So Scott Jund also thinks that Hillbilly is hardest killer in game
Comments
-
It took the devs years to nerf keys and moris. That alone proves they donโt know how certain things affect the balance in this game.
Solo queue, low tier killers, SWF, and then nurse/Blight. All at such different power levels, and very little being done to truly fix it. Taking the devs at their word, if they ever even said that nurse isn't a bottleneck (which she very obviously is), is quite naive.
0 -
Because solo queue IS fine.
The devs canยดt fix bad teammates that instantly dc on the first down or suicide on the first hook. Thats also something i have been repeating ad nauseum.
Look, i know you had a hard time as solo survivor and i usually donยดt do this. But if you send me a friend request on steam or discord. Iยดll find some time to play together with you.
2 -
Now back to the topic of Billy being harder than Nurse.
Billy was the gold standard on how a good killer should be balanced. Both sides agreed that he didnยดt require changes/nerfs (which is usually rare). There where just some issues with a couple of addons but his basekit was perfectly fine. Now his rework went totally overboard with the heat mechanic and he suddenly became a very rare sight.
But honestly, Nurse and Billy are not really comparable.
0 -
Solo Q is def not fine. I would be lying if I wasn't curious on how you play survivor though. My discord: Marvin#7735
1 -
If we're talking about a buff more in the flavor of being easier to handle rather than straight-up stronger, there's probably a simple way.
With a caveat: purist old-school Billies won't like it. But let's be honest, there's fewer of them than Twins mains. And we're talking about making the power more palatable to encourage more players to try it out.
What I'm alluding to is to change how 99'ing works. Basically remove the necessity of tapping to keep the chainsaw at 99. It would work somewhat as crossover of Plague/Huntress/Demo.
You just charge up by holding down m2 and when the bar is full the saw stays at 99. Want to start a sprint? Press m1. Want to de-charge instead? Release m2. Want to sprint as soon as the saw is ready? Spam m1 while holding down m2 to charge.
Want to keep the saw charged at a lower percentage. Well, you're out of luck there, you will still have to do it the old way by fast tapping. But that won't be that big of a deal.
This will remove those awkward situations where a sprint accidentally goes off or the bar is not actually 99'd and it takes that extra millisecond to start sprinting.
That's what I can think of.
2 -
Let us know how you two get on
5 -
Iโm curious about that too
5 -
Scott also said that the only thing to learn on nurse is muscle memory and completely ignored the massive skill curve that is learning to read survivors and their pathing. Soooooooooooo idk if his opinion is worth praising when he ignores the hardest part of nurse.
6 -
Billy for me personally is way harder than Nurse but one thing people conveniently pretend to ignore every very single time Nurse is discussed
Billy without a chainsaw like everyone else can chase survivors normally
His power unlike Nurse's is INSTA DOWN, you need to hit survivors twice to down them with Nurse, so yeah I do think his power should be harder to use. That's why everyone plays Bubba instead - way easier to use with far less effort.
Every killer who has insta down without perks/add ons should be hard to use
0 -
I wouldn't say Myers, GF, or bubba are especially hard to use.
0 -
He's a youtuber with an opinion nothing more.
Now just like the forums, youtube folk also belong to a really exclusive club called "ANYONE".
Guy with keyboard and opinion is somehow trumped by guy with microphone and opinion.
It's a regular Joe Public opinion off, which echo chamber will win find out tomorrow in the generic dome... action action action...
2 -
Hey another this streamer said this or that so it must be true. ๐คฆ๐ปโโ๏ธ
And than of all the streamers you choose him ๐คฆ๐ปโโ๏ธ๐คฃ
2 -
Learning survivorsโ pathing is something you should be learning on every killer. Not just Nurse.
4 -
You know the pathing changes based on the killer, it was clear what he meant.
3 -
Whatโs different about it? Survivors being more โunpredictableโ (the normal Nurse โcounterplayโ people bring up)?
3 -
If I said yes, would that end it here, or was your response just prepping to discount that idea wholesale?
You know what he meant, and you know pathing against nurse is substantially different from standard M1 killers who have to play tiles.
2 -
Everything. Or it should be. Because you aren't running tiles for optimal use of the window or the pallet against a Nurse. Pathing conventionally is pointless and counterproductive. And that's where 90% of players go wrong.
8 -
Another nobody who thinks he's got a valid point.
Billy isn't hard he's just useless now.
0 -
Billy is not easy to play as.
It's really easy to see the difference between someone who is good as Billy and someone isn't in loops.
1 -
Nurse is different. Learning where survivors are gonna go both in terms of tiles and map location is needed to win against good survivors and takes a long time to learn.
