We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

Lobby dodging and deranking on purpose.

There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.

Opinions?
«1

Comments

  • AntiJelly
    AntiJelly Member Posts: 1,155

    Devs can't do anything like that until dedicated servers. I believe as soon as that comes out we'll be seeing harsher punishments, but it's just a theory.

  • Cardgrey
    Cardgrey Member Posts: 1,454

    I only jump if someone has less then a green connection

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @Broosmeister said:
    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.

    Opinions?

    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that? I know it sucks for you because it increases queue times, but try to look at it from the other side.

    Ive suggested a queue penalty for DC so many times now......

  • Broosmeister
    Broosmeister Member Posts: 281
    Master said:

    @Broosmeister said:
    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.

    Opinions?

    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that? I know it sucks for you because it increases queue times, but try to look at it from the other side.

    Ive suggested a queue penalty for DC so many times now......

    I often play killer ( rank 2 atm ) and i almost never dodge swf. Swf can be extremely overpowered. But i face out of every 10 games maybe one Ochido wannabe pallet looping swf squad. Life goes on, even when you lose once. And if you lose everytime, maybe take a look at yourself instead of the game, killers are such whiny little bitches.

    Most of the time you get low ranks mixed with high ranks and way too altuiristic people. It's most of the time not that difficult. People just whine because of bad games they've had, i too had games with 4 DS and i had to camp to get just 1 kill and still i don't fear swf. Miss me with that weak #########.
  • Rebel_Raven
    Rebel_Raven Member Posts: 1,775
    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

  • Broosmeister
    Broosmeister Member Posts: 281
    edited January 2019
    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

    Yes, i play with friends most of the time. I have multiple people lower than rank 10. We play the game respectfully, no one uses DS and we don't T bag killers. We don't exploit and will only be toxic to toxic killers who camp or have 100% tunnel vision.

    Most of my games vs swf i win, and i win quickly. Most of the swf are having fun and are playing with me when they see that they have a little chance to win.

    People who are scared of swf only share their worst experiences. Other people get scared too because of some whiny dude who got blinded with a flashlight once. And now PS4 is just a lobby dodging wasteland.
  • lasombra1979
    lasombra1979 Member Posts: 1,142

    I play on PS4, rarely have an issue with lobby dodging, and yes, sometimes I do play SWF. As a killer, I have on occasion dodged a lobby, mainly when I recognize someone I know is a much higher rank than I am in my lobby. I have no issues with SWF honestly, but I have an issue when rank 1-4 groups with rank 10-20 just to bully killers.

  • Rebel_Raven
    Rebel_Raven Member Posts: 1,775
    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

    Yes, i play with friends most of the time. I have multiple people lower than rank 10. We play the game respectfully, no one uses DS and we don't T bag killers. We don't exploit and will only be toxic to toxic killers who camp or have 100% tunnel vision.

    Most of my games vs swf i win, and i win quickly. Most of the swf are having fun and are playing with me when they see that they have a little chance to win.

    People who are scared of swf only share their worst experiences. Other people get scared too because of some whiny dude who got blindes with a flashlight once. And now PS4 is just a lobby dodging wasteland.
    Honestly, i just keep running into mixed rank SWFs that have no business vsing me. Full colors above me.
    99 out of 100 are the worst sorts of experiences. 
    Mixed rank, toxic, utterly ruthless. Generally just being zero fun as opponents.

    Like I said, blame the overwhelming amount of SWFs that ruined it for everyone.
    If most SWF groups were like the way you describe yours, they might not get dodged as much.
    I'm just not fond of gambling on SWFs, and a lot of people feel the same way.

    It's easy for red ranks to talk a big game, but they aren't in the shoes of the low ranks usually getting stomped. 
  • scerckan
    scerckan Member Posts: 149
    of course they can implement a time out penalty but they're scared to lose players
  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823
    Master said:

    @Broosmeister said:
    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.

    Opinions?

    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that?

    @Master
    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.
    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.
  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823

    I also play Rocket League
    Are you good at rocket league? I need people who know what rotation means instead of chasing the ball the whole time.
  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Broosmeister said:

    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.
    

    Opinions?

    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that?

    @Master
    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.
    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.

