It's not racist lol
Comments
-
As you should
(/j)
3 -
You've evidently not spent as much time online as I have...
It's the ultimate Kafkatrap.
Say or do something with the best of intentions and someone takes it the wrong way? Racist.
Attempt to say you're not racist? Racist.
Take this example, for instance. I could easily see someone distorting what the individual had to say about Claudette blending in as somehow racist, because for a certain type of armchair activist - everything is racist. And they won't shy away from literally saying that everything/everyone is racist and that you have to point it all out.
Hence, people who want to say something not racist but easily distorted will preface what they are saying with something like this.
3 -
Me too
0 -
I don’t play with Claudette’s unless I’m in a 2 or 3 man and I’m not gonna make my friends leave the lobby. They are terrible and I wish I could sell Claud for some bloodpoints
0 -
👀they are always good when I play with them lmao
0 -
I've seen more good Claudettes than bad, and when they're good, they're really good. The worst player's I've played with are Megs, Leons and Jills.
Ignore the hate, everyone is just jealous of Claudette's supremacy.
0 -
Claudette players have a stereotype for hiding in corners and self caring instead of actually doing anything that will progress the game, and it's a pretty accurate stereotype.
2 -
Or rather it says something about todays cultural climate where literally everything is called racist. He probably just didn't want to leave any chance of misconstruing his statement.
3 -
Well said. I've seen people get called a racist for very stupid reasons. It's crazy.
4 -
This sums it up pretty well.
0 -
An oldie but my favourite Claudette meme.
2 -
As a Claudette, I take offense of that slander targeted at my sisters.
Joke aside, as a killer I see way more Megs and Dwights being utterly useless than Claudettes.
The only problem with Claudette is the P3 "Kill on sight" skin.
0 -
Hex: But
Whenever you say "But" anything you said previously gets the exposed status and the aura of your real intention is reveal to your interlocutor.
Also I don't know what does it have to do with racism, is like those ppl saying "no homo" for no reason lol
0 -
The latter is usually said as a joke, generally as a follow-up to an unintentional innuendo.
These days, 'but' is mostly used as an attempt to preempt whatever it is you are about to say being deliberately twisted into some evidence of bigotry.
0 -
The thing is, i get in chases with claudette, but a lot of times - depending on map and availibility of tools like paletts - i leave the chase without going down, just being hit once. However, even if i waste the same amount of the killers time which i would do if i had gone down instead, people blame you for "not taking aggro". Because they only register what is happening once you go down. They dont know who was in a chase, unless they are an swf. They dont know if the killer hit you while passing a gen and continuing his chase of another survivor, or if you juked them.
And last but not least: no unhook points from you. I had games where was chased by the killers 4 times, juked him every time, i did 2 gens alone and worked on 2 more, did 3 unhooks, and still people told me i was just hidding all game...Take it from me, a lot of players have no clue unless you play the only way they think is viable.
1 -
Karu you know I only urban evade when I wanna make you mad megheads live for the S P E E D BABIE
1 -
I am being unfairly targeted due to my status as a Meg-anti in this essay I shall-
0 -
I generally don't mind Claudettes - they hide a lot but don't tend to get anything done or be annoying.
It's the Aces, Ashes, Janes or worst of all, Dwights that worry me.
Aces just tend to be a combination of being toxic and cocksure, then cable-pulling the second you down them.
Ashes...no less than 4 have, in recent memory, decided to play hide and seek around the map the second the game is lost. Not sneaking around trying to do gens or anything, just hiding and stalling the game to be annoying.
Janes - Of the hackers I've encountered, maybe 1/2 were Janes. There's also a weird tendency for Janes to be AFK in lockers.
Dwights - any Dwight in a silly outfit is going to be an obnoxious little gremlin just out to cause you misery.
0 -
I'm pretty sure that eveytime someone says "no homo", there is nothing specifically homosexual about what's being said. Usually an unnecesary "joke". Just like the person here said "no racist" while there was nothing racist about it. It was about Claudettes' cliche playstyle and not her skin color, i'm pretty sure.
It is true that sometimes you need to be more careful with what you say so that the meaning of your words don't get twisted, as you said. Although there's plenty of times when that's not the case and you can clearly see that everything that follows that "but" contradicts what preceeded it.
0 -
"No homo" - yes, that's what I mean. It's sort of a punchline to a statement that was an unintentional double entendre.
Eh, I generally try to take everything people say with as much charity as possible. There's an annoying tendency for certain individuals these days to infer literally the worst possible meaning to anything someone says and run with it hard, and enough people will get behind them to cause trouble, even if they are being obviously ridiculous.
The example that always comes to mind is this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/01/30/army-deletes-tweet-referring-to-chinks-in-armor-after-racism-accusations/
Social media was a mistake.
1
