SBMM DOESN'T WORK. KILLER STATS FROM 100 MATCHES TO PROVE.

The simple fact is survivors lose even with this much of survivor favor.

I stand by what I said, the person I responded to spoke with hyperbole and misrepresented reality. Given that this is a thread about statistics, people should be culpable for that nonsense.

Edit: This doesn't mean SSBM isn't a ######### show. We know it is. My whole contention with the OP's nonsense is that he's not informed about what makes a statistically significant, or accurate, sample size. He makes 0 effort to control variables and his data is largely junk. The fact that he speaks in absolutisms about things he clearly misunderstood is just icing.

I disagree. You can run some pretty cool data collection experiments in DBD. It hurts that they don't have an API that allows us to call data by user, but you can do it manually. You can eliminate SSBM bias by playing 50 games on every killer extremely sweaty before starting your data collection efforts, and then you can eliminate further variables by isolating and using high value, generic perks that address current metas across the entire roster. You can reduce feast or famine results by excluding NoED and certain iridescent add ons. You can exclude games where DC's tamper with the actual outcome of a match and you can VOD everything to gather extra statistics at the end that will allow you to sort and present the data more accurately.

You don't have to do something perfect for me to respect it. You just have to do something not utterly lazy that yields no valuable conclusions.

Then I don't see the need to continue this conversation. I did criticize it, it is junk data that yields nothing conclusive, despite how hard he pushed his bias. Which is really my only contention with what you originally said to me, that I'm reading too into it. Sounds like this conversation was completely unnecessary.

Ive switched to playing killer a lot more since i changed to PC. I find killer im getting mostly 4k or 3k. Occasionally destroyed and only a couple hooks.

The biggest problem with matchmaking is it puts too much weight on my kills as a whole so when i pick a new killer my games are against fairly good players and i dont get a chance to even practice or play much while im trying to learn their abilities.

I think its harder to win consistently as survivor (mostly playing as a duo or 3), but depends mostly on RNG and how the killer decides to play.

One thing ive noticed is if im playing killer i can often change the entire way a game is playing by deciding to slug, proxy camp etc. Whereas for survivor youre forced into trying to fit around that which is a lot harder.

Saying that, killer is still the more stressful of the roles as youre not in a team so i do get it more from both sides now to be fair.