A little "Would you press the button" question...

The game having four perk slots, two add-on slots, and one offering slot regardless of what they are instead of a weighted point system is horrible for balance.

The game having its only survivor objective holding M1 on a generator forever is really boring and a major drag on the game (including balance).

A plethora of other problems.

Yea I would press the button.

Button go beep

weighted point systems are a drag...

Maybe but it prevents people from just taking all the best perks. Four gen regression perks for example. OId DH could even be a thing under a point system it would obviously be highest value of points. I wouldn't have limited items either you would just unlock different versions permanently. There would be slow medkit with more charges or fast medkit with less for example. It's kind of hard to balance generator times when a survivor can bring nothing or four survivors with green toolbox and BNP.

I would push the button and I've bought every chapter, unlocked every bloody cosmetic (expect for the new ones), got every perk in the game and have almost every achievement but to have the game perfect, in a theoretical mindset; I wouldn't even have to think about it.

Absolutely not. BHVR and DBD exist because of the time and money the players put into the game. Even when they make mistakes and take forever to fix them (if ever). Asking the players to not only forget about that and never ask about it, but both buy everything and build the characters up all over again? Beyond the ######### pale.

Same. There are so many other games available that are better developed and better managed than this one with better community support. This one's already been paid for and time put in. Complete restart = peace out.

I feel like a lot of survivors care about their cosmetics and prestige's. But I just buy blight against then get wraith eventually with iri shards. I'll take the L and run 2 perks for ever, if mmr is accurate and people play the game to win on both sides.

Give me a couple years to get out of full time education and get a stable income so I'm able to afford back the money I spent on this game and then sure I'd press it.

No, I don’t want to ruin almost everybody’s game to fix mostly minor issues.

100% press the button.

Personally I think they should just start the games code from scratch and move onto DBD2 where the game is better coded and a lot of the long standing issues are dealt with but they may not have the resources, ability or desire to do these things. Of course in this reality, everyone keeps all the stuff they already have from dbd1 except for anything that doesn't transfer over.

I agree on the poster above subjective part but I would like to think that addressing the buggy nature of the game as well as the spaghetti code may well be worth it for most.

I think as well my 'desires' would be less on game balance and more on quality of life and stuff that makes the game more enjoyable to all. Things like proper anti cheat, bots, solid single player, possible campaign and story mode as well as other fun things could be there. Make the game more appealing and more for 'everyone' and the direction would be more about player retention and enjoyment while reducing frustration factors as much as possible. I dunno if that stuff counts but if it's just gameplay balance, map balance and all the rest of that, I'd have to think long and hard about it though if I did, I'd try to get as much input as possible on what's perfection rather then trust my own judgement.

Lol, I wouldn't touch the button. But I would watch someone else do it, then laugh sadly as both sides declared a newly balanced DBD as survivor/killer sided. C'mon, if you've been here for more than a couple of months, you know it would happen.

You could hand this community sheer perfection and they'd still find fault or blame their failures on bad design / biased devs.

THIS

Ah yes, the 'fix any issues with the game.' button.

I come to the forum for my daily fiction.