    And?`Yes there are killers that are actually not skilled enough for rank 1 and still get ranked up because of the rank system. Then they get bullied by those SWF and I totally understand when they dont want to play such games. The only solution is to derank regularly because the rank system is busted and no casual mode is available.

    The situation might be differnt on console but I believe that if you play one of the unviable killers, its up to the survivors how the game ends and thats simply not a desirable situation

  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Broosmeister said:

    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.
    

    Opinions?

    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that?

    @Master
    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.
    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.

    And?`Yes there are killers that are actually not skilled enough for rank 1 and still get ranked up because of the rank system. Then they get bullied by those SWF and I totally understand when they dont want to play such games. The only solution is to derank regularly because the rank system is busted and no casual mode is available.

    The situation might be differnt on console but I believe that if you play one of the unviable killers, its up to the survivors how the game ends and thats simply not a desirable situation

    @Master
    Some killers take more skill, but there are no unviable killers.
    Some people might not be skilled enough when they reach rank 1, but deranking instead of trying to stay at rank 1 and get better is not the solution. It requires patience and dedication.
    I've played on both pc and console btw.
  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:

    Master said:

    @Broosmeister said:
    
    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.
    

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.

    Opinions?
    
    
    
    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that?
    
    
    
    @Master 
    

    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.

    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.

    And?`Yes there are killers that are actually not skilled enough for rank 1 and still get ranked up because of the rank system. Then they get bullied by those SWF and I totally understand when they dont want to play such games. The only solution is to derank regularly because the rank system is busted and no casual mode is available.

    The situation might be differnt on console but I believe that if you play one of the unviable killers, its up to the survivors how the game ends and thats simply not a desirable situation

    @Master
    Some killers take more skill, but there are no unviable killers.
    Some people might not be skilled enough when they reach rank 1, but deranking instead of trying to stay at rank 1 and get better is not the solution. It requires patience and dedication.
    I've played on both pc and console btw.

    Then why is nurse the only killer that can compete with a competent SWF?

    And I ask you a simple question. Why should a casual player force himself into frustrating matches to "git gud"? There are no rewards for rank, ZERO. Some players just want to have fun playing DBD :wink:
    You say it requires patience and dedication, maybe some players dont have enough time to play DBD like a full time streamer can do that and yet they are matched with SWF who can have up to several thousands of hours.

  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:

    Master said:

    @Broosmeister said:
    
    There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.
    

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.

    Opinions?
    
    
    
    If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that?
    
    
    
    @Master 
    

    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.

    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.

    And?`Yes there are killers that are actually not skilled enough for rank 1 and still get ranked up because of the rank system. Then they get bullied by those SWF and I totally understand when they dont want to play such games. The only solution is to derank regularly because the rank system is busted and no casual mode is available.

    The situation might be differnt on console but I believe that if you play one of the unviable killers, its up to the survivors how the game ends and thats simply not a desirable situation

    @Master
    Some killers take more skill, but there are no unviable killers.
    Some people might not be skilled enough when they reach rank 1, but deranking instead of trying to stay at rank 1 and get better is not the solution. It requires patience and dedication.
    I've played on both pc and console btw.

    Then why is nurse the only killer that can compete with a competent SWF?

    And I ask you a simple question. Why should a casual player force himself into frustrating matches to "git gud"? There are no rewards for rank, ZERO. Some players just want to have fun playing DBD :wink:
    You say it requires patience and dedication, maybe some players dont have enough time to play DBD like a full time streamer can do that and yet they are matched with SWF who can have up to several thousands of hours.

    @Master
    Nurse is definitely not the only killer who can compete against competent swf.
    If people don't want to put effort and dedication then fine, but they shouldn't say it's impossible to face swf. You want to be able to beat competent survivors? Just get better, but don't ask for buffs to make mediocre killers to able to beat good survivors.
    Game needs to be balanced around good players, INCLUDING KILLERS.
  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @Rebel_Raven said:
    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

    Yes blame the survivors like always while ignoring all the killers that play the exact same way or derank to 17 via dcing just to destroy newbs.

    If you'd quit making excuses and exaggerating so much you'd see that swf aren't that difficult to play against most of the time. You can use their own altruism against them without camping, you know when they'll go for an unhook.

    You'll have a good idea when they'll try to blind you, pallet slame you, blow a gen up to distract you, when they're going to work on certain gens etc.

