have Rancor? each scenario means you are staying to help someone if they go down or you have a chance to still get someone. There are many more to take into account.

@redsopine01 said:
Because the people like that make you go right to the gates and hit them before leaving and if you don't they run back out and noise spam you

Then hit them, if you goto the gate and you dont well that is on you, the reasons they stay are either to waste time for the others, waiting to make sure they all get out, being toxic of course and tbagging or giving then a free hit for extra points as it was a fun game.

Because I don't hit I chase them and then turn when I see them go to hit hot other gate and suddenly I get noise and see there still there refusing to leave 

@Fibijean said:
I get that BM is definitely a problem, but who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a survivor to leave a match under those circumstances, rather than hitting them and forcing them out the gate? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

Survivors don't need to wait in the door area, they can simply hide in any location on any map.

As for the idea, I don't like it. Sometimes we stay in the game so that we can help our teammates who are on the hook or carry RBT timer. While staying in the game for no reason is a problem, timer is not a solution. I don't know what we can do though.

@Fibijean said:

@Orion said:

@Fibijean said:
I get that BM is definitely a problem, but who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a survivor to leave a match under those circumstances, rather than hitting them and forcing them out the gate? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

Who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a Killer to force you out under those circumstances, rather than leaving? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

It works both ways, you know.

For goodness' sake, everything doesn't have to be a survivors vs. killers debate. Don't you get that by making everything about an "us vs. them" mentality, you're becoming part of the problem?

The answer to your question would be a troll who has nothing better to do. But of course it works both ways. Obviously the survivor was doing the wrong thing. I acknowledged that. The point was that there's no reason to wait around that long except pride, and you're only wasting your own time there. Cutting off your nose to spite your face, as it were.

Survivors behaving badly is a valid complaint, but implying that they are holding the game hostage by teabagging at the exit is not. It's annoying, but at the end of the day it's in the killer's power to solve and says more about them (the survivors) than anything else.

Dude, you're the one who's turning Survivor trolls into a "blame the Killer" situation, and I'm to blame because I point out the source of the problem?

@Fibijean said:

@Orion said:

@Fibijean said:

@Orion said:

@Fibijean said:
I get that BM is definitely a problem, but who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a survivor to leave a match under those circumstances, rather than hitting them and forcing them out the gate? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

Who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a Killer to force you out under those circumstances, rather than leaving? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

It works both ways, you know.

For goodness' sake, everything doesn't have to be a survivors vs. killers debate. Don't you get that by making everything about an "us vs. them" mentality, you're becoming part of the problem?

The answer to your question would be a troll who has nothing better to do. But of course it works both ways. Obviously the survivor was doing the wrong thing. I acknowledged that. The point was that there's no reason to wait around that long except pride, and you're only wasting your own time there. Cutting off your nose to spite your face, as it were.

Survivors behaving badly is a valid complaint, but implying that they are holding the game hostage by teabagging at the exit is not. It's annoying, but at the end of the day it's in the killer's power to solve and says more about them (the survivors) than anything else.

Dude, you're the one who's turning Survivor trolls into a "blame the Killer" situation, and I'm to blame because I point out the source of the problem?

You're to blame for being so on edge that you assume someone is "blaming the killer" when actually they're doing nothing of the sort, yes. There is no problem to point out, except the dangers of jumping to conclusions.

You literally used the sentence "Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.". I'm not assuming anything; those are literally your words.

@Orion said:

@Fibijean said:

@Orion said:

@Fibijean said:

@Orion said:

@Fibijean said:
I get that BM is definitely a problem, but who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a survivor to leave a match under those circumstances, rather than hitting them and forcing them out the gate? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

Who in their right mind would wait FORTY FIVE MINUTES for a Killer to force you out under those circumstances, rather than leaving? Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.

It works both ways, you know.

For goodness' sake, everything doesn't have to be a survivors vs. killers debate. Don't you get that by making everything about an "us vs. them" mentality, you're becoming part of the problem?

The answer to your question would be a troll who has nothing better to do. But of course it works both ways. Obviously the survivor was doing the wrong thing. I acknowledged that. The point was that there's no reason to wait around that long except pride, and you're only wasting your own time there. Cutting off your nose to spite your face, as it were.

Survivors behaving badly is a valid complaint, but implying that they are holding the game hostage by teabagging at the exit is not. It's annoying, but at the end of the day it's in the killer's power to solve and says more about them (the survivors) than anything else.

Dude, you're the one who's turning Survivor trolls into a "blame the Killer" situation, and I'm to blame because I point out the source of the problem?

You're to blame for being so on edge that you assume someone is "blaming the killer" when actually they're doing nothing of the sort, yes. There is no problem to point out, except the dangers of jumping to conclusions.

You literally used the sentence "Honestly at that point, it's your own fault.". I'm not assuming anything; those are literally your words.

Fair enough. At the point where someone would rather wait 45 minutes in a game than give in to another player's rudeness and end things, assuming the OP was talking about teabagging at the exit gate and not actually holding games hostage, yes that is a matter of pride and nothing else and is the killer's fault. Not because they're the killer, just because of their personal failings. In short, I do blame the killer for wasting their own time.

I am not, however, excusing or in any way blaming the killer for the survivor's bad behaviour, which is what you seemed to be implying. That's what I was reacting to. If you weren't suggesting that, then I apologise.

@redsopine01 said:

Because the second you hook somone they run right out because all they want is to have you chase them

Then dont follow and stay at the hook, what is the issue with that? a lot of killer will stay near the hook to secure that kill, once they die you can chase the others out, that solves your issue there, the fact is the game still is not over until the one on the hook dies and /or the others leave, even if they do leave that person on the hook can still hang and struggle, what you are describing really is a non issue.

redsopine01 said:

Vesperiavi said:

But why not just go in the exit gate and put pressure so they do leave? I get you shouldn't have to but the alternative is worse it seems. 

Because the people like that make you go right to the gates and hit them before leaving and if you don't they run back out and noise spam you

Again, then just do it? I really can't comprehend the problem. I play both survivour and killer and am never bothered by this. They deserve to gloat if they have succeeded. I just, just hit them? 

Sonzaishinai said:

Some survivors don't even do it to gloat
But to give the killer some extra bloodpoints

Oh! You're right! Even then it's all in good fun. 

Master said:

@Vesperiavi said:
But why not just go in the exit gate and put pressure so they do leave? I get you shouldn't have to but the alternative is worse it seems. 

And what if they are hiding in some dark spot of the map? Do I have to check every dark spot manually whether I get a collision where I shouldnt?

For starters, I was talking about the exit gate. But if they just do that, why not just wait? Like do something else and just leave the match running? They can't be still for long unless they want the birds to rat them out. At some point one of you will give in, it's just up to you to decide who does. They aren't forcing you to stay in the game, you can leave or they can. You have to weigh the options yourself. I'm not condoning the behaviour, just simply stating.