+2500h and I can't stop these guys from doing all gens

They are one of the best survivors from South America, they are competitive players and have won several tournaments. So, yes, it won't be easy to deal with them, but you did a pretty good job honestly

This is the issue with some killer mains, you just stomped a team and you are still complaining.

You are not supposed to stomp teams while playing at 70% of your skill. If the opposing team is trying to win, you are supposed to be able to beat them by trying as hard, which you did.

In this match you were clearly the superior player, I don't understand why you would want to play against adversaries which are clearly below your skill level.

This game clearly shows a mismatch in skill: You were SUBSTANTIALLY better than the SWF group, if you had won before the 5 gens being made it would have been a complete and DISASTROUS mismatch.

The only complaint I shall accept from your part is the stress of a game like that, which is ABSOLUTELY understandable. Unfortunately it is a competitive PVP game and I don't see how this could be solved unless you were to stomp teams even more.

If you did you would probably not feel the same amount of stress, but it would be an AWFUL experience for the survivors.

I don't know what to tell you, maybe the new unranked mode will give memey games

Excellent point, so many on both sides tend to frame it as "if all gens are done, the killer lost" as if endgame isn't still a part of the game. Even I have a hard time coping with the idea alot of the time. The buzzer that signifies all gens done sounds like the sound of losing to me now, so it's hard to say "well I am still in a decent position to win here" even disregarding the endgame perk set.

This is the problem with kills not accurately showing what happened during a match.

These guys could’ve just not escaped and let the killer kill them at the end and despite all the gens being done and exit gates opened in 6 minutes or so people here would be saying you got a 3/4K so it’s fine and balanced.

Player skill and strategy outweighs perks. If you play well and your opponents don’t then you will almost always win even if you have no perks. It’s why streamers have consistently in the past done long strings of 3-4k games with literally no perks, they simply play better than average players and the old emblem system was less consistent at matchmaking high skill players against other high skill players.

So it’s quite possible the survivors played at least as well as the killer did in this match which is why it felt close despite the lack of perks. Perks make a difference when opponents are otherwise evenly matched in skill but they don’t do as much to help a weaker player beat a stronger one.

And they could be just as good as the survivors, after all they got the 3k and the survivors had bad loadouts. For all we know the results could have been 1-3 kills if they had better perks.

You'll probably just have to accept that all the gens are gonna get done. That's the new standard the devs want, because their standard is 2 survivors escaping, and only 1 can escape through hatch. And these people saying that it's fine because you got 1 single 3k, out of all your crushing losses I'm sure, are only looking at the kills. You don't know the whole story of a match from just the kills, and that's the basis of the argument for hooks being healthier to match progression. If you got 3 kills, you could have gone for 11 hooks, or you could have had a 1-hook face camp and then 2 hooks on the other survivors from NOED. But overall, people are missing the point. It's not the result sometimes, it's the stress that makes the match not fun.