    Did it ever occur to you that people in voice are just there to talk to their friends while playing the game, tell jokes, talk about work, gf etc? YOu somehow magically face depip squads or toxic squads at an impossibly high rate.

    In fact your rate of dealing with such squads is theoretically impossible to actually happen with such regularity. Your confirmation bias is making you believe what you repeat to yourself to such a degree that even if you were shown your account stats you wouldn't believe them.

    MIT did a study on this that was quite comprehensive where someone's confirmation bias would carry negative feelings from one game over to everyone that follow even if the other games were fine.

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095
    So let's punish people that don't want to play with or against red ping.
    Great idea!
  • ForeheadSurviors
    ForeheadSurviors Member Posts: 154
    Lobby dodge because of people using cheap internet .
  • inkedsoulz
    inkedsoulz Member Posts: 93

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:

    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    Master said:
    

    @Broosmeister said: There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.
    

    Opinions? If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that? @Master

    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.
    
    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.
    
    
    
    And?`Yes there are killers that are actually not skilled enough for rank 1 and still get ranked up because of the rank system. Then they get bullied by those SWF and I totally understand when they dont want to play such games. The only solution is to derank regularly because the rank system is busted and no casual mode is available.
    
    The situation might be differnt on console but I believe that if you play one of the unviable killers, its up to the survivors how the game ends and thats simply not a desirable situation
    
    
    
    @Master 
    

    Some killers take more skill, but there are no unviable killers.

    Some people might not be skilled enough when they reach rank 1, but deranking instead of trying to stay at rank 1 and get better is not the solution. It requires patience and dedication.

    I've played on both pc and console btw.

    Then why is nurse the only killer that can compete with a competent SWF?

    And I ask you a simple question. Why should a casual player force himself into frustrating matches to "git gud"? There are no rewards for rank, ZERO. Some players just want to have fun playing DBD :wink:

    You say it requires patience and dedication, maybe some players dont have enough time to play DBD like a full time streamer can do that and yet they are matched with SWF who can have up to several thousands of hours.

    @Master
    Nurse is definitely not the only killer who can compete against competent swf.
    If people don't want to put effort and dedication then fine, but they shouldn't say it's impossible to face swf. You want to be able to beat competent survivors? Just get better, but don't ask for buffs to make mediocre killers to able to beat good survivors.
    Game needs to be balanced around good players, INCLUDING KILLERS.

    Except when playing the Nurse, any other killer(even if the killer player is really good) will be destroyed when playing against 4 good survivors.
    Might get a few hooks and 1 kill, but not more than that.

  • Rebel_Raven
    Rebel_Raven Member Posts: 1,775
    powerbats said:

    @Rebel_Raven said:
    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

    Yes blame the survivors like always while ignoring all the killers that play the exact same way or derank to 17 via dcing just to destroy newbs.

    If you'd quit making excuses and exaggerating so much you'd see that swf aren't that difficult to play against most of the time. You can use their own altruism against them without camping, you know when they'll go for an unhook.

    You'll have a good idea when they'll try to blind you, pallet slame you, blow a gen up to distract you, when they're going to work on certain gens etc.

    Did it ever occur to you that people in voice are just there to talk to their friends while playing the game, tell jokes, talk about work, gf etc? YOu somehow magically face depip squads or toxic squads at an impossibly high rate.

    In fact your rate of dealing with such squads is theoretically impossible to actually happen with such regularity. Your confirmation bias is making you believe what you repeat to yourself to such a degree that even if you were shown your account stats you wouldn't believe them.

    MIT did a study on this that was quite comprehensive where someone's confirmation bias would carry negative feelings from one game over to everyone that follow even if the other games were fine.

    Never ignored killers depipping. 

    If you'd stop ignoring the fact that they're abusing match making to go ahead and stomp me before I'm ready.
    You seem to be mad that killers depip but have no problems with survivors playing against lower ranks than they should be.
    Enough with the hypocrisy, ok?

    Survivors get easier games but you're mad at me for wanting a reasonable difficulty?
    I should git gud while they use swf, and eachother, abuse match making, and especially comms as some of the biggest crutches possible?
    Just dripping with hypocrisy here.

    Screw using altruism against them. I don't want to play that way, and it's about all there is aside from getting genrushed. 
    I said they're no fun to play against.

    Yeah, sure, but you're ignoring the ones that use voice chat to get an edge that's basically cheating.

