You've got to respect the amount of patience the average survivor has

Broosmeister said:

Sitting in a game now with 2 survivors in an exit gate. I refuse to go and push them out. I'm not going to give them the satisfaction of T-bagging me. I'm just listening to music right now, and also watching some Youtube vids. I don't mind that they waste their own time. This has been going on for like 30 minutes now, and i have a feeling that it will take even more time.

Can i report the 2 people for holding the game hostage since they are the ones refusing to leave?

Since you are too stubborn to swallow your pride and push them out, you can report them, but they didn't take you hostage, so it won't do anything.

@HawkAyeTheNoo said:
You could just push them out and move on to next game, does tbagging really trigger you that much. Grow a pair. 

There is always at least one triggered survivor in threads like these, defending the other kiddos.

To the OP: depending on your time zone, if possible, just play a little later in the evening. I have found there is FAR less juvenile behavior in later games (bed time and all). Just be wary of school breaks...all the kiddies stay up late and mommy let's em have internet access.

@Vietfox said:
Broosmeister said:

Can i report the 2 people for holding the game hostage since they are the ones refusing to leave?

If they were hiding all the time and you didn't know were they are then yeah, but you decided to let them do that since you knew they were at the exit gate. You were as stubborn as them and you decided to not push them out, you held the game hostage as well.

How is an afk killer holding the game hostage?

Them standing at the gate waiting for you to hit them/tbag you and leave, is not taking game hostage.
Yes, I would do the same thing you did, by not escorting them out, but still, it's not game hostage situation.

Last person walking around the map with P3 Claudette with old Darkest Moonlight and you had no whispers or any other means of tracking... that could be considered being a game hostage situation.

@Vietfox said:
@NoShinyPony said:

@Vietfox said:

Broosmeister said:

Can i report the 2 people for holding the game hostage since they are the ones refusing to leave?

If they were hiding all the time and you didn't know were they are then yeah, but you decided to let them do that since you knew they were at the exit gate. You were as stubborn as them and you decided to not push them out, you held the game hostage as well.

How is an afk killer holding the game hostage?

I mean that op let that happen. Had the choice to hit them and force them leave but didn't want to because of pointless pride.

That's not holding the game hostage, then.

Broosmeister said:

Sitting in a game now with 2 survivors in an exit gate. I refuse to go and push them out. I'm not going to give them the satisfaction of T-bagging me. I'm just listening to music right now, and also watching some Youtube vids. I don't mind that they waste their own time. This has been going on for like 30 minutes now, and i have a feeling that it will take even more time.

Can i report the 2 people for holding the game hostage since they are the ones refusing to leave?

Take Franklin's demise and hit the ones with toolbox or flashlight as they run out. Makes it worth it.

@Broosmeister said:
SenzuDuck said:

"Me letting them take the game hostage"

I don't think you understand, if you "let" them do it then it simply isn't.

You can't let them take the game hostage, that implies you have a choice, taking the game hostage is a loss/dc no choice kind of thing.

They are staying in the game for no other reason than to taunt me. I'm not letting that happen. Maybe 'taking the game hostage' is indeed not the correct term to describe this situation. But they are still refusing to participate in normal gameplay. And you can report people for that.

I was sitting next to the other exit gate just in case someone would come over to that one. So i was guarding that gate, which is one of my objectives.

Awh, just hold w and force them out, close your eyes if pixels bouncing up and down upset you so much

@Rebel_Raven said:
Peanits said:

Broosmeister said:

Vietfox :

I report when things aren't fine by me.
Again, you had the option to push them out but you didn't want to, it's on you too mate.
In another thread about the same topic @Peanits stated the same, it's not reportable if you don't want to do anything and just wait.

Me letting them taking the game hostage doesn't neglect that they are in fact taking the game hostage. Which is reportable.

Keyword there is let. It is only holding the game hostage if you literally cannot end the match, but here you could just by chasing them.

What you're saying is not bannable. It's be like if the survivors all his in corners instead of fixing generators and then reported you for not killing them. It's be ridiculous. Mutual stubbornness is not a bannable offense.

