If this doesn't change your mind about fnaf being in dbd then I don't know what will
Comments
-
Man, there's really people out there that somehow think donations to a politician has the same impact donating to charity/support networks does, huh? I wonder which one is the one that has the legal power to create legislation. Those darn people biased over... uh, human rights. Yeah, screw 'em.
3 -
Also this is a joke I made a post addressing the extremes of both ends of the debate
0 -
Can you not be that guy for 5 freaking minutes?
1 -
I don't know, could you stop making disingenuous and misrepresentative arguments for 5 minutes?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
4 -
If people like you where in charge of what license killers we got we would not get Pinhead "because it Demonizes people of BDSM or kink"
Oh I'm the one making disingenuous and misrepresenting arguments your the Numbskull who still thinks that Scott is still a bigot Can you just let people enjoy things without throwing a hissy fit bout whether or not a killer robot zombie Rabbit gets in the game
Honestly arguing with you makes me so annoyed because you and I are wasting our time you and I are acting like children but If I'm the clown then you are the Circus can we just be adults for a moment.
Plus from earlier arguments from you I'm guessing you are of the lgbtq+ you are not defending your Human rights your just being a complete and utter Douche
1 -
Man, people will really out themselves of their own volition, huh.
4 -
Huh you still don't get it?
0 -
Anti-LGBT people when other anti-LGBT people make video games:
3 -
It's already been pointed out, but donating to the Trevor project, as important as it is, doesn't have the same effect on a country full of LGBTQIA+ people as donating to a politician who passes laws targeting them.
At best, Scott is willing to let people who aren't cis and straight get their rights trampled on as long as he pays less in taxes. At best. Given the politicians he supports only have 3 policy goals, and 2 of those are about screwing over marginalized groups, that's just the reality of the situation. I appreciate the charitable contributions he's made, but no amount justifies later supporting a man who literally kicked all trans people out of the military for no reason.
4 -
this game needs more furries. hell of a lot more fun to talk to than most of the people who play it already
1 -
Many fnaf fans where less then pleased with scott about fnaf including myself but it was likely more that he didn't research the message that the these politicians where spreading were harmful and he likely just didn't know
0 -
Can we not?
Anytime someone does this, the forum explodes and gets closed due to chaotic comments.
I rather hear people complain back and forth about Springtrap fitting in the game or Springtrap does not fit then bringing that stuff up all the time.
Scott donated to charities which then someone leaked the donation information on Twitter for "Laughs and giggles". Not going to agree with what he had done but the man had been DDOS a couple of times while having death threats sent to him and his family. I am not gonna bring up information since people can just search it themselves and do the research before jumping the gun.
Scott retired and is giving the IP to someone else. All he can really do is just give suggestions or opinions for the future of the franchise to the new owner.
Overall can we just get back to saying Springtrap is too Kiddish or FNAF has dark lore?
0 -
I agree 100%
0 -
You mean, the politicians he said:
Even if there were candidates who had better things to say to the LGBT community directly, and bigger promises to make, I believed that their stances on other issues would have ended up doing much greater harm to those communities than good.
about? As in, the politicians he literally was aware of their opinions on LGBT+ people about?
"leaked the donation information" You mean, the information literally required by federal law in the U.S. to be publicly available information?
3 -
there goes the thread
2 -
My bad, I forgot "correcting blatantly false and misleading statements" is nitpicking.
3 -
Your right sadly I going to get a mod to close this post
0 -
Like I said before. Actually, look up information before jumping the gun. There were better options, but he donated to ones that had military power.....which again I don't agree with his donation choices..
Also I say leaked because that person used a website and looked up that specific person info and shared it full well knowing what damage it will cause. Like what random person looks up some person's donations randomly for no reason? Guy did not even care that Scott was being DDOS or getting death threats to him, his kids, and wife that was pregnant and was pretending none of this started with them.
Not saying I agree with his actions, but labeling him and threatening to cause harm because one out of the many charities had something to do with that certain thing is a tad overboard. Hating the guy is one thing and thinking his franchise is dumb but putting a hurtful label on him and causing harm to him is just 100% wrong. Also not just talking to you but everyone who brings this up everywhere.
I will not try to convince you, but atleast look at his history before sinking the ship without knowing what's inside.
Again, as I said before. Can we please, for the love of god just switch back to complaining about Springtrap! I am pretty sure Mods are getting tired of this political crap.
Lastly BHVR did not give a NO to Fnaf and was on the Survey last year so it still can be ingame.
At this point its Steve in Smash. Either you like it or not its bound to come at some point.
0 -
I have a question, FNAF characters would be allowed to use the Pride charm or is locked for them?.
2 -
Like this lovely comment is what I am referring to.
It's like people want an excuse to talk about Anti LGBT and makes me sick.
1 -
agree 100%
0 -
Closing this as the OP just seems to want to argue with anyone who disagrees with their points.
Think we've had enough of that, hence closing the previous posts as well.
6