    Yeah, i do face squads like that because they're really common. They don't want to play, they want to win, and teabag me at the gate.
    I know you don't want to believe that, but yeah, it's my experience in DBD.  Accepti it, or don't . Either way, move on.
    I can't swing a dead Claudette without clubbing a dozen of them.
    Parties on ps4 with voice are really easy to make. They probably make SWF really easy. Might even have a join game option like most multiplayer games.

    Me repeating myself?? Coming from you? Lol

    Screw the study. 
    When you're making a deal, it doesn't matter if it's a good one, the person accepting it just has to feel that way.
    SwFs are often a raw one.

  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823

    Except when playing the Nurse, any other killer(even if the killer player is really good) will be destroyed when playing against 4 good survivors.
    Might get a few hooks and 1 kill, but not more than that.

    That might be in your experience, but not mine.
  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @Vietfox said:
    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:

    Master said:

    @Vietfox said:
    
    Master said:
    

    @Broosmeister said: There needs to be something done about lobby dodgers on ps4, it happens more than 50% of the time. Also people derank on purpose to get easy games and shorter waiting times.

    I also play Rocket League and when you leave a game, you get a time out from playing online for a couple of minutes. This should also be the case with derankers and lobby dodgers.
    

    Opinions? If the game isnt balanced around high ranks/SWF, why shouldnt they do that? @Master

    No matter how many times you repeat that, there are killers skilled enough to stay at rank 1 and be able to face SWF. Lobbydodgers will keep complaining because they are not facing the best teams, thus not getting better.
    
    I started a few days ago to run exclusively the nurse on console and i'm at rank 5 for now. Has it been tough? Yes, but i haven't dodged a single time because there's no way to improve by cherrypicking survivors.
    
    
    
    And?`Yes there are killers that are actually not skilled enough for rank 1 and still get ranked up because of the rank system. Then they get bullied by those SWF and I totally understand when they dont want to play such games. The only solution is to derank regularly because the rank system is busted and no casual mode is available.
    
    The situation might be differnt on console but I believe that if you play one of the unviable killers, its up to the survivors how the game ends and thats simply not a desirable situation
    
    
    
    @Master 
    

    Some killers take more skill, but there are no unviable killers.

    Some people might not be skilled enough when they reach rank 1, but deranking instead of trying to stay at rank 1 and get better is not the solution. It requires patience and dedication.

    I've played on both pc and console btw.

    Then why is nurse the only killer that can compete with a competent SWF?

    And I ask you a simple question. Why should a casual player force himself into frustrating matches to "git gud"? There are no rewards for rank, ZERO. Some players just want to have fun playing DBD :wink:

    You say it requires patience and dedication, maybe some players dont have enough time to play DBD like a full time streamer can do that and yet they are matched with SWF who can have up to several thousands of hours.

    @Master
    Nurse is definitely not the only killer who can compete against competent swf.
    If people don't want to put effort and dedication then fine, but they shouldn't say it's impossible to face swf. You want to be able to beat competent survivors? Just get better, but don't ask for buffs to make mediocre killers to able to beat good survivors.
    Game needs to be balanced around good players, INCLUDING KILLERS.

    THe official tournmanent was a pretty good showcase of the actual balance :wink:

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @powerbats said:

    @Rebel_Raven said:
    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

    Yes blame the survivors like always while ignoring all the killers that play the exact same way or derank to 17 via dcing just to destroy newbs.

    If you'd quit making excuses and exaggerating so much you'd see that swf aren't that difficult to play against most of the time. You can use their own altruism against them without camping, you know when they'll go for an unhook.

    You'll have a good idea when they'll try to blind you, pallet slame you, blow a gen up to distract you, when they're going to work on certain gens etc.

    Did it ever occur to you that people in voice are just there to talk to their friends while playing the game, tell jokes, talk about work, gf etc? YOu somehow magically face depip squads or toxic squads at an impossibly high rate.

    In fact your rate of dealing with such squads is theoretically impossible to actually happen with such regularity. Your confirmation bias is making you believe what you repeat to yourself to such a degree that even if you were shown your account stats you wouldn't believe them.

    MIT did a study on this that was quite comprehensive where someone's confirmation bias would carry negative feelings from one game over to everyone that follow even if the other games were fine.

