Saw Chapter
What time does it go live?
Comments
-
Later.
3 -
I actually had a daily mission with Pig yesterday so I was a little sad the new tome wasn’t up yet. 😕
0 -
Will it be worth it though?
1 -
Loved this lol.
In my head, you had my mums voice saying that ❤️
4 -
uhm. Yeah? I mean.. that’s pretty damn subjective and if it’s not worth it for you… that’s okay. But pretty sure OP is interested in it otherwise they wouldn’t ask.
also tome should open in 2 hours if it’s the same time as updates.
2 -
First of all no need to be an ass about it secondly I'm asking cause pig got nerfed again just before the tome so again unless you are someone who enjoys the saw franchise but dismisses that the game for it is a broken shitshow now I will ask again do you think it will be worth it to try and go though this tome and get the stuff that the devs are trying to say is worth a #########.
0 -
I have not been an ass about it though…?
and I am not sure about all changes but haven’t there been nerfs and buffs to some addons?
and yes, for me it will be worth it, as I am not overly competitive. As I said. Subjective.
1 -
Soon.
Also can't wait for the nea skin ❤️❤️❤️ I think this is my dream skin for her and I'm so excited! 1 more hour!
1 -
Both pig changes were buffs, not nerfs. Her Last Will had its charge time penalty softened, and Amanda's Letter lets you start with 2 RBTs now instead of only one.
0 -
They don't let you start with 2 it got reduced from -3 to -2 which again like everything else now doesn't do much when you the actual issues such as the fact that pig is an m1 killer type playstyle in a game that heavily frowns that atm.
0 -
Still wondering where I was the ass here when you came into a thread where someone was just asking for starting time of the tome and you were the one trying to start a topic of if it was worth it etc. :)
1 -
That's still a buff. Pig did not get nerfed this update.
0 -
How so from what I've heard and seen the traps suck either so what difference is it if pigs base kits is still garbage at times.
0 -
Because the add-on you are describing got BETTER, not WORSE. You are objectively wrong here.
1 -
can we get a SHAW chapter instead
0 -
It adds one more avaliable trap, if the trap sucks why do you want an additional one.
0 -
But you said they nerfed pig when they actually (slightly) buffed 2 of her add-ons -.-
it can’t be that hard to grasp
1 -
You said they nerfed the Pig. That is wrong.
0 -
Ok so I mistook having more useless stuff is a nerf, but again, why would this be a buff then it's just another useless trap and a slight charge decrease. So instead of a useless nerf it's a useless buff again what does this add.
0 -
So not a nerf just a useless buff like that makes it any better.
0 -
It's a buff because her add-ons have gotten objectively better. This is not a subjective discussion. You were wrong in your original assertion. Plain and simple.
0 -
Yeah it actually does. Because you were trying to talk the devs down with your ‚mistake‘
there is enough stuff that deserves valid criticism. And I think that would actually be listened to more if people weren’t making stuff up to talk the devs down.
0 -
Yeah much like how everyone complained about mmrs borked placement since the ratios are off, COH ,DH and the maps rng instead of buffing perks that are now problematic, making a nerf that is pointless and now I guess since it's such a problem a buff for pig that does nothing so I guess I should be happy to have a one use item is still useless but oh I get one more trap that doesn't help anyone.
0 -
So instead of going to say it's actually worth a ######### you want to tell me I'm wrong because instead of calling it a worthless buff instead of a nerf.
0 -
Pig didnt get nerfed
1 -
Yes, calling you out on wrongly referring to it as a nerf was 100% the reason I replied to you in the first place. I was calling you out on being blatantly wrong.
0 -
So Ok I messed up on calling it a nerf not like it matters anyways since that part still has true apparently.
0 -
That part is 0% true. It was 0% nerf.
0 -
Is it worth using or worth the BP to buy it?
0 -
Irrelevant to my reason for calling you out.
0 -
And this is irrelevant to what I asked so I will ask again is it worth it to use or use BP to get?
0 -
Yes, it is indeed irrelevant to what you asked because I wasn't calling you out on the viability of the add-ons. You are moving on to a topic I didn't engage.
0 -
Yes but I brought it up when I said that apparently that part holds truth and since I have yet to hear your answer I can only say that while I mistook it as a nerf it is a useless buff that doesn't change anything.
0 -
All that matters to me is that you were wrong on the nerf thing.
0 -
So it doesn't matter that the buff aren't worth a ######### so it doesn't matter if they are called nerfs or buff then.
0 -
Calling them a nerf is objectively wrong. There is zero way to argue otherwise.
0 -
And not saying they are worth a damn makes it irrelevant whether I messed up and called it a nerf or not doesn't matter if the overall utility of it is still bad.
0 -
I just care that you falsely stated that Pig was nerfed. I care not about your opinions beyond that.
0 -
Good for you idc since all you care about is how I named a useless update and not if the update is worth a ######### and that's exactly what this conversation was since neither you nor the other has shown me that it's even worth calling it a buff. But I guess much like like the game itself people sure do love false victories so take your useless victory and get over yourself.
0 -
It objectively is a buff. If the numbers were improved, it's a buff. There is zero arguing against that fact. Why are you trying to defend a factually wrong claim?
0 -
Oh I have admitted to it but I also said that much like a lot of changes now to certain addons or perks it doesn't matter if I call it a nerf or a useless buff which to me if you are wanting to show me it was an actual buff item tell me if it's worth using or spending the BP for it and no one is telling me that just "Oh YoU'rE wrong BeCause You Called it a nerf" which I said over and over that I was wrong but don't call it a buff it is not worth a #########.
0 -
I'm not you just keep hounding that one thing. I keep saying however is what's the point of defending it being a buff if it isn't worth being called a buff.
0 -
I don't have to defend anything. I am objectively right.
0 -
Good for you thanks for never answering my question. Now unless you are not going to keep pulling a Patrick and not answer the question take your bruised ego elsewhere I already admit that calling calling getting "one whole extra useless trap" a nerf is objectively wrong but idc if it doesn't matter why bother calling buff if it is not a buff worth a damn.
0 -
Bruised ego? You were the one who has spent all this time trying to validate your incorrect claims. It's called a buff because the numbers were buffed. :P
0 -
Is it worth a ######### yes or no? that's all I asked since you can be bothered to answer they why consider it a buff and not just useless tweaking "it adds one trap" ok it does but does it matter if the traps suck that is all I asked after I admitted to saying it wasn't a nerf but since you can't get off that then why bother to keep hounding me about it other than to stroke your sorry excuse of an ego.
0 -
I don't care what you asked. I was only correcting your errors. Both about "it's a nerf" and "it's not a buff."
0 -
Maybe I say it's not a buff is because due to no one saying is it worth using then it's not a buff and why should I care then about what I call it "it's not a nerf" fine whatever that's done and over with but that doesn't mean it's a buff either.
0 -
That's not how it works. There is objectively zero way you can argue it's not a buff. It's literally in the patch notes.
0 -
Means nothing same with apparently the add on "buff" since you keep worrying about that like it's a big issue.
0