2 -
if you actually need to learn loops and tricks especifically for a killer then i agree it is a hard killer to play/master, a true game is about learning not relying on perks and op powers. Most nurse players just have muscle memory and bring some good perks that snowball easily because its a nurse... they arent good, the same for survivors remove the "small pp build" and boom almost like a brand new player
0 -
Just saying that "never" is a pretty strong word.
It took like 2 minutes.
0 -
No one really asked for billy nerfs anyways and it was definitely not needed for the game, what's your point.
0 -
It took me 10 minutes scrolling through my own comments while knowing the month I'd have to search for.
So let's just say, I'm a bit sceptical about those 2 minutes.
1 -
I've seen you say this multiple times. I hate Iron Will. I have videos about how much i hate iron will. Why do you keep saying this
7 -
Yeh.
0 -
It comes from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4feujM2EgxY
You said that you hate playing against IW, but you think it's fair and not overpowered. Then you made the entire video gushing about all the cool plays survivors can make where they force the killer to have to guess where they went because of Iron Will since the killer can't hear or has any idea what the survivor is doing when LOS is broken. It's exactly the same thing you said made Spirit boring, low skill, uncounterable etc because the survivor had to guess what the Spirit was doing. It's not OP making the killer player guess cause of IW, but Spirit needed to be nerfed.
2 -
Devils advocate for 2.
Myers: has limited stalk per player which in turn means limited t3 instant downs especially if players get one hooked for whatever reason.
Ghostface: can be forced out of stealth somewhat easily even by the person he's stalking.
0 -
I actually like being able to take perspectives from Scott, Otz, True, and other similar streamers who have a lot of experience. Not because I take any of their words as infallible, but because they have different experiences and different perspectives. The big thing that separates the 4 and 5 digit+ hours players who play this game for a living is that they tend to have a lot of both theory and field testing that incorporate a lot of their opinions on a lot of aspects of the game. They are an extremely useful resource for a game's health, both from a development/balancing perspective as well as an educational one for players.
The best part is that they don't always agree on everything while still having very solid arguments for many of their opinions within the game. They can outright disagree on things and have neither side be wrong, just having free radical variables that affect how they formulate their opinion. The sample set is a big part of why their arguments tend to hold more weight for this very reason: if you were comparing variables between 10/100/1000 matches, the larger the sample size the more possibility your perspective will adapt based on what is experienced over the set.
If you have a situation where people can respectfully disagree while exchanging information formulated from their own well researched perspective, it creates a very healthy exchange of ideas. Its a refreshing change from "I dislike x so please change it"
1 -
He's right but that's not exactly a hot take, it's been a widespread opinion for many months now. More and more people are realizing that the "Nurse is hard" take is simply fallacious. Also, how pathetic do you have to be to consider the opinion of a streamer inherently more worthwhile than any other. Fanboys are such a sad sight.
0 -
- I consider his statement way more valuable than just some random guy from dbd forum
He literally is just a random guy from dbd forums.
3 -
Pivot in steps, dude.
0 -
I actually think that Cenobite is the hardest killer for similar reasons. Cenobite has all of the mechanical challenges of curving, blinking, and Clown-bottle-style anti-loop all in one package, plus he has a little bit of Pig/Onryo style macro skill expression at identifying and pressuring a vulnerable survivor.
Yes, you could play Cenobite as just 4.6 m/s man with an m1, and that's why the skill floor of Cenobite is down there with all the other 4.6 killers, but the ceiling of skill expression is astronomically high. He has great (but complex) build synergy with hex totems, hemorrhage, passive regression (e.g. Ruin, Oppression, Jolt), stealth perks, and even chase perks. On the other side, he can nicely counter many items, the endurance status effect, and stealth-based strategies.
The highest level of skill expression for a Cenobite is absolute insane in both the micro and the macro game.
1 -
While this is true, when you know your tiles its imposible for billy to chainsaw you, so even a high skill billy won't get any value against decent players.
0 -
It was really nice when he was playing Elden Ring because we went off for months not hearing about him especially on these forums. The streak needed to end someday though. :/
3 -
it's amazing how forum users are so triggered when someone suggests a streamer's opinion to them. you see a completely different reaction than reddit for example.
on reddit people usually respect the opinions of the well known streamers as they have a lot of experience and game knowledge to back it up, but on the forums??
a lot of disrespect to these streamers saying their opinions are not the only valid ones when the one suggesting it never even claimed it to be, or "you should form your own opinion" as if sharing an opinion with someone else is a crime.
it's very obvious people here have a hate boner for streamers and may i say it's because they never could get the same recognition streamers do even tho they're also experienced players?
1 -
I see many people here complaining about "oh your opinion is just big streamer based so your opinion is wrong". Let me just tell you that just because someone agree with someone else opinion (they might even think the same way before even seeing someone else opinion) doesn't mean that the person is just sheep without their own head.