    Even if I 4k a toxic SWF without them doing a single gen, I still dont enjoy the game. Survivors DC when they are tunneled and camped too, but for killers other rules hold, I know

  • Broosmeister
    Broosmeister Member Posts: 281
    Vietfox said:

    I also play Rocket League
    Are you good at rocket league? I need people who know what rotation means instead of chasing the ball the whole time.
    Highest i've been is diamond 3. I know how and when to rotate. Sometimes i play too patiently even lol
  • Poweas
    Poweas Member Posts: 5,873

    Ï constantly dodge lobbys as survivor. I will not get into a killers lobby where they have 200 or more ping. Hell naw. I will find another one. Until dedicated servers come, I'd advise for you to not complain.

  • Cardgrey
    Cardgrey Member Posts: 1,454
    edited January 2019

    This isn’t new lol on final fantasy 11. if I am tanking for u but cause of my internet connection couldn’t keep hate or do my job. damn right, I’d expect u to kick me and replace me. Why is this any different? Most people accept they are too laggy and try again later. Then others don’t care and that’s were we are at.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @Poweas said:
    Ï constantly dodge lobbys as survivor. I will not get into a killers lobby where they have 200 or more ping. Hell naw. I will find another one. Until dedicated servers come, I'd advise for you to not complain.

    It will be very interesting how the devs adress certain problems that will come up with dedicated servers :wink:

  • IamFran
    IamFran Member Posts: 1,616

    I wouldn't say "derank to get easier games" I would say "derank to get less toxic games". The higher the rank is the amount of toxic, teabaggers and tryhards SWFs grow exponentially.

  • JawsIsTheNextKiller
    JawsIsTheNextKiller Member Posts: 3,367

    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

    Yeah instead we will see a increase of DCs on the killer side :wink:

  • JawsIsTheNextKiller
    JawsIsTheNextKiller Member Posts: 3,367

    @Master said:

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

    Yeah instead we will see a increase of DCs on the killer side :wink:

    Its worse since the Winter event because now there are fewer players online there is a shortage of killers. 4 survivors will pop up at the same time who probably aren't even SWF causing killers to disconnect.

  • knell
    knell Member Posts: 595

    I hate it when people equate excessive altruism with Survive with Friends. SWF doesn't have to be (and often aren't) altruistic. In fact, if they even have a bit of intellect and self-control, they would be able to assess the situation better than any solo, and make good determination of if/when to make a save, as well as how many people is getting off the generators to do that. After all, they have much more information than the game itself provides for them.

    As a killer, counting on your opponent to be stupid and unable to control themselves doesn't make for a fun game even if you kill them all.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @knell said:
    I hate it when people equate excessive altruism with Survive with Friends. SWF doesn't have to be (and often aren't) altruistic. In fact, if they even have a bit of intellect and self-control, they would be able to assess the situation better than any solo, and make good determination of if/when to make a save, as well as how many people is getting off the generators to do that. After all, they have much more information than the game itself provides for them.

    As a killer, counting on your opponent to be stupid and unable to control themselves doesn't make for a fun game even if you kill them all.

    Funny, but survivors always claim that noone actually plays like the depip squad (intellect+self control).
    Fact is that if they genrush like crazy (intellect blabla), then its boring af as killer and it they are over-altruistic, then its a boring game imo too (even if ez 4k)

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @Master said:

    Even if I 4k a toxic SWF without them doing a single gen, I still dont enjoy the game. Survivors DC when they are tunneled and camped too, but for killers other rules hold, I know

    Now how often do you actually get a 4 man toxic swf team and not your confirmation bias teams? Also killers dc all the time when you kill their ehx totem, when they can't get someone down because they're not very good etc.

    But yes for killers there's always different rules don't do what I say not do do while I do the exact same thing like deranking to 15 for newbie stomping matches.

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @IamFran said:
    I wouldn't say "derank to get easier games" I would say "derank to get less toxic games". The higher the rank is the amount of toxic, teabaggers and tryhards SWFs grow exponentially.

    That's not really accurate since you'll run into the most toxic players in the purple ranks and ones that'll gladly sandbag their team mates in order to not depip. Those are like silver in League and they'll gladly screw you over if they're going to lose.

    At rank 1 you get less tunnelers, campers, sandbaggers, tea baggers, and general toxicity in general because the people that choose to stay there don't tolerate it much.

