so many toxic survivors why??? and ban those players please? 2 game in row
.
Comments
-
First of all - no naming & shaming on the forums, you have to edit out the names.
Secondly, if you feel that anyone has broken the rules of the game, then please use the in game report system to report them - being "toxic" in itself is not a reason to report, as there is no definitive definition of what being toxic actually is, to some people it is flashlight blinding for example which is definitely not reportable.
8 -
@iisultan369 said:
.
Toxic because they use DS?
0 -
as there is no definitive definition of what being toxic actually is
Toxic:
Playing in Your strategic interests.2 -
no because they harassment me in the chat....
1 -
If they harassed you in the chat, report them and don't respond since that just encourages more toxicity and instead let them get dealt with by the mods.
1 -
The game's balance it out the window. We have infinite loopers, toxic tryhards who think they are actually "good" at the game, facecampers (because thats the only way to reliably play as a killer right now), and all the other nonsense. Less killers in the higher ranks resulting in too long wait times for survivors. All that crap. If the devs don't reduce chasetimes there's actually no hope. It's as asymmetrical as it can be. And I refuse to play this **** until they do something. There are plenty other good mp games after all.
Oh and to come back to the topic. When players find a game where one side is heavily favored and way easier to play then they let everyone know how "awesome" they are. In the worst way. Like in real life.
Post edited by IceD34ler on1 -
@IceD34ler said:
The game's balance it out the window. We have infinite loopers, toxic tryhards who think they are actually "good" at the game, facecampers (because thats the only way to reliably play as a killer right now), and all the other nonsense. Less killers in the higher ranks resulting in too long wait times for survivors. All that crap. If the devs don't reduce chasetimes there's actually no hope. It's as asymmetrical as it can be. And I refuse to play this **** until they do something. There are plenty other good mp games after all.Oh and to come back to the topic. When players find a game where one side is heavily favored and way easier to play then they let everyone know how "awesome" they are. In the worst way. Like in real life.
If you can only get kills by camping then the issue is you.
Red ranks, swf sabo squad and I've only ever camped 1x never camped this game still got them and let 4th person escape but yep you can only get kills by camping.
1 -
@powerbats said:
@IceD34ler said:
The game's balance it out the window. We have infinite loopers, toxic tryhards who think they are actually "good" at the game, facecampers (because thats the only way to reliably play as a killer right now), and all the other nonsense. Less killers in the higher ranks resulting in too long wait times for survivors. All that crap. If the devs don't reduce chasetimes there's actually no hope. It's as asymmetrical as it can be. And I refuse to play this **** until they do something. There are plenty other good mp games after all.Oh and to come back to the topic. When players find a game where one side is heavily favored and way easier to play then they let everyone know how "awesome" they are. In the worst way. Like in real life.
If you can only get kills by camping then the issue is you.
Red ranks, swf sabo squad and I've only ever camped 1x never camped this game still got them and let 4th person escape but yep you can only get kills by camping.
Good for you, bad for me I guess. Btw. camping is a legit strategy. If you don't know how to counter it, well, I'll tell you. It's gen rush. And if 3 out of 4 people teabagg the whole time I enjoy my self-made "nope" emote while facecamping.
If you only have a toxic response to the word "camping" in my post, why exactly do you quote my whole post anyways? Why even go personal here ? The toxicity has reached new levels I guess.
0 -
@powerbats said:
If you can only get kills by camping then the issue is you.What if you camp and kill everyone?
0 -
@Orion said:
@powerbats said:
If you can only get kills by camping then the issue is you.What if you camp and kill everyone?
Actually, right now, with massive camping I end up having 2 kills on average. Pretty gut
0 -
Oh, Dead by Daylight in a nutshell.
0 -
Camp them. Face camp them and nod your head till they die!
0 -
@IceD34ler said:
Good for you, bad for me I guess. Btw. camping is a legit strategy. If you don't know how to counter it, well, I'll tell you. It's gen rush. And if 3 out of 4 people teabagg the whole time I enjoy my self-made "nope" emote while facecamping.
If you only have a toxic response to the word "camping" in my post, why exactly do you quote my whole post anyways? Why even go personal here ? The toxicity has reached new levels I guess.
Rank 1 both sides I don't have an issue with either sides legit strategies really, I just don't need to camp to get kills.
Also if you're going to complain about toxicity you should practice what you preach.
1 -
This is how you handle someone you know to be a trouble child if you see they haven't been banned yet.KissyKissy said:Camp them. Face camp them and nod your head till they die!
0 -
@powerbats said:
@IceD34ler said:
Good for you, bad for me I guess. Btw. camping is a legit strategy. If you don't know how to counter it, well, I'll tell you. It's gen rush. And if 3 out of 4 people teabagg the whole time I enjoy my self-made "nope" emote while facecamping.
If you only have a toxic response to the word "camping" in my post, why exactly do you quote my whole post anyways? Why even go personal here ? The toxicity has reached new levels I guess.
Rank 1 both sides I don't have an issue with either sides legit strategies really, I just don't need to camp to get kills.
Also if you're going to complain about toxicity you should practice what you preach.
Dude, that's awesome. Rank 1 both sides, no camping, insane. I mean, you have to be in the minority to be that high up.
Didn't quite understand your second sentence, can you please explain? I'm german, sorry.
0 -
@IceD34ler said:
Dude, that's awesome. Rank 1 both sides, no camping, insane. I mean, you have to be in the minority to be that high up.
Didn't quite understand your second sentence, can you please explain? I'm german, sorry.
Actually not that hard depending on the player to get to rank one both sides, some of it boils down to playtime and quite a few can get there.
The 2nd part I was being sarcastic so let me continue.
Der zweite Teil war ich sarkastisch, also lasst mich fortfahren.
Wenn Sie sich über Toxizität beschweren, sollten Sie auch das üben, was Sie predigen.
0 -
Camping is a legit strategy? Umm, camping is the WEAKEST way to win as the killer, and creates a toxicity that makes most gamers not want to pick up this game. I play with a group of 6 people and we all try new games out, seeing what has good replay value as a multiplayer game. I am the only one out of all 6 that will even keep this game installed because the others got so fed up with leveling up survivors only to have killers sit by the hooks and prevent anyone from rescuing them. They lose their items and don't get many blood shards because the killer is too lazy to allow the game to be challenging for them. Even with the blood shard penalty, killers still camp or walk 10 yards away and watch the hook the entire time. This game should be about everyone having fun, not just the killer.
4 -
@Orion said:
@powerbats said:
If you can only get kills by camping then the issue is you.What if you camp and kill everyone?
Than you played potatoes.
1