Yes, you should try to have your own opinion but if it makes sence for you or it is the same as the other "big streamer person", why is it bad? Just auto pilot ignore anytime someone mentions streamer in their opinion is wrong imo.
0 -
A lot of it depends how it's phrased and whether it aligns with people's views on here about certain things. Dead hard was a great example, people would often link Otz's videos showing "this is a problem, even Otz struggles". However, the moment he released a video challenging the narrative the game is survivor sided (or least nowhere near the level the forums claim), boy did people here not take it well. Usual suspects complaining how Otz's skill level was not representative and didn't matter while comically pretending every team was seal team swf and their loses were not down to a lack of innate skill. That being said, mindlessly parroting a streamers opinion without any input or discussion around the topic get's a bit nauseating because at the end of the day, their opinion isn't infallible, sometimes comes from very questionable data and doesn't provide any additional insight or discussion point.
The other component is that this place has been openly mocked by multiple streamers (rightly so) for some of the scorching hot takes people have on game balance. It happened last night in Otz's stream, he and Dowsey were getting rolled by a double range nurse (one of many) and someone in his chat said something along the lines of "Oh no, a killer survivors can't bully" (a sentiment you see on here a lot) and they got rightly crucified by him and chat. The harsh truth is that a lot of people here aren't quite as good as they think, rely on heavy slowdown builds on strong killers and when a streamer challenges that narrative or points out a problem they see it as a personal attack. I get rolled from time to time so don't get me wrong, but it's about how you approach the loss. Too many would rather blame everything else rather than look at what they could have done differently.
However, some streamers have also had some seriously bad takes on the game as well so or brought things to light which would have been better documenting and sending to the developers directly. It also doesn't help that some of their communities are so utterly hellbent on defending said streamer (even if they're wrong) that it can be jarring to other people.
0 -
I think I agree.
Hillbilly and Blight are very difficult to master but not very difficult to pick up and do okay with. If you slap four slowdown perks on either of them, you're gonna do fine against 95% of players.
Nurse is very hard to pick up and do okay with. Even with 4 slowdown perks, a new Nurse is going to lose against 95% of players (the other 5% are my solo q teammates). However, Nurse is not necessarily hard to master.
As I grow more cynical and jaded with this game, I discover I agree less and less with things I may have whole-heartedly endorsed years ago. I fear this is one of them: Nurse isn't a Killer that belongs at her current strength.
1 -
A lot of it depends on how it is phrased
The op litterally went
Haha!! Almighty Scott has the same oppinion as me. So i must be right. Checkmate losers!!
Not really the same as suggesting a oppinion
I agree the reaction here get a bit viceral but it isn't really wrong.
Lot's of experience and gameknowledge does not make these people omniscient. They have been wrong about things before and they will be wrong about things again in the future.
They can make stronger arguments but what they say should never just be concidert as the truth
4 -
He's not the hardest kill in the game at all. He's "hard" if you play him like old Billy mains used to play him, by curving and ACTUALLY using your power at loops. This was even more common because people used charge addons. Now it's incredibly difficult to time well without them.
Just because using a power that probably was never designed to be used like that in mind is ridiculously difficult to use in some loops with curving does not inherently make him the hardest killer. At the end of the day, these days, you're just gonna get pre-pallet dropped like LF has happen to him.
I mean I get it, a skilled curve Billy was fun to play against because there were mindgames you could play, but only a really skilled survivor is gonna play around a curve Billy and not because they have to, but because they think it's fun. But I mean.. do enough curves at an L T wall so you realize that.. maybe it has too much counterplay. But hey, it's fun, and hard because you're making it so.
1 -
You're not searching effectively. In the forums search function you can search for posts from one specific author so you don't need to scroll through post historys.
1 -
This might be true. Never bothered to dig up the past comments of someone else. So no idea.
0 -
That is something that becomes rarer by the day.
These day many will quote streamers or content creators but rarely come with their opinion.
Not saying that streamers and content creators are always wrong, but nowadays they just take their word for it and don't try and form an opinion themselves.
The age of the interwebs is taking the ability to form your own opinion away i guess ๐
0 -
People assuming that everyone just appeals to authority. Your no better then the appeal to authority person. Most streamers agree on obvious stuff? Is that appeal to authority since we agree on the same opinion?
I share a good bit of similar opinions with streamers because surprise its the right opinion to have sometimes. Like with perks and balance updates. Please counteract the points instead of just assuming its wrong because someone quoted a streamer.
1 -
You might wanna reread my comment mate before jumping to conclusions ๐
0 -
Imagine having thought that two different people can have same opinion
1