    If I as a killer see someone being toxic to their fellow survivors they're dying no matter what and if i'm a survivor and I see someone teabagging I'm not going to rescue them unless I've got to. The same is true and even more so for sandbagging, if you sandbag a fellow teammate I won't lift a finger to help you in any way.

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

    Yes because 4 dropping in at once is always a guaranteed 4 man swf and now with the new changes you don't know that anymore and once dedicated servers come online you most definitely won't.

    Also good grief just stop using that lame excuse, voice isn't cheating no matter how many times you repeat it. You can state that all your want and just like the others saying it it's your opinion only and it doesn't matter.

    Just like with camping and tunneling the devs have said it's not cheating, dribbling nope not either and voice is the same.

    Also you do no that actual cheating is no where near using voice and by even trying to equal the two you just prove you don't believe what you say but are using that to bolster your weak argument.

    Hacking aka modifying actual game files and lag switching which is interrupting your internet connection are considered against the rules.

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @Master said:

    Yeah instead we will see a increase of DCs on the killer side :wink:

    Wait you mean we don't already see killers dcing just because they don't like what the survivors are wearing, what items they bring or that they can't check profiles now?

    Oh and your subtle strike wink isn't fooling anyone and with region lock removal and an increased playerbase the complainers can leave and not be missed.

    Now of course you'll show your true colors like always and say you'll plan on only playing survivor to screw their lobbies over.

    Which is what you said last time which shows you don't care about the community like you claim because if you did you'd never try and justify screwing the rest of the community over by being petty.

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @Master said:

    @knell said:
    I hate it when people equate excessive altruism with Survive with Friends. SWF doesn't have to be (and often aren't) altruistic. In fact, if they even have a bit of intellect and self-control, they would be able to assess the situation better than any solo, and make good determination of if/when to make a save, as well as how many people is getting off the generators to do that. After all, they have much more information than the game itself provides for them.

    As a killer, counting on your opponent to be stupid and unable to control themselves doesn't make for a fun game even if you kill them all.

    Funny, but survivors always claim that noone actually plays like the depip squad (intellect+self control).
    Fact is that if they genrush like crazy (intellect blabla), then its boring af as killer and it they are over-altruistic, then its a boring game imo too (even if ez 4k)

    So they have to gen rush to get out, you claim it's boring because you can't get a long match and then claim it's boring the other way if too altruistic.

    Does that mean you'd want longer matches then for instances they add secondary objectives but are you going to actually play those longer matches then? Will you simply go afk and derank like you claim for easier matches which is aka boring.

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @Master all joking etc aside what would you like to make the game more interesting for you, would longer matches 10ish or so minutes plus be what gets it?

  • HatCreature
    HatCreature Member Posts: 3,298

    Some players enjoy the challenge of Rank 1, some play just to have fun, forcing your opinion on either of those types of players is pointless because neither of those players enjoy playing the other side, it's why they are arguing.

    A casual nonranked mode means the game depends solely on skill, like normal, but without the illusion of Rank you can't complain about players being better than you because you just need to get better. Rank reinforces the thought of being the best and you might not be the best and don't feel comfortable with being forced into a match with better players. Having a non ranked mode takes away that concept and replaces it with a normal random game and if you lose then oh well, if it was too hard then maybe the next one won't, etc. There is no anxiety or pressure from knowing it will be difficult. This is the only way to fix this problem of de-ranking on purpose, it's not fair to anyone that some players feel the need to de-rank so they can get casual games.

    As for SWF, if I see a 4 man SWF I dodge, the only acceptable SWF team is an overly Altruistic team that has no brain function when their buddy is on the hook. I'm ok with two groups of 2 SWF or a 2 SWF and two solo but a 3 SWF and a solo is borderline for me. It's not fair that as a Rank 10 Killer I get Rank 4s and it's also not fair that as a solo Survivor at Rank 4 I can get paired up with Rank 10 or 15 Killers. I'm a Rank 8 Killer right now but I'm not normally a competitive player, I play for fun and I have no shame in deranking so that I can get casual games instead of these try hard games where every match is a struggle for dominance, every second has to be calculated accurately in order to win.

  • Attackfrog
    Attackfrog Member Posts: 1,134

    @Rebel_Raven said:
    Broosmeister said:


    Rebel_Raven said:

    Lemme guess. You run in an swf group?