How survivor sided this response is leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
This is basically letting survivors switch from playing the game to practically griefing with zero repercussions. 
As soon as they have no one to rescue, all that's left is escape as an objective. If they do not take that, they have basically stopped playing the game.

Most killers absolutely cannot compete any more objectives at this point as the survivors are in a safe zone where most killers are powerless. They have no more objectives as they cannot down a survivor unless that survivor lets them. Hence "just chase them out" because that's about all the powerless killer can do.

The way I see it, it's "not bannable" because it's so rampant, and survivors must be protected.
Allowed to have their fun until the end game is reworked. 
Killers must suffer because, well, screw killers, basically. 
If it were bannable, it would practically be survivor genocide.

Well @peanits is mostly a killer and from what I've seen he's incredibly unbaised.

All you have to do is walk towards the gate I don't get why there's so many people that find that offensive, you just hold W and the match is over, but you'd rather sit around for an hour and then moan on a forum, I've seen these posts a few times now it's ridiculous.

@Rebel_Raven said:
SenzuDuck said:

@Rebel_Raven said:

Peanits said:

Broosmeister said:



Vietfox :

I report when things aren't fine by me.

Again, you had the option to push them out but you didn't want to, it's on you too mate.

In another thread about the same topic @Peanits stated the same, it's not reportable if you don't want to do anything and just wait.

Me letting them taking the game hostage doesn't neglect that they are in fact taking the game hostage. Which is reportable.

Keyword there is let. It is only holding the game hostage if you literally cannot end the match, but here you could just by chasing them.

What you're saying is not bannable. It's be like if the survivors all his in corners instead of fixing generators and then reported you for not killing them. It's be ridiculous. Mutual stubbornness is not a bannable offense.

How survivor sided this response is leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

This is basically letting survivors switch from playing the game to practically griefing with zero repercussions. 

As soon as they have no one to rescue, all that's left is escape as an objective. If they do not take that, they have basically stopped playing the game.

Most killers absolutely cannot compete any more objectives at this point as the survivors are in a safe zone where most killers are powerless. They have no more objectives as they cannot down a survivor unless that survivor lets them. Hence "just chase them out" because that's about all the powerless killer can do.

The way I see it, it's "not bannable" because it's so rampant, and survivors must be protected. 

Allowed to have their fun until the end game is reworked. 

Killers must suffer because, well, screw killers, basically. 

If it were bannable, it would practically be survivor genocide.

Well @peanits is mostly a killer and from what I've seen he's incredibly unbaised.

All you have to do is walk towards the gate I don't get why there's so many people that find that offensive, you just hold W and the match is over, but you'd rather sit around for an hour and then moan on a forum, I've seen these posts a few times now it's ridiculous.

Doesn't matter if he's a killer player, survivor player, or both. This response is overwhelmingly in favor of letting survivors grief. There is no way around it.

All the survivors have to do is walk out the gate. They don't even have to push the attack button, or worry a out being juked, or blinded, or whatever. But they don't. They wait to be toxic. They know that they're unstoppable. 
And killers are damned either way. Either feed the survivors,o r stay away and let them feel whatever they want.
At least killers can protest by not giving in. Let survivors waste their time. We will do something else.

The fact they wait to long is ridiculous. 

They often do not deserve what ever they want from waiting at the gate. We're tired of giving it. We will not anymore.

The whole "We're getting one over them" mentality is hilarious, I'm sure they've left to do something as well.

and while yes I agree that they could walk out too, why should they? It's both stubborness it's the same situation with the hatch, why should either side do anything.

I've caught so many cocky survivors in exit gates that I'm glad they sit and wait for me to hold W as I might catch one out.

I can't believe I'm arguing with a rank 15 killer about this though, lmao.

Rebel_Raven said:

Honestly,  it should be a reportable offense.

the instant the survivors decided they would not achieve the goal survivors have of escape or rescue, they essentially decided to stop playing, and switched to what's more likely griefing.

I dont entirely care what survivor biased response I got when I asked about it.