    Swfs aren't fun to play against most times. Doesn't matter if you dodge or not, others can, and will.

    Blame the survivors, too. The sweaty, the toxic, and people abusing chat. They want easy games, too.
    Survivors depip, have mixed rank swf, and often use third party chat for an edge the game is not balanced around. 

    Yes, i play with friends most of the time. I have multiple people lower than rank 10. We play the game respectfully, no one uses DS and we don't T bag killers. We don't exploit and will only be toxic to toxic killers who camp or have 100% tunnel vision.

    Most of my games vs swf i win, and i win quickly. Most of the swf are having fun and are playing with me when they see that they have a little chance to win.

    People who are scared of swf only share their worst experiences. Other people get scared too because of some whiny dude who got blindes with a flashlight once. And now PS4 is just a lobby dodging wasteland.

    Honestly, i just keep running into mixed rank SWFs that have no business vsing me. Full colors above me.
    99 out of 100 are the worst sorts of experiences. 
    Mixed rank, toxic, utterly ruthless. Generally just being zero fun as opponents.

    Like I said, blame the overwhelming amount of SWFs that ruined it for everyone.
    If most SWF groups were like the way you describe yours, they might not get dodged as much.
    I'm just not fond of gambling on SWFs, and a lot of people feel the same way.

    It's easy for red ranks to talk a big game, but they aren't in the shoes of the low ranks usually getting stomped. 

    Yes. And even if they aren't being "toxic", they are still exploiting a feature that creates a vast imbalance: communication.

    Even the most well intentioned swf group is likely abusing the game.

  • Zavri
    Zavri Member Posts: 261

    well ps4 you can derank as much as you want by dcing, nothing can be done about it.

    It's also extremely boring playing low ranks on ps4.

    I JUST bought DBD on my ps4 and I completely destroy everyone and I hit rank 1 in a single day. It's ridiculous.

    I also use a zim, which may have an impact cus ######### controllers for killer.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @powerbats said:

    @Master said:

    Even if I 4k a toxic SWF without them doing a single gen, I still dont enjoy the game. Survivors DC when they are tunneled and camped too, but for killers other rules hold, I know

    Now how often do you actually get a 4 man toxic swf team and not your confirmation bias teams? Also killers dc all the time when you kill their ehx totem, when they can't get someone down because they're not very good etc.

    But yes for killers there's always different rules don't do what I say not do do while I do the exact same thing like deranking to 15 for newbie stomping matches.

    Last time I 4ked a toxic SWF without a single gen done was about 1,5 weeks ago (I rarely play atm), I didnt enjyo the game at all

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @powerbats said:

    @Master said:

    Yeah instead we will see a increase of DCs on the killer side :wink:

    Wait you mean we don't already see killers dcing just because they don't like what the survivors are wearing, what items they bring or that they can't check profiles now?

    Oh and your subtle strike wink isn't fooling anyone and with region lock removal and an increased playerbase the complainers can leave and not be missed.

    Now of course you'll show your true colors like always and say you'll plan on only playing survivor to screw their lobbies over.

    Which is what you said last time which shows you don't care about the community like you claim because if you did you'd never try and justify screwing the rest of the community over by being petty.

    Thats exactly my point. Right now killers lobbydodge BEFORE the game, but with the new changes a increase in DCing will be pretty much guaranteed :wink:

    Dodging for items and skins will stay the same and hours were removed from profiles btw......

    And just a note, the game isnt region locked anymore^^

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @powerbats said:
    @Master all joking etc aside what would you like to make the game more interesting for you, would longer matches 10ish or so minutes plus be what gets it?

    @powerbats said:

    @Master said:

    @knell said:
    I hate it when people equate excessive altruism with Survive with Friends. SWF doesn't have to be (and often aren't) altruistic. In fact, if they even have a bit of intellect and self-control, they would be able to assess the situation better than any solo, and make good determination of if/when to make a save, as well as how many people is getting off the generators to do that. After all, they have much more information than the game itself provides for them.

    As a killer, counting on your opponent to be stupid and unable to control themselves doesn't make for a fun game even if you kill them all.

    Funny, but survivors always claim that noone actually plays like the depip squad (intellect+self control).
    Fact is that if they genrush like crazy (intellect blabla), then its boring af as killer and it they are over-altruistic, then its a boring game imo too (even if ez 4k)

    So they have to gen rush to get out, you claim it's boring because you can't get a long match and then claim it's boring the other way if too altruistic.

    Does that mean you'd want longer matches then for instances they add secondary objectives but are you going to actually play those longer matches then? Will you simply go afk and derank like you claim for easier matches which is aka boring.

    Well we gotta wait how the secondary objectives will be.... if they come at all......
    I didnt derank for easier matches, I deranked for fun matches. I dare to say that campign an overaltruistic SWF
    at higher rank is significantly easier than 12-hooking a group of "survivor plebs" but is definitely less fun

  • Poweas
    Poweas Member Posts: 5,873

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

    Your comment is amazing. You think using comms is cheating. LOL. Well, according to your logic, which completely ignores the fact that using comms is not against the rules, then surely nodding your head is cheating? Is pointing cheating?

    Tell me.

  • Poweas
    Poweas Member Posts: 5,873

    @Master said:

    @knell said:
    I hate it when people equate excessive altruism with Survive with Friends. SWF doesn't have to be (and often aren't) altruistic. In fact, if they even have a bit of intellect and self-control, they would be able to assess the situation better than any solo, and make good determination of if/when to make a save, as well as how many people is getting off the generators to do that. After all, they have much more information than the game itself provides for them.

    As a killer, counting on your opponent to be stupid and unable to control themselves doesn't make for a fun game even if you kill them all.

    Funny, but survivors always claim that noone actually plays like the depip squad (intellect+self control).
    Fact is that if they genrush like crazy (intellect blabla), then its boring af as killer and it they are over-altruistic, then its a boring game imo too (even if ez 4k)

    See I'd completely disagree with you, but now that I've actually experienced some ridiculously tryhard genrushers as killer I would like to note that I completely agree with you.

  • powerbats
    powerbats Member Posts: 7,068

    @Poweas said:

    @Master said:

    @knell said:
    I hate it when people equate excessive altruism with Survive with Friends. SWF doesn't have to be (and often aren't) altruistic. In fact, if they even have a bit of intellect and self-control, they would be able to assess the situation better than any solo, and make good determination of if/when to make a save, as well as how many people is getting off the generators to do that. After all, they have much more information than the game itself provides for them.

    As a killer, counting on your opponent to be stupid and unable to control themselves doesn't make for a fun game even if you kill them all.

    Funny, but survivors always claim that noone actually plays like the depip squad (intellect+self control).
    Fact is that if they genrush like crazy (intellect blabla), then its boring af as killer and it they are over-altruistic, then its a boring game imo too (even if ez 4k)

    See I'd completely disagree with you, but now that I've actually experienced some ridiculously tryhard genrushers as killer I would like to note that I completely agree with you.

    The issue isn't that they exist they do but that certain vocal killer mains insist it's a regular occurence with some claiming it was every game etc.

  • Supernaut
    Supernaut Member Posts: 1,532

    @Poweas said:

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

    Your comment is amazing. You think using comms is cheating. LOL. Well, according to your logic, which completely ignores the fact that using comms is not against the rules, then surely nodding your head is cheating? Is pointing cheating?

    Tell me.

    If we were meant to have voice comms in the game, then it would be an option. The fact that we have to use 3rd party software would suggest that communications between players is not intended.

  • Poweas
    Poweas Member Posts: 5,873

    @Supernaut said:

    @Poweas said:

    @JawsIsTheNextKiller said:
    It's easy to say that nobody should lobby dodge because of (suspected) SWF, but new killers soon realise the correlation between 4 survivors dropping into the lobby at the same time and the likelyhood of a near-impossible game.

    SWFs using comms to relay information is cheating. If a killer was hacking or lag switching, nobody would be telling the survivors to Git Gud.

    Your comment is amazing. You think using comms is cheating. LOL. Well, according to your logic, which completely ignores the fact that using comms is not against the rules, then surely nodding your head is cheating? Is pointing cheating?

    Tell me.

    If we were meant to have voice comms in the game, then it would be an option. The fact that we have to use 3rd party software would suggest that communications between players is not intended

    I don't want voice comms. But it's definitely not cheating lol. That's just ridiculous to say it is. It is violating the killers made up rules but not the games official rules.